What's Happening?
Experts are calling for menstrual cycle data to be routinely documented by healthcare professionals and researchers, as it can serve as an indicator for various health issues. This data, which includes cycle length, regularity, intensity, and duration of bleeding, is currently not systematically collected in healthcare systems or research, except when assessing reproductive issues. According to a study published in the Lancet Obstetrics, Gynaecology, & Women's Health, the lack of documentation has led to a basic understanding of the menstrual cycle's impact on health and the underdiagnosis of related concerns such as pain and heavy bleeding. The study highlights that menstrual cycle characteristics can indicate conditions like diabetes, thyroid disorders, polycystic ovarian syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, and irritable bowel syndrome. In England, more than a quarter of women are living with serious reproductive health issues, with systemic, operational, structural, and cultural barriers preventing access to care.
AD
Why It's Important?
The inclusion of menstrual cycle data in health records is crucial for improving women's health outcomes. Recognizing the menstrual cycle as a vital health indicator can enhance health services and impact research across disciplines. This recognition could lead to better screening, preventive care, and symptom management, ultimately improving the health of women throughout their lives. The current lack of documentation risks entrenching health inequalities, as women endure years of pain due to reproductive conditions being dismissed. Addressing these issues could lead to more equitable healthcare and better quality of life for women, as serious conditions like fibroids and endometriosis can significantly impact physical and mental health, as well as social and work life.
What's Next?
The call for routine documentation of menstrual cycle data may prompt healthcare systems to reconsider their data collection practices. Public health bodies, such as the NHS, are urged to develop their own period-tracking apps to protect personal data, as private companies currently dominate this space. This shift could lead to more comprehensive health records and better-informed healthcare decisions. Additionally, increased awareness and advocacy may drive policy changes to address systemic barriers in women's healthcare, potentially leading to improved access to necessary treatments and support.
Beyond the Headlines
The push for menstrual cycle data inclusion in health records highlights broader issues of gender bias in healthcare. The term 'medical misogyny' has been used to describe the dismissal of women's reproductive health concerns, underscoring the need for cultural shifts in medical practice. Recognizing menstrual cycles as essential health indicators could challenge existing biases and lead to more gender-sensitive healthcare approaches. Furthermore, the development of public health apps for period tracking could raise ethical questions about data privacy and the role of technology in personal health management.
