Explore

Lawmakers Criticize Trump Administration for Immigration Policies Affecting Military Families

Lawmakers Criticize Trump Administration for Immigration Policies Affecting Military Families

A group of U.S. lawmakers, including Senators Elizabeth Warren, Tammy Duckworth, and Richard Blumenthal, along with several representatives, have issued a letter criticizing the Trump administration's immigration policies. The letter addresses concerns over the Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) allegedly coordinating to use military bases as 'traps' for non-citizens, leading to the detention and deportation of military families. The lawmakers argue that these actions undermine military readiness and morale, and may violate legal protections such as the Posse Comitatus Act and the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. The letter calls for a restoration of immigration protections for military families and demands explanations from the involved agencies by August 23, 2026.

The Columbus Dispatch

Bernie Moreno can't be the best Ohio has to offer America, can he? | Letters

Bernie Moreno can't be the best Ohio has to offer America, can he? | Letters

Bernie Moreno and his ex-son-in-law can't be Ohio's best. I can't afford college for all. The Arc de Trump while we struggle. Take Acton seriously.

President Trump Faces Legal Setback Over White House 'Drone Port' Project

President Trump Faces Legal Setback Over White House 'Drone Port' Project

President Donald Trump has faced a legal setback regarding his proposed White House ballroom and 'drone port' project. A federal appeals court ruled that the administration must halt construction until congressional approval is obtained. The project, which includes military features such as drone capabilities, has been a priority for Trump, who argues it is essential for national security. Despite the court's decision, Trump continues to advocate for the project, emphasizing its importance in protecting the White House and future presidents.

DSA Proposes Constitutional Reforms to Shift Power from Presidency to Congress

DSA Proposes Constitutional Reforms to Shift Power from Presidency to Congress

The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) have proposed significant constitutional reforms aimed at increasing the power of Congress at the expense of the presidency and judiciary. This proposal is part of their 2026 'Workers Deserve More' program, which includes a range of policies such as housing for all and a Green New Deal. The DSA's plan involves abolishing the Senate and establishing congressional selection of the executive and judiciary, which would require constitutional amendments. The proposal reflects a broader leftist critique of the concentration of power in the presidency and judiciary, advocating for a legislative primacy approach.

Congress Urges MLB to Address FanDuel Video Involving Bryce Harper

Congress Urges MLB to Address FanDuel Video Involving Bryce Harper

Congress Urges MLB to Address FanDuel Video Involving Bryce Harper

Senator Blumenthal Calls for Congressional Briefing on President Trump's Plane Switch Amid Iran Threat

Senator Blumenthal Calls for Congressional Briefing on President Trump's Plane Switch Amid Iran Threat

Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal has expressed significant concern over a report that President Trump secretly switched aircraft during a trip from Turkey, citing security threats from Iran. The Washington Post reported that Trump was discreetly moved from the larger Air Force One to a smaller Air Force C-32A, using a catering truck for the transfer. This move was reportedly a security measure due to heightened tensions with Iran. Blumenthal described the situation as 'downright scary' and 'unprecedented,' emphasizing the need for a congressional briefing to understand the security threats that prompted such measures. The report has raised questions about the safety protocols for the president and the implications for U.S. security policy.

Senators Reintroduce Ban Asbestos Now Act to Strengthen Public Health Protections

Senators Reintroduce Ban Asbestos Now Act to Strengthen Public Health Protections

Senators Jeff Merkley (D-OR) and John Curtis (R-UT) have reintroduced the Alan Reinstein Ban Asbestos Now Act, aiming to institute a federal ban on the commercial and industrial use of asbestos in the United States. This bipartisan effort seeks to amend the 1976 Toxic Substances Control Act to prohibit the manufacture, processing, use, and distribution of all six recognized asbestos fibers. The act is named after Alan Reinstein, a former president of the Asbestos Disease Awareness Organization, who died of mesothelioma, a cancer caused by asbestos exposure. The bill's reintroduction marks the fifth attempt to pass such legislation, with previous efforts failing to advance through Congress. If successful, the act would require industrial sites to transition away from asbestos use, providing stronger protections for American families and workers against this known carcinogen.

