Michael Chiklis Defends 'Fantastic Four' Films as Underrated Despite Criticisms

What's Happening?

Michael Chiklis, who portrayed Ben Grimm/The Thing in the 2005 and 2007 'Fantastic Four' films, has expressed his belief that these movies were unfairly criticized by reviewers at the time of their release. In a recent interview, Chiklis stated that critics 'got it wrong' regarding the films, which he feels were 'very underrated' and well-received by audiences. The original films, which also starred Ioan Gruffudd, Jessica Alba, and Chris Evans, were criticized for their execution and storytelling. However, Chiklis argues that the films were family-friendly and fun, and have gained appreciation over time. The discussion around these films has been reignited with the release of Marvel Studios' new 'Fantastic Four: First Steps,' featuring a revamped cast including Pedro Pascal and Vanessa Kirby.

Why It's Important?

Chiklis's comments highlight the ongoing debate between critical reception and audience enjoyment in the film industry. His defense of the 'Fantastic Four' films underscores a broader conversation about how films are evaluated and the potential disconnect between critics and general audiences. This discussion is particularly relevant as Marvel Studios continues to evolve its cinematic universe, with new adaptations and reboots of classic characters. The reception of these films can influence future production decisions and the direction of superhero narratives. Additionally, Chiklis's remarks may resonate with fans who feel nostalgic about earlier superhero films, potentially impacting the legacy and cultural significance of these movies.

What's Next?

With the release of the new 'Fantastic Four' film, there is anticipation regarding how it will be received by both critics and audiences. The performance of the new cast, including Ebon Moss-Bachrach as The Thing, will be closely watched. The success or failure of this reboot could influence Marvel Studios' strategy for future projects and adaptations. Additionally, Chiklis's comments may encourage a re-evaluation of past superhero films, potentially leading to a renewed interest in earlier adaptations and their place in the superhero genre.