Explore

AP News AP News
Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on federal regulation of telecom companies

Supreme Court sides with Trump administration on federal regulation of telecom companies

The Supreme Court has sided with the Trump administration in a case about the power of federal regulators over telecommunications companies
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Supreme Court Backs Trump Administration in Telecom Privacy Regulation Case

Supreme Court Backs Trump Administration in Telecom Privacy Regulation Case

The Supreme Court sided with the Trump administration in a case concerning the enforcement of data privacy laws by federal regulators on telecommunications companies. The 8-1 decision upheld the Federal Communications Commission's (FCC) authority to impose penalties on Verizon and AT&T for failing to protect customer location data. However, the ruling also included a concession that companies are not required to pay penalties immediately, which could alter the regulatory landscape.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Supreme Court Upholds FCC's Authority to Fine Telecom Companies Over Data Privacy

Supreme Court Upholds FCC's Authority to Fine Telecom Companies Over Data Privacy

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in a case involving major telecom companies AT&T and Verizon. The court's 8-1 decision supports the FCC's authority to impose fines on these companies for failing to protect customer data privacy. The case centered on the FCC's in-house proceedings for levying fines, which AT&T and Verizon argued violated their constitutional right to a jury trial. The ruling, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, maintains that the FCC's process does not prevent companies from challenging fines in court. Justice Clarence Thomas dissented, criticizing the decision as unfair to the companies. The FCC had fined AT&T $57 million and Verizon $47 million for allegedly selling customer location data without consent.
Reuters Reuters
US Supreme Court sides with FCC in clash with wireless carriers over fines

US Supreme Court sides with FCC in clash with wireless carriers over fines

By John Kruzel WASHINGTON, June 4 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court backed the Federal Communications Commission's system for levying fines, ruling on Thursday against wireless carriers AT&T and Verizon in their challenge to the agency and handing a win to President Donald Trump's administration.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
U.S. Supreme Court Upholds FCC's Authority to Fine Wireless Carriers Over Data Privacy Violations

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds FCC's Authority to Fine Wireless Carriers Over Data Privacy Violations

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), supporting its authority to impose fines on wireless carriers such as AT&T and Verizon for privacy violations. The decision, made with an 8-1 vote, confirms the FCC's power to levy fines through its in-house proceedings, a system challenged by the carriers on constitutional grounds. The companies argued that the FCC's process deprived them of their right to a jury trial. The FCC had fined AT&T $57 million and Verizon $47 million for selling customer location data without consent. The ruling is a significant endorsement of the FCC's enforcement capabilities, particularly in the context of data privacy and consumer protection.
AP News AP News
The Latest: Scott Bessent testifies before the House on Treasury Department priorities

The Latest: Scott Bessent testifies before the House on Treasury Department priorities

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is back on Capitol Hill to testify before the House Ways and Means Committee on the department’s priorities, one day after he refused to say whether President Donald Trump and his family would still get immunity from IRS audits after the administration abandoned plans for a $1.776 billion compensation fund that would have benefited the president’s allies
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Supreme Court Rules Against Immediate Jury Trials for FCC Fines

Supreme Court Rules Against Immediate Jury Trials for FCC Fines

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that telecommunications companies cannot demand immediate jury trials when fined by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC). The decision clarifies that forfeiture orders issued by the FCC do not constitute a conclusive determination of a case, allowing companies to await further litigation before paying fines.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Cellphone Carriers Enhance Hurricane Response with AI and Drones

Cellphone Carriers Enhance Hurricane Response with AI and Drones

Cellphone carriers like Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile are enhancing their hurricane response strategies using artificial intelligence (AI), drones, and mobile units to maintain communication during storms. Verizon employs drones to assess damage and uses AI to direct repair efforts, while AT&T's disaster response fleet includes boats and helicopters to reach affected areas. T-Mobile prepares months in advance, offering free satellite service during outages. These companies prioritize network access for first responders, ensuring they can perform critical tasks like telemedicine and emergency communication. The carriers' efforts aim to reduce service restoration times and improve network resilience during hurricanes.
Trendline Trendline
AST SpaceMobile Faces Delay in Commercial Service Due to New Glenn Setback

AST SpaceMobile Faces Delay in Commercial Service Due to New Glenn Setback

AST SpaceMobile Faces Delay in Commercial Service Due to New Glenn Setback
AP News AP News
Trump officials went after dozens of colleges. Now they're rewriting the rules for all of academia

Trump officials went after dozens of colleges. Now they're rewriting the rules for all of academia

President Donald Trump's administration put dozens of college campuses under investigation last year and cut federal funding unless they came in line with his Republican agenda
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Survey Reveals Majority Belief in Supreme Court Favoring President Trump

Survey Reveals Majority Belief in Supreme Court Favoring President Trump

A recent survey conducted by Marquette Law School indicates that a significant portion of the American public believes the Supreme Court often rules in favor of President Trump. The poll, conducted in May, found that approximately 60% of adults think the court sides with Trump 'almost always' or 'most of the time.' This perception persists despite the court's rejection of Trump's sweeping tariffs, a key component of his economic agenda. The survey also highlights public opinion on various court decisions, including the rejection of Colorado's ban on conversion therapy and the ongoing debate over transgender athletes in sports. The court's interim decisions have allowed the Trump administration to implement controversial policies, such as terminating federal spending and banning transgender individuals from military service, while litigation is ongoing.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Pentagon Policy on Transgender Troops Ruled Illegal by Appeals Court

Pentagon Policy on Transgender Troops Ruled Illegal by Appeals Court

A federal appeals court panel has ruled that a Pentagon policy banning transgender individuals from military service is illegal. The decision, made by a divided three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, found that the Trump administration's policy was designed to exclude people based on their gender identity. The ruling partially upholds a previous decision by U.S. District Judge Ana Reyes, who concluded that the policy likely violates constitutional rights. The ban, however, remains in effect as the U.S. Supreme Court had previously allowed its enforcement. The appeals court's decision prevents the military from discharging current service members involved in the lawsuit but does not permit new transgender recruits to join. The ruling is on hold to allow the administration to seek further review.