Explore

Supreme Court Case: Communist Party vs. Subversive Activities Control Board

Supreme Court Case: Communist Party vs. Subversive Activities Control Board

The Supreme Court case 'Communist Party of the United States v. Subversive Activities Control Board' addresses the requirement for the Communist Party to register as a Communist-action organization under the Subversive Activities Control Act of 1950. The case, argued in 1960 and decided in 1961, involves the constitutionality and interpretation of the Act, which mandates registration for organizations deemed to be under foreign control. The Court examines the extent of control exerted by foreign entities over the Communist Party and the implications of such control on national security. The decision reflects on the balance between individual rights and national security concerns during the Cold War era.

Supreme Court Ruling Challenges Kentucky's License Plate Surveillance Practices

Supreme Court Ruling Challenges Kentucky's License Plate Surveillance Practices

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled in Chatrie v. United States that obtaining location data from private companies constitutes a Fourth Amendment search, requiring a warrant. This decision impacts Kentucky's use of Flock Safety's automatic license plate readers, which have been deployed across multiple law enforcement agencies. The ruling challenges the state's surveillance practices, which involve photographing every passing vehicle and logging data into a searchable database. The Court's decision emphasizes the need for privacy protections and questions the legality of Kentucky's surveillance network.

Morgan L. Ratner's Legal Career and Supreme Court Experience

Morgan L. Ratner's Legal Career and Supreme Court Experience

Morgan L. Ratner, a partner at Sullivan & Cromwell's Litigation Group, has established a notable legal career, particularly in the Supreme Court and Appellate Practice. Ratner has argued nine cases before the U.S. Supreme Court and previously served in the Office of the Solicitor General at the U.S. Department of Justice. Her work there involved arguing cases on federal law topics such as securities regulation and intellectual property. Ratner's legal acumen has been recognized with the John Marshall Award for exceptional service. She is also a Harvard Law School graduate, where she was the top student in her class.

Federal Court Asked to Block Trump's Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship

Federal Court Asked to Block Trump's Executive Order on Birthright Citizenship

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has filed a motion in a New Hampshire federal court to block President Trump's second executive order targeting birthright citizenship. This order, signed in response to a Supreme Court ruling, seeks to deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. to certain categories of parents, including 'alien enemies' and foreign government employees. The ACLU argues that the order defies the Supreme Court's decision, which confirmed that citizenship is determined by place of birth, with limited exceptions. The order is set to take effect on September 6.

Supreme Court to Hear Case on Department of Labor's Authority Over Visa Program Violations

Supreme Court to Hear Case on Department of Labor's Authority Over Visa Program Violations

The Supreme Court is set to hear a case in November concerning the Department of Labor's authority to hold hearings and collect money from employers who violate the terms of the visa program for seasonal farm workers. This case, Department of Labor v. Sun Valley Orchards, LLC, is part of a broader session that includes other significant cases such as religious discrimination and inmate rights. The Department of Labor's role in regulating the H-2A visa program, which allows U.S. employers to bring foreign nationals to fill temporary agricultural jobs, is under scrutiny. The case will address whether the Department has the power to enforce compliance through financial penalties, a move that could impact how labor laws are enforced across the agricultural sector.

ACLU Challenges Trump's Birthright Citizenship Orders in Federal Court

ACLU Challenges Trump's Birthright Citizenship Orders in Federal Court

The ACLU and other groups have filed a court motion to block President Trump's new executive orders aimed at limiting birthright citizenship. These orders follow a Supreme Court decision that rejected Trump's previous attempt to end birthright citizenship for children of non-citizens. The new orders target 'birth tourism' and propose denying citizenship to children of foreign government workers and those involved in fraud. The ACLU argues that these orders violate the 14th Amendment and are an overreach of executive power.

Federal Judge Rules NFA Registration Unconstitutional After Tax Elimination

Federal Judge Rules NFA Registration Unconstitutional After Tax Elimination

U.S. District Judge James Wesley Hendrix has ruled that the National Firearms Act's (NFA) registration requirements for certain firearms are unconstitutional following Congress's decision to eliminate associated taxes. The ruling affects suppressors, short-barreled rifles, shotguns, and any other weapons, as the tax reduction removes the constitutional basis for these registration requirements. The decision marks a significant challenge to the NFA, which has been in place since 1934. The ruling includes a permanent injunction against the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) and the Department of Justice (DOJ), although the injunction is currently stayed pending potential appellate relief.

Supreme Court to Revisit Jury Size Requirement in Kian v. Florida

Supreme Court to Revisit Jury Size Requirement in Kian v. Florida

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to review the case of Kian v. Florida, which questions whether a jury of six is constitutionally sufficient for serious criminal convictions. This case revisits the precedent set by Williams v. Florida, which allowed for six-member juries, diverging from the traditional 12-member jury. The decision could redefine jury requirements across the United States, impacting how states conduct criminal trials. The case highlights ongoing debates about the historical and functional roles of juries in the American legal system.

Supreme Court Case Could Redefine Religious Zoning Laws and Prayer Gatherings

Supreme Court Case Could Redefine Religious Zoning Laws and Prayer Gatherings

Daniel Grand, an Orthodox Jew from University Heights, Ohio, has taken his case to the Supreme Court after being required to obtain a special-use permit for hosting a prayer gathering at his home. The city issued a cease-and-desist notice, arguing the gathering required a permit. Grand's appeal challenges zoning laws that restrict religious gatherings in residential areas. The case highlights broader issues of religious freedom and zoning regulations, with potential implications for how religious entities can challenge such laws. The Supreme Court's decision could impact regulations on religious practices, including those related to health and anti-discrimination policies.

Civil rights groups fight Trump's new birthright citizenship order

Civil rights groups fight Trump's new birthright citizenship order

Legal groups are challenging President Trump's latest executive order attempting to restrict birthright citizenship.

Fifth Circuit Court Decision Threatens First Amendment Rights for Protesters

Fifth Circuit Court Decision Threatens First Amendment Rights for Protesters

A lawsuit stemming from a 2016 protest in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, where a police officer was injured, has led to a controversial decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The case involves DeRay Mckesson, a prominent Black Lives Matter activist, who was sued by the officer despite not being directly involved in the incident. The court ruled that the lawsuit could proceed, suggesting that Mckesson should have anticipated potential violence at the protest. This decision has raised concerns about the implications for First Amendment rights, as it could hold activists liable for actions they did not commit or incite.

ACLU, others urge judge to block Trump's latest birthright citizenship orders

ACLU, others urge judge to block Trump's latest birthright citizenship orders

By Jonathan Stempel Aug 11 (Reuters) - The ACLU and other groups asked a federal judge to block U.S. President Donald Trump from enforcing new executive orders to limit the number of people eligible for birthright citizenship.