Explore

EEOC Prioritizes Religious Accommodations in National Enforcement Plan

EEOC Prioritizes Religious Accommodations in National Enforcement Plan

The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has designated religious freedom, specifically religious accommodations, as a primary focus area within its National Enforcement Plan. Employers are generally required to provide reasonable accommodations for known religious beliefs, practices, or observances that conflict with job requirements, provided these accommodations do not impose an undue hardship on the business. This principle, while seemingly straightforward, presents complexities in its application. The EEOC's emphasis follows the Supreme Court's decision in *Groff*, which established a higher standard for employers seeking to claim undue hardship in religious accommodation cases. This development signals increased scrutiny from the EEOC on how employers handle such requests and aims to ensure compliance with federal anti-discrimination laws.

California Bill AB 1883 Proposes Ban on AI-Powered Workplace Surveillance Tools

California Bill AB 1883 Proposes Ban on AI-Powered Workplace Surveillance Tools

California's Assembly Bill 1883 (AB 1883) seeks to prohibit employers from using certain artificial intelligence-powered workplace surveillance tools. The bill specifically targets tools that collect neural data or recognize an individual's emotional state. This prohibition would apply to a wide range of employers, including governmental entities such as charter cities and the University of California. The bill outlines exceptions for specific operations where the use of such tools is deemed reasonably necessary to comply with federal statutes, regulations, or binding federal contracts related to aircraft development for national airspace or products/services for national security, military, space, or defense purposes. The Labor Commissioner or a public prosecutor would be authorized to enforce the bill's provisions, with violations subject to a civil penalty of up to $500 per instance.

Documentary 'The Case Against 8' Examines Legal Battle to Overturn California's Proposition 8

Documentary 'The Case Against 8' Examines Legal Battle to Overturn California's Proposition 8

The film 'The Case Against 8' is a documentary that delves into the legal efforts to overturn California's Proposition 8. This proposition, passed in 2008, banned same-sex marriage in the state. The documentary chronicles the journey of the plaintiffs and their legal team as they navigate the complex judicial system, ultimately leading to the Supreme Court's decision. The film received critical acclaim, earning the Directing Award for U.S. Documentaries at the 2014 Sundance Film Festival, highlighting its significant contribution to understanding a pivotal moment in the fight for LGBTQ+ rights in the United States.

Detroit Free Press

Detroit judge drops contempt threat for lawyers who went on strike

Detroit judge drops contempt threat for lawyers who went on strike

A Detroit judge dropped her contempt threat as UAW's Shawn Fain took another shot.

SPLC and Legal Defense Fund Appeal Denial of Injunction in University of Alabama Magazine Case

SPLC and Legal Defense Fund Appeal Denial of Injunction in University of Alabama Magazine Case

Attorneys representing students who sued the University of Alabama are appealing a district court's denial of a preliminary injunction. The lawsuit concerns the consolidation of the university's Black student magazine, 'Nineteen Fifty-Six,' and its women's magazine, 'Alice.' The appeal has been filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, seeking to overturn U.S. District Judge Edmund LaCour, Jr.'s May order. Judge LaCour's decision argued that the university's actions were either a core curricular decision, within its right to manage forums it created, or a reasonable and viewpoint-neutral content selection. Sam Boyd, a senior supervising attorney at the Southern Poverty Law Center, stated that the suspension of these magazines constitutes unjust censorship of students and perpetuates discrimination. The magazines were initially shuttered by the university, which cited guidance from the Department of Justice's DEI memo, and later relaunched as independently funded projects.

Federal Judge Rules Farmworker Wage Cut Unlawful, Mendocino Vineyards Continue Under Lower Rates

Federal Judge Rules Farmworker Wage Cut Unlawful, Mendocino Vineyards Continue Under Lower Rates

A federal judge has ruled that the U.S. Department of Labor acted unlawfully when it revised minimum wages for farmworkers on H-2A visas, a program allowing American growers to hire foreign workers for seasonal jobs. U.S. District Judge Kirk E. Sherriff found four aspects of the new rule to be arbitrary and implemented without the required public comment. The rule, which took effect for the current season, set lower wage rates for H-2A workers, in some cases allowing them to be paid less than U.S. workers doing the same job. For instance, in Mendocino County, vineyard jobs are currently paying $16.90 an hour, a decrease from last season's federal floor of $19.97. Despite the ruling, the judge did not immediately overturn the rule, allowing growers to continue paying the lower rates for now. However, the Labor Department has been given seven days to notify state agencies and employers that wage adjustment payments may be required later, potentially leading to backpay for both H-2A and U.S. farmworkers.