GAO Criticizes FEMA for Workforce Cuts Without Strategic Planning, Impacting Disaster Readiness

GAO Criticizes FEMA for Workforce Cuts Without Strategic Planning, Impacting Disaster Readiness

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has criticized the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for executing workforce reductions without adequate strategic planning. In fiscal year 2025, FEMA saw a 55% increase in employee separations compared to the previous year, with over 4,300 employees leaving the agency. This reduction has reportedly led to a loss of institutional knowledge and experienced staff, exacerbating existing workforce challenges. The GAO report highlights that FEMA rescinded its strategic plan in 2025, leaving the agency without a clear direction for workforce planning. The GAO has recommended that Congress require FEMA to base major workforce decisions on a comprehensive workforce planning process and report to Congress before each hurricane season. Additionally, the GAO has urged FEMA to develop a new strategic plan with clear goals and a formal workforce analysis process.

Senator Angus King Criticizes Republican Move to Hold Dr. Fauci in Contempt

Senator Angus King Criticizes Republican Move to Hold Dr. Fauci in Contempt

Senator Angus King, an independent who caucuses with Democrats, has criticized the decision by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee to hold Dr. Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress. The committee, led by Republican Senator Rand Paul, voted along party lines to hold Fauci in contempt after he invoked the Fifth Amendment during a hearing about the COVID-19 pandemic. King described the hearing as 'volatile and politically motivated,' arguing that it was not a serious exercise in congressional oversight. He defended Fauci's decision to remain silent, suggesting that the hearing was more about political spectacle than genuine inquiry.

Rand Paul's Committee Moves to Hold Fauci in Contempt Over Fifth Amendment Invocation

Rand Paul's Committee Moves to Hold Fauci in Contempt Over Fifth Amendment Invocation

Rand Paul's committee voted to hold Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress after he invoked his Fifth Amendment right during a hearing on July 29, 2026. Fauci, who has been pardoned for past federal offenses, refused to answer questions, citing his constitutional rights. The Justice Department is reviewing the committee's request to charge Fauci, which could result in up to a year in jail. The controversy centers on whether Fauci's pardon negates his Fifth Amendment rights, with Senator Josh Hawley arguing that the pardon removes his privilege against self-incrimination. However, the pardon only covers past offenses, not future testimony, leaving Fauci's invocation of the Fifth Amendment a point of legal contention.

Senate Committee Holds Fauci in Contempt Over COVID-19 Origins Inquiry

Senate Committee Holds Fauci in Contempt Over COVID-19 Origins Inquiry

The Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee has held Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress for invoking his Fifth Amendment rights during a hearing on the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic. The committee, chaired by a member who has previously suggested Fauci should face imprisonment, is investigating the pandemic's origins, which are believed to have started in Wuhan, China. The Chinese government's initial suppression of information and obstruction of international investigations have been focal points of the inquiry. Fauci, a prominent figure in U.S. public health, has been criticized for not providing answers that only the Chinese government can supply.

Senate Committee Holds Fauci in Contempt Over Covid-19 Origins, Focus on China's Role

Senate Committee Holds Fauci in Contempt Over Covid-19 Origins, Focus on China's Role

The U.S. Senate committee has held Anthony Fauci in contempt of Congress following his invocation of the Fifth Amendment during hearings on the origins of the Covid-19 pandemic. The hearings have highlighted the role of China in the early stages of the pandemic, with accusations that the Chinese government suppressed critical information and hindered international investigations. The committee's actions against Fauci have been criticized as a distraction from the more pressing issue of understanding the pandemic's origins, which many argue lies with the Chinese government's lack of transparency.