Explore

Luigi Mangione’s notes to self: 'Pluck eyebrows,' 'Keep momentum, FBI slower overnight'

Luigi Mangione’s notes to self: 'Pluck eyebrows,' 'Keep momentum, FBI slower overnight'

A to-do list and travel plans found during Luigi Mangione’s arrest and revealed in court this week shed new light on the steps he may have taken — or planned to take — to avoid capture after UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson’s killing last year

Judge to Decide on Exclusion of Evidence in Luigi Mangione Case Amid Public Release

Judge to Decide on Exclusion of Evidence in Luigi Mangione Case Amid Public Release

In the case involving Luigi Mangione, a judge is set to determine whether certain pieces of evidence should be excluded from the trial. The defense is advocating for the exclusion of some evidence, arguing that its public release could influence the jury selection process. The release of this evidence to the public has raised concerns about its potential impact on the impartiality of potential jurors. The case has garnered attention due to the nature of the evidence and the implications it may have on the trial's outcome. CBS News New York's Alice Gainer reports on the situation, highlighting the complexities involved in balancing public access to information with the need for a fair trial.

Judge to Decide on Exclusion of Evidence in Luigi Mangione Case, Impacting Jury Selection

Judge to Decide on Exclusion of Evidence in Luigi Mangione Case, Impacting Jury Selection

A judge is set to make a decision on whether certain pieces of evidence in the Luigi Mangione case will be excluded from the trial. The defense is advocating for the exclusion of some evidence, which has now been made accessible to the public. This development raises questions about how the release of this evidence might affect the process of seating a jury. The case has garnered attention, and the public availability of evidence could influence potential jurors' perceptions and biases, complicating the jury selection process.

Release of Luigi Mangione Evidence Raises Concerns Over Jury Selection

Release of Luigi Mangione Evidence Raises Concerns Over Jury Selection

In a high-profile legal case, the release of evidence related to Luigi Mangione has sparked debate over its impact on potential jurors. A judge is set to decide whether some of this evidence will be excluded from the trial, as argued by the defense. The public accessibility of this evidence raises questions about its influence on jury impartiality. Legal experts are concerned that exposure to such information could bias potential jurors, complicating the jury selection process. The case highlights the challenges of balancing transparency with the need for a fair trial.

Luigi Mangione's Pretrial Hearing Reveals Bizarre 'Note to Self' Amid Murder Charges

Luigi Mangione's Pretrial Hearing Reveals Bizarre 'Note to Self' Amid Murder Charges

Luigi Mangione, accused of murdering UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, is currently undergoing a pretrial hearing in Manhattan Criminal Court. During the hearing, body camera footage and various items seized during Mangione's arrest were presented. Among these items was a peculiar 'note to self' list, which included reminders such as 'pluck eyebrows' and 'change hat, shoes.' These notes were found alongside a hand-drawn map and survival tactics, suggesting Mangione's plans to evade capture. The arrest took place in Altoona, Pennsylvania, where police discovered a 9mm handgun, a loaded magazine, a silencer, and a notebook allegedly detailing plans to target a health insurance executive. Mangione's defense team is challenging the admissibility of this evidence, arguing that the search of his belongings was conducted without a warrant, thus violating his constitutional rights.

Federal Judge Orders Unsealing of Epstein Grand Jury Materials

Federal Judge Orders Unsealing of Epstein Grand Jury Materials

U.S. District Judge Richard Berman has granted a motion by the Department of Justice to unseal grand jury materials related to the criminal investigations of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. This decision follows the passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandates the public disclosure of these materials. The ruling is the third and final decision in a series of motions aimed at lifting restrictions on evidence from Epstein's criminal case. The judge emphasized the importance of protecting the privacy and safety of alleged victims as the materials are disclosed.

Judge Approves DOJ's Release of Ghislaine Maxwell Grand Jury Materials

Judge Approves DOJ's Release of Ghislaine Maxwell Grand Jury Materials

A federal judge has granted the Justice Department's request to release grand jury materials from the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell, an associate of Jeffrey Epstein. This decision aligns with the Epstein Transparency Act, which mandates the public release of Epstein-related materials. The ruling allows for the modification of protective orders to facilitate the release, while ensuring the privacy of victims is protected. Maxwell, convicted in 2021 for aiding Epstein's abuse of underage girls, is serving a 20-year sentence.

Nadine Menendez Seeks Return of Jewelry Amid Bribery Conviction

Nadine Menendez Seeks Return of Jewelry Amid Bribery Conviction

Nadine Menendez, convicted of aiding her husband, former New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez, in a bribery scheme, is seeking the return of her jewelry from federal authorities. Her legal team argues that the jewelry, which includes gold and pearl necklaces, a Tiffany's ring, and watches, was not used as evidence in the trial and is not considered contraband. The defense claims that the jewelry was seized during FBI searches of her home and consists of family heirlooms and gifts from longtime friends, not bribes. Despite the conviction, the jewelry was not identified as forfeitable in the criminal case. Nadine Menendez is scheduled to begin her 54-month prison sentence this summer after recovering from breast cancer treatment, while her husband began serving an 11-year sentence in June.

Judge Blocks Key Evidence in James Comey Case, Impacting Justice Department Efforts

Judge Blocks Key Evidence in James Comey Case, Impacting Justice Department Efforts

A judge has temporarily blocked key evidence in the case against former FBI director James Comey, posing a potential setback for the Justice Department. The decision affects the department's efforts to reindict Comey, who has been a controversial figure due to his role in high-profile investigations. The blocked evidence is considered crucial for the prosecution's case, and the ruling may delay or complicate the legal proceedings against Comey.

Bullets in Luigi Mangione’s bag convinced police that he was UnitedHealthcare CEO killing suspect

Bullets in Luigi Mangione’s bag convinced police that he was UnitedHealthcare CEO killing suspect

Moments after Luigi Mangione was put in handcuffs at a Pennsylvania McDonald’s, a police officer searching his backpack found a loaded gun magazine wrapped in a pair of underwear

Pentagon Faces Legal Challenge Over Press Freedom Restrictions

Pentagon Faces Legal Challenge Over Press Freedom Restrictions

The New York Times has filed a lawsuit against the Pentagon, challenging a new policy that restricts what journalists can ask within the building. The policy, implemented in October, requires journalists to obtain Pentagon approval before reporting even unclassified information. This has raised concerns among press freedom advocates, who argue that it violates the First Amendment by giving the Pentagon excessive control over press credentials and the scope of reporting. The policy has led to a shift in the composition of the Pentagon press corps, with many traditional media outlets leaving and being replaced by more ideologically-aligned organizations. The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Washington, seeks to overturn these restrictions, which the Times claims hinder basic newsgathering and public accountability.

International court sentences Sudanese militia leader to 20 years in prison for Darfur atrocities

International court sentences Sudanese militia leader to 20 years in prison for Darfur atrocities

Judges at the International Criminal Court have sentenced a leader of the feared Sudanese Janjaweed militia to 20 years imprisonment for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in the catastrophic conflict in Darfur more than 20 years ago