Explore

The Supreme Court weighs Trump's bid to fire independent agency board members

The Supreme Court weighs Trump's bid to fire independent agency board members

The Trump administration’s push to expand control over independent federal agencies comes before a sympathetic Supreme Court that could overturn a 90-year-old decision limiting when presidents can fire board members

The Supreme Court seems likely to back Trump's power to fire independent agency board members

The Supreme Court seems likely to back Trump's power to fire independent agency board members

The Supreme Court seems likely to expand presidential control over independent federal agencies, signaling support for President Donald Trump’s firing of board members

Fight over Trump's power to fire FTC member heads to US Supreme Court

Fight over Trump's power to fire FTC member heads to US Supreme Court

By John Kruzel and Andrew Chung WASHINGTON, Dec 8 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court is set on Monday to weigh the legality of Donald Trump's firing of a Federal Trade Commission member in a major test of presidential power that could imperil a 90-year-old legal precedent.

Supreme Court to Reconsider Ruling Limiting Presidential Power Over Independent Agencies

Supreme Court to Reconsider Ruling Limiting Presidential Power Over Independent Agencies

The Supreme Court is set to reconsider a 90-year-old decision, Humphrey's Executor, which limits the president's power to remove heads of independent agencies without cause. This case, involving the firing of Rebecca Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission, could overturn the precedent that has historically restricted executive authority. The court's conservative majority, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, has been gradually expanding presidential powers, allowing President Trump to dismiss several agency heads. The case challenges the unitary executive theory, which posits that the president should have complete control over the executive branch, including the power to fire agency leaders at will.

The Latest: Supreme Court likely to back Trump’s power to fire independent agency board members

The Latest: Supreme Court likely to back Trump’s power to fire independent agency board members

The U.S. Supreme Court seems likely to expand presidential control over independent federal agencies, signaling support for President Donald Trump’s firing of board members

The Latest: The Supreme Court weighs Trump’s bid to fire independent agency board members

The Latest: The Supreme Court weighs Trump’s bid to fire independent agency board members

The Trump administration’s push to expand control over independent federal agencies comes before a sympathetic Supreme Court that could overturn a 90-year-old decision limiting when presidents can fire board members

Supreme Court to Decide on President Trump's Control Over Independent Agencies

Supreme Court to Decide on President Trump's Control Over Independent Agencies

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to rule on a significant case involving President Trump's attempt to remove Rebecca Slaughter, a Democrat, from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This case challenges a 90-year precedent that protects members of independent agencies from being removed by the president without cause. Trump argues that the current arrangement is unconstitutional and that the president should have full control over the leadership of government bodies. Lower courts have ruled that Slaughter's termination was illegal, as federal law only allows for removal due to inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance. The case could potentially reshape the federal government by allowing presidents to terminate members of independent agencies at will, thus ending their independence.

Supreme Court Considers Overturning Precedent on Presidential Removal Powers

Supreme Court Considers Overturning Precedent on Presidential Removal Powers

The Supreme Court is reviewing a case that could overturn a 90-year-old precedent limiting presidential power to remove members of independent agencies. The case involves President Trump's firing of Rebecca Kelly Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), challenging the 1935 Humphrey's Executor decision. This precedent has historically protected the independence of agencies like the FTC by requiring cause for the removal of their members. The court's conservative majority appears open to expanding presidential authority, which could reshape the federal government's power dynamics.

Supreme Court Case Could Reshape Presidential Authority Over Independent Agencies

Supreme Court Case Could Reshape Presidential Authority Over Independent Agencies

The Supreme Court is hearing arguments in a case that could redefine the independence of federal agencies and expand presidential power. The case involves President Trump's firing of Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic commissioner on the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). Slaughter was removed from her position not for misconduct but because her service did not align with Trump's priorities. A lower court ruled her firing illegal, citing a 1935 Supreme Court decision that limits presidential power to remove commissioners without cause. The Trump administration argues that this precedent is outdated and should be overturned.

Supreme Court Considers Expanding Presidential Control Over Independent Agencies

Supreme Court Considers Expanding Presidential Control Over Independent Agencies

The U.S. Supreme Court is deliberating a case that could significantly alter the balance of power between the presidency and independent government agencies. The case involves President Trump's dismissal of Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, which was previously deemed unlawful by a lower court based on a 1935 precedent, Humphrey's Executor. This precedent restricts the president's ability to remove members of certain independent agencies without cause. The Trump administration argues that the president should have the authority to dismiss agency officials at will, citing Article 2 of the Constitution. The case has sparked a debate over the extent of executive power, with conservative justices appearing to support the administration's stance.

Supreme Court Considers Expanding Presidential Power Over Independent Agencies

Supreme Court Considers Expanding Presidential Power Over Independent Agencies

The Supreme Court is currently deliberating a case that could significantly expand President Trump's authority to remove officials from independent federal agencies. The case centers on Trump's decision to fire Rebecca Kelly Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), despite a federal law requiring cause for such removals. The court's conservative majority appears inclined to support Trump's position, potentially overturning a 1935 precedent that has protected the independence of agencies like the FTC. This precedent, known as Humphrey's Executor, has historically limited presidential power over independent agencies, which are designed to operate free from direct political influence. The court's decision could have far-reaching implications for the structure and function of the federal government.

Supreme Court Reviews Presidential Control Over Independent Agencies

Supreme Court Reviews Presidential Control Over Independent Agencies

The Supreme Court is reviewing a case concerning President Trump's authority to dismiss a Federal Trade Commissioner, potentially overturning a 90-year precedent that limits presidential power over independent agencies. The case challenges the 1935 Humphrey's Executor decision, which restricts the president's ability to remove agency members without cause. The court's conservative majority appears supportive of expanding presidential control, which could redefine the balance of power between the executive branch and independent agencies. This case could have significant implications for the autonomy and function of federal regulatory bodies.