Explore

Judge halts Trump effort requiring colleges to show they aren’t considering race in admissions

Judge halts Trump effort requiring colleges to show they aren’t considering race in admissions

A federal judge has halted efforts by the Trump administration to collect data that proves higher education institutions aren’t considering race in admissions

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration's Data Demand from California Colleges

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration's Data Demand from California Colleges

A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration's policy requiring universities to submit extensive data on applicants, including race and GPA, to ensure compliance with non-discrimination laws. This decision comes after California and 16 other Democratic-led states filed a lawsuit challenging the policy. The administration's demand was part of a broader effort to investigate whether colleges are illegally considering race in admissions, a practice prohibited by the Supreme Court's 2023 ruling against affirmative action. The University of California and California State University systems argued that the data request was burdensome and risked student privacy. The injunction temporarily halts the data collection for public colleges in the suing states while the case proceeds.

Trump administration can't make colleges provide race-related data, judge rules

Trump administration can't make colleges provide race-related data, judge rules

By Nate Raymond BOSTON, April 3 (Reuters) - The Trump administration cannot force public universities in 17 U.S. states to turn over sweeping amounts of data so it can examine whether they have ceased considering race as an admissions factor, a federal judge ruled on Friday. U.S. District Judge F.

US judge says border officials violated her previous order on warrantless arrests

US judge says border officials violated her previous order on warrantless arrests

By Kanishka Singh WASHINGTON, April 1 (Reuters) - A federal judge in California said on Wednesday that U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials had violated a previous order from her on warrantless arrests when they carried out an immigration sweep in a Home Depot parking lot in Sacramento. U.S.

Supreme Court Justices Question Trump Administration's Historical Sources in Birthright Citizenship Case

Supreme Court Justices Question Trump Administration's Historical Sources in Birthright Citizenship Case

During recent Supreme Court arguments, justices from both sides of the ideological spectrum expressed skepticism about the historical sources cited by the Trump administration in its bid to overturn birthright citizenship. Solicitor General John Sauer argued that the 14th Amendment was intended to apply only to children of legal immigrants domiciled in the U.S., citing obscure historical materials to support this interpretation. Justices questioned the validity of these sources, with Chief Justice John Roberts describing the argument as 'quirky.' Justice Elena Kagan noted the use of esoteric sources, including remarks from President Abraham Lincoln's funeral. The administration's executive order seeks to deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. to parents lacking legal status or those temporarily in the country.

Supreme Court Justices Question Historical Basis of Trump's Birthright Citizenship Case

Supreme Court Justices Question Historical Basis of Trump's Birthright Citizenship Case

During oral arguments at the Supreme Court, justices expressed skepticism about the historical sources cited by the Trump administration to support its challenge to birthright citizenship. Solicitor General John Sauer argued that the 14th Amendment's framers intended citizenship to apply only to children of legal immigrants. However, justices questioned the validity of the obscure sources used to support this claim. Chief Justice John Roberts and others highlighted the potential impact of the executive order on millions of people. The case, Trump v. Barbara, could redefine the interpretation of the 14th Amendment and has drawn significant public and legal attention.

Supreme Court Justices Dismissive of Trump's Birthright Citizenship Arguments

Supreme Court Justices Dismissive of Trump's Birthright Citizenship Arguments

During a Supreme Court hearing, justices appeared dismissive of President Trump's arguments against birthright citizenship. The case challenges the 14th Amendment's provision granting citizenship to all persons born in the U.S. Justices, including Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch, questioned the legal basis of the administration's argument. The case has significant implications for U.S. immigration policy and the interpretation of constitutional rights.

Chief Justice John Roberts Challenges Trump Administration's Birthright Citizenship Stance

Chief Justice John Roberts Challenges Trump Administration's Birthright Citizenship Stance

Chief Justice John Roberts expressed skepticism towards the Trump administration's argument against birthright citizenship during a Supreme Court session. The case revolves around the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to all persons born or naturalized in the U.S. The Trump administration, represented by Solicitor General John Sauer, argued that the amendment does not automatically confer citizenship to children born to non-citizens. Roberts, along with other justices, questioned the administration's stance, emphasizing the historical context of the amendment. The session was notable for President Trump's attendance, marking a rare presidential presence during oral arguments.

Corte Suprema escéptica ante pretensión de Trump de cambiar el derecho a la ciudadanía por nacimiento

Corte Suprema escéptica ante pretensión de Trump de cambiar el derecho a la ciudadanía por nacimiento

La Corte Suprema estadounidense se mostró escéptica este miércoles ante la pretensión del presidente Donald Trump de acabar con el derecho automático a la ciudadanía por nacimiento, uno de los casos más importantes de las últimas décadas para el alto tribunal.

U.S. Supreme Court to Review President Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order

U.S. Supreme Court to Review President Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to review an executive order by President Trump that aims to end birthright citizenship. This legal challenge has drawn significant attention as it questions the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which grants citizenship to all individuals born on U.S. soil. Northwestern University professor and historian Kate Masur discussed the historical context and potential implications of this case. The executive order, if upheld, could alter the longstanding practice of granting citizenship to children born in the United States, regardless of their parents' immigration status. The case has sparked debates about constitutional rights and immigration policies, with potential consequences for millions of individuals currently residing in the U.S.

On birthright citizenship, Trump's restrictive immigration agenda hits a rare roadblock

On birthright citizenship, Trump's restrictive immigration agenda hits a rare roadblock

By Andrew Chung and John Kruzel WASHINGTON, April 2 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump took the short trip from the White House to the U.S.

Supreme Court Considers Birthright Citizenship Case with High Stakes for Trump

Supreme Court Considers Birthright Citizenship Case with High Stakes for Trump

The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing a case on birthright citizenship, a constitutional principle granting citizenship to nearly all born on U.S. soil. President Donald Trump attended the oral arguments, marking a historic appearance. The case challenges the interpretation of the 14th Amendment, which has been in place since 1868. Trump's administration argues that the amendment does not apply to children of temporary or undocumented residents. The case is pivotal for Trump's immigration policy, which aims to curb illegal immigration and has been a central theme of his presidency.