Explore

Rapid Read Rapid Read
Supreme Court to Hear Case on Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook's Dismissal

Supreme Court to Hear Case on Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook's Dismissal

Governor Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve Board, is embroiled in a legal battle against President Trump's attempt to remove her from office. Cook's term is set to last until 2038, but President Trump has sought her dismissal to open up a board seat. The Supreme Court has allowed Cook to remain in her position while the case is being litigated. The high court is expected to hear the case in January, which will be closely watched for its implications on the Federal Reserve's independence and President Trump's influence over monetary policy.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
President Trump Comments on Supreme Court Justices Thomas and Alito Amid Retirement Speculation

President Trump Comments on Supreme Court Justices Thomas and Alito Amid Retirement Speculation

President Donald Trump has expressed his hope that U.S. Supreme Court Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito will remain on the bench, amid ongoing speculation about their potential retirement. In an interview, Trump praised both justices, describing them as 'fantastic.' The discussion arises as Thomas, aged 77, and Alito, aged 75, have not publicly announced any plans to retire. The Supreme Court currently holds a 6-3 conservative majority, with three justices appointed by Trump during his first term. Despite rumors, reports from sources close to Alito and Thomas indicate no immediate plans for retirement. The speculation is fueled by the justices' ages and the historical context of previous justices retiring in their 80s or later.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Justice Sotomayor Challenges Trump Administration's Legal Arguments in Supreme Court Case

Justice Sotomayor Challenges Trump Administration's Legal Arguments in Supreme Court Case

During a Supreme Court hearing in the case of Trump v. Slaughter, Justice Sonia Sotomayor engaged in a critical examination of the Trump administration's legal arguments. The case revolves around the administration's attempt to overturn a longstanding precedent regarding the limits of executive power. Justice Sotomayor questioned Solicitor General Sauer on the administration's rationale for overturning nearly a century-old precedent, highlighting the lack of substantial historical changes that would justify such a move. The case has drawn attention due to its potential implications for the balance of power between the executive branch and independent agencies like the Federal Reserve.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Supreme Court Considers Expanding Presidential Power to Dismiss FTC Commissioners

Supreme Court Considers Expanding Presidential Power to Dismiss FTC Commissioners

The Supreme Court is currently deliberating a case that could significantly expand presidential powers, specifically regarding the ability of President Trump to dismiss a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) commissioner without cause. This case represents a pivotal moment in the interpretation of executive authority, as the court's conservative majority appears inclined to support increased presidential control over independent agencies. The arguments presented on Monday focused on whether the president should have the authority to remove certain agency members at will, a move that could reshape the balance of power between the executive branch and independent regulatory bodies.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Supreme Court Deliberates on Campaign Finance Limits Amid GOP Challenge

Supreme Court Deliberates on Campaign Finance Limits Amid GOP Challenge

The U.S. Supreme Court is currently hearing a case that challenges the limits on campaign spending by political parties in coordination with candidates. This case, brought by Republican senatorial and congressional campaign committees along with former Ohio politicians JD Vance and Steve Chabot, questions the constitutionality of these limits under the First Amendment. The Federal Election Commission (FEC), responsible for enforcing these rules, is the defendant in this case. The Supreme Court has previously weakened campaign finance restrictions, notably with the Citizens United decision in 2010, which allowed unlimited independent political spending by corporations and unions. The current case could further alter the landscape of campaign finance by potentially allowing political parties to spend more freely in support of candidates, thereby increasing the influence of large donors.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Supreme Court to Decide on President Trump's Control Over Independent Agencies

Supreme Court to Decide on President Trump's Control Over Independent Agencies

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to rule on a significant case involving President Trump's attempt to remove Rebecca Slaughter, a Democrat, from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This case challenges a 90-year precedent that protects members of independent agencies from being removed by the president without cause. Trump argues that the current arrangement is unconstitutional and that the president should have full control over the leadership of government bodies. Lower courts have ruled that Slaughter's termination was illegal, as federal law only allows for removal due to inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance. The case could potentially reshape the federal government by allowing presidents to terminate members of independent agencies at will, thus ending their independence.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Supreme Court Considers President Trump's Bid to Control Independent Agencies

Supreme Court Considers President Trump's Bid to Control Independent Agencies

The Supreme Court is currently deliberating a significant case that could potentially overturn a 90-year precedent regarding the control of independent agencies. President Trump is seeking to assert more control over these agencies, which traditionally operate with a degree of independence from the executive branch. The case has drawn considerable attention as it challenges the established norms of agency autonomy, which have been in place to prevent undue political influence. Legal experts, including ABC News’ Devin Dwyer and contributor James Sample, are closely analyzing the implications of this case, which could redefine the balance of power between the presidency and independent regulatory bodies.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Supreme Court Considers Expanding Presidential Authority Over Regulatory Agencies

Supreme Court Considers Expanding Presidential Authority Over Regulatory Agencies

The Supreme Court is reviewing a case that could redefine the president's authority over independent regulatory agencies. The case involves the firing of a Federal Trade Commission (FTC) commissioner by President Trump, challenging the long-standing precedent that protects agency leaders from being removed without cause. The court's conservative majority has shown interest in overturning this precedent, which could allow the president to dismiss agency heads at will. This case is part of a broader discussion on the separation of powers and the extent of executive control over independent bodies that have traditionally operated with a degree of autonomy from the White House.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Supreme Court to Review Presidential Power in Firing of FTC Head

Supreme Court to Review Presidential Power in Firing of FTC Head

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear arguments regarding President Donald Trump's authority to dismiss the head of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), Rebecca Kelly Slaughter. This case arises from Trump's decision to remove Slaughter in March, despite a federal law that restricts the removal of FTC members to cases of inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance. The court's decision will have significant implications for the separation of powers and the independence of federal agencies. This case is part of a broader examination of presidential powers and could influence future cases involving the autonomy of independent agencies.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Supreme Court Reviews Trump's Authority to Dismiss Federal Agency Officials

Supreme Court Reviews Trump's Authority to Dismiss Federal Agency Officials

The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing a pivotal case, Trump v. Slaughter, which questions President Trump's authority to dismiss members of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) without cause. This case arose after Trump fired Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, a Democratic appointee, citing her actions as inconsistent with his administration's priorities. The case challenges a longstanding legal precedent that protects the independence of federal agencies from direct presidential control. A lower court previously ruled Slaughter's removal illegal, prompting the Trump administration to appeal. The Supreme Court's decision could redefine the boundaries of presidential power over independent agencies.
AP News AP News
Honduras seeks arrest of ex-President Hernández after Trump pardon

Honduras seeks arrest of ex-President Hernández after Trump pardon

Honduras Attorney General Johel Zelaya has ordered authorities and asked Interpol to execute a 2023 arrest order for ex-President Juan Orlando Hernández
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Supreme Court Considers Case Impacting President Trump's Authority Over FTC

Supreme Court Considers Case Impacting President Trump's Authority Over FTC

The Supreme Court is currently deliberating a case that could significantly enhance President Trump's authority over the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The case centers on whether President Trump can dismiss Rebecca Slaughter, an FTC commissioner, not for cause but because she allegedly does not align with his administration's agenda. This legal question challenges the traditional independence of federal agencies, which are typically insulated from direct presidential control to ensure unbiased regulatory oversight. The case has drawn attention from legal experts, including law professor and former assistant U.S. attorney Kim Wehle, who have weighed in on the potential implications for the balance of power between the executive branch and independent regulatory bodies.