Rapid Read    •   8 min read

CABI Scientists Highlight Variability in Agricultural Extension Cost Efficiency and Effectiveness

WHAT'S THE STORY?

What's Happening?

CABI scientists have conducted research revealing significant variability in the cost efficiency and effectiveness of agricultural extension communication channels, such as radio, video, and text messages. The study, published as a CABI Working Paper, focused on low-and-middle income countries to draw lessons for sub-Saharan Africa. It found that factors like the enabling environment, quality of communication channels, and relevance of messaging influence these estimates. The researchers emphasize that while cost efficiency is important, it should not overshadow the delivery of real change, particularly for smallholder farmers using biological control agents in Integrated Pest Management (IPM). The study suggests that the purpose of communication should guide the choice of channels, advocating for a combination of methods to enhance reach and effectiveness.
AD

Why It's Important?

The findings are crucial for agricultural productivity in sub-Saharan Africa, where challenges such as climate change, market demands, and population growth persist. Agricultural extension services play a vital role in equipping smallholder farmers with information to tackle these issues. The study underscores the need for effective communication strategies to promote best agricultural practices, which can improve resilience and stimulate sustainable development. By understanding the cost effectiveness of different channels, stakeholders can better allocate resources to maximize impact, potentially leading to increased adoption of new practices and technologies among farmers.

What's Next?

The researchers recommend that practitioners in sub-Saharan Africa adopt campaign strategies that combine various communication channels to boost the uptake of agricultural technologies. They also call for action research to assess the cost effectiveness and efficiency of these campaigns, alongside evaluating reach, uptake, and behavior change. Further research is suggested to explore gender differences in the reception of agricultural extension information, which could inform more inclusive communication strategies.

Beyond the Headlines

The study highlights the ethical dimension of ensuring that communication strategies do not merely focus on cost but also on the quality and context of information provided to farmers. This approach can lead to more sustainable agricultural practices and empower farmers to make informed decisions, ultimately contributing to food security and economic stability in the region.

AI Generated Content

AD
More Stories You Might Enjoy