Explore

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Criticizes Supreme Court's Political Perception Risk

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Criticizes Supreme Court's Political Perception Risk

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, a member of the U.S. Supreme Court, has publicly criticized the court's recent decisions, which she believes risk the court being perceived as political. Speaking at a conference hosted by the American Law Institute, Jackson emphasized the importance of the court maintaining an apolitical stance. Her comments follow a series of controversial rulings by the court's conservative majority, including a decision that weakened the Voting Rights Act. Jackson, who was nominated by President Joe Biden in 2022, is one of the court's three liberal justices. She expressed concern over the court's emergency orders that have allowed policies from President Trump's administration to take effect temporarily. Jackson's remarks highlight her belief that the court should adhere strictly to principles and rules to avoid appearing partisan.

Hasbro beats quarterly estimates on strong demand for its digital games

Hasbro beats quarterly estimates on strong demand for its digital games

May 20 (Reuters) - Hasbro on Wednesday reported first-quarter revenue and profit above estimates, aided by strong demand for its digital games such as "Magic: The Gathering", after a cybersecurity incident pushed back its results.

E.l.f. Beauty Reports Strong Q4 Fiscal 2026 Results with Significant Sales Growth

E.l.f. Beauty Reports Strong Q4 Fiscal 2026 Results with Significant Sales Growth

E.l.f. Beauty Reports Strong Q4 Fiscal 2026 Results with Significant Sales Growth

Sucro Limited Reports Decrease in Q1 2026 Profits Amid Market Pressures

Sucro Limited Reports Decrease in Q1 2026 Profits Amid Market Pressures

Sucro Limited Reports Decrease in Q1 2026 Profits Amid Market Pressures

Trump's Judicial Nominees Reference Justice Jackson in 2020 Election Queries

Trump's Judicial Nominees Reference Justice Jackson in 2020 Election Queries

During a Senate confirmation hearing, President Trump's judicial nominees, Ben Flowers and Matthew Schwartz, referenced Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's previous stance on the 2020 election. Both nominees, facing questions from Democrats about their views on the election outcome, cited Jackson's response during her own confirmation process, where she stated it was inappropriate to comment on political matters. This approach is seen as a strategy to counter Democratic concerns that Trump's nominees might be unduly influenced by him. The nominees emphasized that Joe Biden was certified as the winner of the 2020 election and maintained that commenting on political debates was improper. The hearing, led by Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, highlighted the ongoing partisan tensions over judicial appointments and the perceived independence of nominees.

EPA's Deregulatory Efforts Backed by Supreme Court Decisions, Says Official

EPA's Deregulatory Efforts Backed by Supreme Court Decisions, Says Official

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is advancing its deregulatory agenda following several U.S. Supreme Court decisions that have limited the agency's discretion. Deputy Administrator David Fotouhi stated that these decisions empower the EPA to eliminate 'costly and unnecessary regulations' from previous administrations. The agency is focusing on reducing regulations under laws like the Clean Air Act and Clean Water Act. Fotouhi's comments were made during the Federalist Society’s Executive Branch Summit, coinciding with President Trump's announcement of relaxed requirements on refrigerants to reduce consumer costs.

VTech Reports Decrease in Revenue and Profit for FY2026 Amid Tariff Changes

VTech Reports Decrease in Revenue and Profit for FY2026 Amid Tariff Changes

VTech Reports Decrease in Revenue and Profit for FY2026 Amid Tariff Changes

180 Years Ago Today, the AP Was Founded in New York City

180 Years Ago Today, the AP Was Founded in New York City

The Associated Press (AP) stands as a cornerstone in the world of journalism, renowned for its comprehensive news coverage and commitment to accura...

Mississippians Rally Against Supreme Court Decision Affecting Voting Rights

Mississippians Rally Against Supreme Court Decision Affecting Voting Rights

Thousands of Mississippians, joined by allies from other southern states, rallied at the War Memorial Building auditorium to protest a recent Supreme Court decision that weakened the Voting Rights Act. This decision, stemming from the case Louisiana v Callais, has prompted several southern states to redraw congressional districts, potentially diluting Black political power. The rally, organized by a coalition of civil rights groups, took place at a historically significant site for Black disenfranchisement. Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves initially planned a special session to address redistricting but later reversed his decision, although redistricting is expected before the 2027 elections.

Supreme Court Orders Reconsideration of Native American Voting Rights Cases

Supreme Court Orders Reconsideration of Native American Voting Rights Cases

The U.S. Supreme Court has directed lower courts to revisit two significant voting rights cases involving Native American tribes in North Dakota and Mississippi. These cases challenge legislative maps drawn post-2020 census, arguing violations of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals had previously ruled that only the federal government could enforce the law, a decision that conflicted with decades of case law. The Supreme Court's decision to send these cases back for reconsideration follows its recent rulings that have weakened the enforcement mechanisms of the Voting Rights Act. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, advocating for a reversal of the lower court's decisions.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Warns Supreme Court's Political Perception After Voting Rights Decision

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson Warns Supreme Court's Political Perception After Voting Rights Decision

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson expressed concerns about the Supreme Court's perception as a political entity following a significant voting rights decision. Speaking at the American Law Institute in Washington, D.C., Jackson highlighted the importance of maintaining public confidence in the judiciary, which she described as the court system's sole asset. Her comments came after she dissented from a decision that allowed Louisiana to implement new electoral maps, which critics argue undermine the Voting Rights Act by eliminating a majority-Black district. Jackson's dissent emphasized the chaos this decision could cause amid ongoing redistricting battles. Her conservative colleagues on the court, however, dismissed her concerns as unfounded, arguing that the alternative would have been to conduct elections under an unconstitutional map.

Justice Jackson Criticizes Supreme Court's Handling of Louisiana Redistricting Case

Justice Jackson Criticizes Supreme Court's Handling of Louisiana Redistricting Case

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has expressed strong criticism of the Supreme Court's decision to expedite the approval of Louisiana's congressional map redrawing before the midterm elections. This decision followed a significant ruling that weakened the Voting Rights Act, prompting Louisiana to request the court to bypass its usual waiting period. Justice Jackson, the only dissenting voice, argued that the court's actions could be perceived as political, especially during an election year. She emphasized the importance of the court maintaining its apolitical stance and adhering to established procedures. Her critique was part of a broader concern about the court's handling of emergency cases, which she believes undermines the regular judicial process.