Explore

Democratic States Warn Supreme Court of Chaos from Trump Mail Ballot Order

Democratic States Warn Supreme Court of Chaos from Trump Mail Ballot Order

A coalition of 22 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia have cautioned the Supreme Court against lifting an injunction on President Trump's executive order concerning mail voting. The order, which was blocked by a federal court in Massachusetts, aims to establish federal eligibility lists and impose restrictions on mail ballot delivery. The Democratic states argue that lifting the injunction would lead to significant disruptions as states prepare for the upcoming midterm elections. They emphasize that such changes would necessitate the creation of new voter lists and redesign of mail ballots just weeks before ballots are distributed, potentially disenfranchising voters, particularly those with disabilities and in rural areas. The Trump administration, supported by GOP-led states, contends that the injunction should be lifted, arguing that the Democratic states lack standing as no specific policy has been enacted yet.

Connecticut Primary Elections Attract Over $100,000 in Prediction Market Bets

Connecticut Primary Elections Attract Over $100,000 in Prediction Market Bets

In Connecticut, prediction markets such as Kalshi and Polymarket have seen a surge in activity, with over $100,000 in bets placed on the upcoming Democratic and Republican primaries scheduled for August 11. These platforms allow users to wager on various outcomes, including political events, reflecting a growing interest in speculative betting on elections. The rise of prediction markets has been notable over the past two years, offering a new dimension to political engagement and forecasting. Participants in these markets are betting on the outcomes of the primaries, which could influence perceptions of candidate viability and campaign strategies.

San Joaquin County Retains Surveillance Cameras at Ballot Drop Boxes

San Joaquin County Retains Surveillance Cameras at Ballot Drop Boxes

The San Joaquin County Board of Supervisors has voted to continue using surveillance cameras to monitor ballot drop boxes. This decision comes despite recommendations from the county's Election Advisory Committee to end the program due to its cost, approximately $241,000 per election. The cameras provide 24-hour monitoring, with live-streamed footage available to the public. Board members argue that the cameras are essential for maintaining public confidence in the election process.

Galveston County Plans to Change Voting Maps Between Primary and General Elections, Raising Concerns

Galveston County Plans to Change Voting Maps Between Primary and General Elections, Raising Concerns

Galveston County in Texas is planning to implement a new voting map for the upcoming November general elections, despite having already conducted primary elections under a different map. This decision was revealed during a federal court hearing by Joe Nixon, an attorney representing the county. The move has sparked controversy as it could potentially alter the districts of local candidates between the primary and general elections. Pro-voting plaintiffs have filed an emergency petition with the Texas Supreme Court to block the implementation of the new map, arguing that it violates voters' constitutional rights by denying them the opportunity to choose their preferred candidates in the primary. The plaintiffs warn that this could set a dangerous precedent, allowing similar actions across the state, undermining the democratic process.

Lamont and Elliott Exchange Attack Ads in Tightening Democratic Primary

Lamont and Elliott Exchange Attack Ads in Tightening Democratic Primary

Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont and state Rep. Josh Elliott are exchanging attack ads as the Democratic primary approaches. Lamont's campaign released a new ad highlighting Elliott's missed votes, while Elliott's ads have questioned Lamont's ethics and commitment to Democratic values. The primary race has tightened, with Lamont holding a 21-point lead according to recent polls. The ads reflect a more aggressive tone as early voting begins and the primary date nears.

Trump Administration Seeks Supreme Court Approval for Mail Ballot Restrictions

Trump Administration Seeks Supreme Court Approval for Mail Ballot Restrictions

The Trump administration is requesting the U.S. Supreme Court to lift an order blocking its proposed restrictions on mail-in voting for the upcoming midterm elections. The administration argues that lower courts acted prematurely in blocking the executive order, as the rules are still being drafted. The order aims to give the U.S. Postal Service the authority to prevent mail ballots from being delivered to individuals not on a specified list of eligible voters. However, with less than 100 days until the election, logistical challenges make it unlikely that these changes can be implemented in time. The case highlights ongoing legal battles over voting rights and election administration.

Flash Flooding Disrupts Northern Connecticut, Closes Roads and Affects Businesses

Flash Flooding Disrupts Northern Connecticut, Closes Roads and Affects Businesses

Flash flooding in northern Connecticut has caused significant disruptions, closing roads and impacting businesses. In Enfield, roads remained flooded hours after heavy rain, affecting local businesses and residents. The flooding was severe enough to force drivers to turn around, and some residents had to walk to nearby businesses. The flooding also affected other areas, including Suffield and Hartford, where restoration crews were busy addressing flooded basements. The heavy rainfall, reaching one to two inches per hour, triggered the flash flooding, causing widespread inconvenience and damage.

Mississippi lawmakers launch redistricting process after Supreme Court ruling

Mississippi lawmakers launch redistricting process after Supreme Court ruling

Lawmakers in Mississippi have taken the first steps toward potentially redrawing the state's legislative, congressional, and judicial districts

Wisconsin judge rules that paper absentee ballots violate rights of certain disabled people

Wisconsin judge rules that paper absentee ballots violate rights of certain disabled people

A judge has ruled that absentee voting in Wisconsin discriminates against disabled voters, siding with groups that are seeking to force elections officials to allow for electronic ballots

25 states sue over Trump's new tariffs, calling them 'pretext' to replace his old ones

25 states sue over Trump's new tariffs, calling them 'pretext' to replace his old ones

Twenty-five states sued the Trump administration Monday over its latest tariffs, calling them a pretext for replacing import taxes the Supreme Court struck down in February

Op-Ed Highlights Importance of Protecting Voting Rights in U.S. Elections

Op-Ed Highlights Importance of Protecting Voting Rights in U.S. Elections

An op-ed by Miami-Dade County Commissioner Oliver Gilbert III emphasizes the need to protect voting rights and maintain the constitutional balance in U.S. elections. The piece argues against expanding federal control over elections, citing historical examples where increased government authority led to diminished democratic processes. The op-ed warns against proposals like the SAVE Act, which would increase federal involvement in election rules, and stresses the importance of state-administered elections to prevent any single entity from controlling the electoral process.

Kansas Supreme Court Declines Emergency Appeal on Election Law, Preserving Mail Ballot Grace Period

Kansas Supreme Court Declines Emergency Appeal on Election Law, Preserving Mail Ballot Grace Period

The Kansas Supreme Court has declined to expedite an appeal regarding a new state law that eliminates the three-day grace period for counting mail-in ballots. This decision upholds a lower court's injunction that temporarily blocks the enforcement of the law, allowing ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if they arrive within three days. The law, passed by the 2025 Legislature, was challenged on constitutional grounds, with plaintiffs arguing it infringes on voting rights. The court's decision comes just before the statewide primary elections, maintaining the status quo for the upcoming vote.