Explore

Trendline Trendline
King Spalding Expands NY Litigation Practice with DOJ Hire

King Spalding Expands NY Litigation Practice with DOJ Hire

King Spalding Expands NY Litigation Practice with DOJ Hire
Trendline Trendline
Morrison Foerster Expands with New Partners Fukuda and Broughan in NY and DC

Morrison Foerster Expands with New Partners Fukuda and Broughan in NY and DC

Morrison Foerster Expands with New Partners Fukuda and Broughan in NY and DC
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Court Upholds $4.3M Judgment Against Former NRA Leader Wayne LaPierre

Court Upholds $4.3M Judgment Against Former NRA Leader Wayne LaPierre

A New York state appellate court has upheld a $4.3 million judgment against Wayne LaPierre, the former executive vice president of the National Rifle Association (NRA). The court found that LaPierre violated his fiduciary duties, resulting in financial harm to the NRA. The judgment includes a 10-year ban on LaPierre holding any fiduciary position within the NRA. This decision follows a 2024 jury verdict that found LaPierre and other NRA leaders misused funds for personal expenses. LaPierre plans to appeal the decision, seeking further review from higher courts.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
New York Court Upholds $4.3 Million Judgment Against Former NRA Leader Wayne LaPierre

New York Court Upholds $4.3 Million Judgment Against Former NRA Leader Wayne LaPierre

A New York state appellate court has upheld a monetary judgment and injunction against Wayne LaPierre, the former executive vice president of the National Rifle Association (NRA). The court's decision follows a 2024 jury verdict that found LaPierre violated his fiduciary duties by misusing NRA funds for personal benefits. The appellate court confirmed the jury's order for LaPierre to repay $4.3 million in damages and prohibited him from holding any fiduciary position within the NRA for ten years. LaPierre's appeal argued that the jury's order exceeded the legal scope by requiring monetary repayment, but the court disagreed, interpreting the statute to include financial accountability. The court also dismissed LaPierre's claim that his resignation during the trial nullified the injunction, emphasizing that voluntary cessation does not moot the case. New York Attorney General Letitia James, who initiated the lawsuit, stated that the decision is a victory for accountability within the NRA.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
States Challenge Federal Authority in Climate Justice Funding

States Challenge Federal Authority in Climate Justice Funding

In the ongoing debate over climate action in the United States, states are increasingly asserting their authority to lead climate justice funding initiatives. The Department of Justice has filed lawsuits against states like New York and Vermont over their 'climate superfund' laws, which require fossil fuel companies to pay for climate damages. These state laws are being challenged on the grounds that they are preempted by federal law. Despite this, states such as California and Colorado continue to pursue litigation against major oil companies, seeking compensation for climate-related damages. This jurisdictional struggle highlights the tension between federal and state powers in addressing climate change.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Department of Justice Challenges State Climate Superfund Laws, Impacting State Authority

Department of Justice Challenges State Climate Superfund Laws, Impacting State Authority

In 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed lawsuits against New York and Vermont over their 'climate superfund' laws, which require fossil fuel companies to pay for climate damages. The DOJ argues these state laws are preempted by federal law and violate constitutional limits on state power. Additionally, the DOJ moved to block Hawaii and Michigan from pursuing their own climate-related cases against fossil fuel companies, reinforcing the claim that such actions fall under federal jurisdiction. Despite these federal challenges, states like California and Colorado continue to pursue litigation against major oil companies for climate-related damages. This legal landscape is part of a broader jurisdictional struggle over who governs climate action in the U.S., with states playing a significant role in implementing federal climate policies through funding mechanisms like the Inflation Reduction Act and the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
New State Surveillance Laws Limit Consumer Legal Recourse

New State Surveillance Laws Limit Consumer Legal Recourse

New surveillance laws in states like New York, Maryland, and Connecticut are making it difficult for consumers to sue over the use of personal data for pricing. These laws primarily leave enforcement to state attorneys general and do not authorize private claims, which consumer advocates argue limits their ability to challenge unfair pricing practices. The legislation aims to prevent retailers from using personal data to inflate prices, but the lack of private enforcement options is seen as a significant hurdle for consumer protection.
Trendline Trendline
New State Surveillance Laws Challenge Consumer Litigation Efforts

New State Surveillance Laws Challenge Consumer Litigation Efforts

New State Surveillance Laws Challenge Consumer Litigation Efforts
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Westchester County Faces Lawsuit Over License Plate Surveillance Program

Westchester County Faces Lawsuit Over License Plate Surveillance Program

A coalition of civil rights groups has filed a class action lawsuit against Westchester County, New York, challenging the use of nearly 600 license plate readers. The lawsuit claims that the program, which has collected 1.6 billion plate scans, constitutes an 'indiscriminate surveillance system' that violates the state constitution. The data collected has been shared with over 50 law enforcement agencies, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The plaintiffs argue that the program lacks proper authorization and infringes on the privacy of millions of motorists by tracking their travel patterns and daily habits. The lawsuit is part of a broader legal effort to address the implications of surveillance technologies.
Trendline Trendline
MMA Sues Patriot Growth for Alleged Poaching of Surety Team

MMA Sues Patriot Growth for Alleged Poaching of Surety Team

MMA Sues Patriot Growth for Alleged Poaching of Surety Team
AP News AP News
Motorists sue Westchester County over 1.6 billion license plate scans

Motorists sue Westchester County over 1.6 billion license plate scans

Civil rights groups have sued on behalf of New York residents to stop Westchester County, New York, from using nearly the nearly 600 license plate readers they have installed around the county
Rapid Read Rapid Read
BusPatrol's Legal Representation Raises Conflict of Interest Concerns in Rockland County Contract Dispute

BusPatrol's Legal Representation Raises Conflict of Interest Concerns in Rockland County Contract Dispute

A legal dispute has emerged in Rockland County, New York, involving the surveillance company BusPatrol and its contract with the county. Aron Law, a Brooklyn-based firm, has filed a lawsuit against Rockland County, seeking the disclosure of contract terms under the New York Freedom of Information Law (FOIL). The firm alleges that BusPatrol's attorneys, Nixon Peabody, who are representing the county, have a conflict of interest. The conflict arises from BusPatrol's interest in keeping contract details secret, while the county has obligations under FOIL to disclose public records. BusPatrol, which shares revenue from citations issued for passing stopped school buses, is not a party in the litigation but is paying for the county's legal fees. The case highlights the tension between public transparency and the protection of trade secrets.