What's Happening?
The White House has instructed NASA to dismantle two critical satellites that monitor climate change, according to recent reports. These satellites, known as the Orbiting Carbon Observatories, provide essential data on carbon dioxide levels and crop health, serving farmers, scientists, and oil and gas companies. Despite their state-of-the-art technology and a recent review recommending their continued operation, the Trump administration has ordered their destruction. The satellites are the only federally used devices specifically designed to track greenhouse gases. One of the satellites is attached to the International Space Station, while the other would burn up in the Earth's atmosphere if the directive is followed. The decision has sparked confusion and concern among scientists, who argue that terminating these missions would be economically senseless and detrimental to U.S. leadership in space.
AD
Why It's Important?
The directive to destroy these satellites could have significant implications for climate research and policy. The data provided by these observatories is crucial for understanding and addressing climate change, and their termination could hinder efforts to manage and respond to environmental challenges. The move has raised concerns among scientists and lawmakers about the potential loss of valuable data and the impact on the U.S.'s ability to forecast severe weather and climate disasters. The decision also reflects broader budgetary priorities under the Trump administration, which has proposed cuts to NASA's budget that could affect numerous missions. This has prompted lawmakers to seek ways to counter these cuts and maintain funding for essential scientific research.
What's Next?
Lawmakers are attempting to counter the proposed budget cuts to NASA, aiming to preserve funding for Earth-observing satellites and other scientific missions. Senator Chris Van Hollen and House representative Zoe Lofgren have expressed opposition to the cuts, highlighting their potential impact on NASA's ability to conduct critical research. The administration's budget proposal for FY26 has been criticized for forcing cuts on already appropriated FY25 funds, which some argue is illegal. The debate over NASA's budget and the future of its missions is likely to continue, with potential implications for U.S. leadership in space and climate research.