EEOC Proposes Significant Changes to Federal Employee Discrimination Complaint Process

EEOC Proposes Significant Changes to Federal Employee Discrimination Complaint Process

On August 26, 2026, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) approved a proposed rule aimed at altering how federal employees pursue administrative cases alleging workplace discrimination. The Republican-controlled EEOC voted 2-1 to advance these changes. Key aspects of the proposed rule include limiting hearings before administrative judges to a specific set of cases, eliminating the current requirement for cases to undergo mediation, and removing the ability for federal workers to file class action-style complaints. Additionally, the EEOC has suggested modifications to the overall complaint process for federal employees, with the stated goal of making it more efficient, equitable, and straightforward by discontinuing mandatory pre-complaint EEO counseling. These proposed changes represent a significant shift in the administrative procedures available to federal employees seeking redress for alleged discrimination.

Southwest Airlines Permanently Barred from Using Future Social Media Posts to Terminate Anti-Abortion Flight Attendant

Southwest Airlines Permanently Barred from Using Future Social Media Posts to Terminate Anti-Abortion Flight Attendant

A North Texas district judge has issued a permanent injunction preventing Southwest Airlines from using any future social media posts by anti-abortion flight attendant Charlene Carter as grounds for disciplinary action or termination. This ruling is the latest development in a nine-year legal battle between Carter, Southwest Airlines, and the Transport Workers Union, Local 556 (TWU556). Carter was fired in 2017 for sending graphic anti-abortion images to colleagues via Facebook, which Southwest deemed a violation of its social media policy and workplace bullying. A jury initially sided with Carter in 2022, awarding her over $5 million, later reduced to approximately $1 million. The court also ordered Southwest to rehire Carter with full seniority and instructed the airline to issue a corrected statement to all flight attendants clarifying that it cannot discriminate based on religious practices and beliefs, including those expressed on social media concerning abortion.

States Increase Efforts to Hold Federal Officers Accountable for Misconduct

States Increase Efforts to Hold Federal Officers Accountable for Misconduct

Several U.S. states are enacting and testing civil causes of action to hold federal officers accountable for misconduct, a trend described by some as 'reverse 1983' efforts. States like Illinois, Connecticut, Vermont, Oregon, and Maryland have passed such statutes, with Maryland's law taking effect in October. California's 'No Kings Act,' SB 747, has also passed the State Senate. This movement is rooted in the historical understanding that state-law damages suits against federal officers were a common mechanism for accountability until the 1971 Bivens decision. The Justice Department has challenged Illinois's Bivens Act, arguing it violates the Supremacy Clause by directly regulating and discriminating against federal officers, particularly in immigration enforcement. However, proponents argue that well-designed state laws can enforce constitutional rights uniformly across all government actors without singling out federal functions.

U.S. Judge Reduces $9.2 Million Patent Infringement Award Against GlobalFoundries to $1 Million

U.S. Judge Reduces $9.2 Million Patent Infringement Award Against GlobalFoundries to $1 Million

U.S. Judge Reduces $9.2 Million Patent Infringement Award Against GlobalFoundries to $1 Million

Woman awarded $20K after burns from Church's Texas Chicken pot pie

Woman awarded $20K after burns from Church's Texas Chicken pot pie

A judge ruled Church’s Texas Chicken must pay $20K to Alabama woman who sued over second-degree burns she received from the chain's food.

WilmerHale Attorney Examines AI's Impact on Consumer Rights and Regulatory Frameworks

WilmerHale Attorney Examines AI's Impact on Consumer Rights and Regulatory Frameworks

WilmerHale Attorney Examines AI's Impact on Consumer Rights and Regulatory Frameworks