Explore

Rapid Read Rapid Read
Ninth Circuit Judge Nelson Charged with Misdemeanor Battery in Idaho

Ninth Circuit Judge Nelson Charged with Misdemeanor Battery in Idaho

Judge Ryan D. Nelson of the Ninth Circuit has been charged with misdemeanor battery and malicious injury to property, according to court records. The charges were filed by the city prosecutor's office in Idaho Falls, stemming from an altercation on April 2 with a man in a parking lot. Video footage of the incident reportedly shows Nelson acting aggressively. Nelson, who was nominated by President Trump in 2018, pleaded not guilty to both charges on May 13. A pretrial conference is scheduled for June 18 in Idaho's 7th Judicial District in Bonneville County.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Judge Ryan Nelson Faces Criminal Charges Following Parking Lot Confrontation

Judge Ryan Nelson Faces Criminal Charges Following Parking Lot Confrontation

U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Ryan Nelson, a Trump appointee, is facing misdemeanor charges of battery and malicious injury to property following a confrontation in a parking lot on April 2. The incident, which was captured on video, involved Nelson allegedly throwing another man's sunglasses and attempting to grab his phone. Nelson has pleaded not guilty to the charges. The confrontation reportedly began over a parking dispute involving two oversized trucks. Nelson's lawyer, Curtis R. Smith, stated that Nelson maintains a presumption of innocence and will address the charges through the judicial system. Despite these personal legal issues, Nelson has continued his professional duties, participating in court arguments and issuing opinions.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Ninth Circuit Judge Nelson Charged with Misdemeanor Battery in Idaho Falls

Ninth Circuit Judge Nelson Charged with Misdemeanor Battery in Idaho Falls

Judge Ryan D. Nelson of the Ninth Circuit has been charged with misdemeanor battery and malicious injury to property following an altercation in Idaho Falls. The incident, which occurred on April 2, involved Nelson and another individual in a parking lot. Video footage reportedly shows Nelson acting aggressively. He pleaded not guilty to the charges on May 13, and a pretrial conference is scheduled for June 18. Nelson, who was nominated by President Trump in 2018, has been serving on the bench since his confirmation.
Reuters Reuters
US Supreme Court poised to rule on gun laws and transgender athletes

US Supreme Court poised to rule on gun laws and transgender athletes

By Jan Wolfe WASHINGTON, June 7 (Reuters) - Disputes involving President Donald Trump's policies on tariffs, immigration and firing regulatory officials have drawn a lot of attention during the Supreme Court's current term, but the justices also are poised to decide major cases concerning U.S. "
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Federal Judge Overturns Trump Administration Immigration Policy Impacting 39 Countries

Federal Judge Overturns Trump Administration Immigration Policy Impacting 39 Countries

A federal judge has invalidated a Trump administration immigration policy that affected immigrants from 39 countries. The policy, which was implemented following a shooting involving National Guard members, made it more difficult for immigrants from these countries to obtain asylum, work permits, green cards, and citizenship in the U.S. U.S. District Chief Judge John McConnell Jr. criticized the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) for overstepping its authority and acting without proper justification. The judge described the policy as arbitrary and capricious, accusing it of being influenced by anti-immigrant sentiments under the guise of national security. The ruling impacts all pending cases at USCIS involving individuals from the affected countries, ensuring that legal immigration pathways remain open.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration's USDA Funding Conditions Amid Legal Challenge

Federal Judge Blocks Trump Administration's USDA Funding Conditions Amid Legal Challenge

A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against the Trump administration's attempt to enforce new conditions on federal nutrition funding. The ruling, made by U.S. District Judge Myong Joun, temporarily halts the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) efforts to tie funding to compliance with various federal policy priorities. This decision comes in response to a lawsuit filed by a coalition of 20 states and the District of Columbia, which argued that the new conditions could jeopardize funding for critical food assistance programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The states contend that the USDA exceeded its authority by imposing requirements unrelated to nutrition and agriculture, such as those concerning immigration and gender policies.
AP News AP News
Judge tosses Kennedy Center suit against musician who canceled Christmas Eve show

Judge tosses Kennedy Center suit against musician who canceled Christmas Eve show

Attorneys for musician Chuck Redd said on Friday that a D.C. Superior Court judge had dismissed a breach of contract lawsuit filed against Redd after he canceled a Christmas Eve performance at the Kennedy Center in protest of President Donald Trump’s influence over the venue
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Judge Dismisses Kennedy Center Lawsuit Against Musician Chuck Redd Over Performance Cancellation

Judge Dismisses Kennedy Center Lawsuit Against Musician Chuck Redd Over Performance Cancellation

A D.C. Superior Court judge has dismissed a breach of contract lawsuit filed by the Kennedy Center against musician Chuck Redd. The lawsuit was initiated after Redd canceled a Christmas Eve performance at the venue, protesting President Trump's influence over the Kennedy Center. The dismissal was granted under Washington's Anti-SLAPP laws, which aim to prevent lawsuits that suppress free speech on public interest matters. Redd, known for his work with jazz legends like Dizzy Gillespie, had been a regular performer at the Kennedy Center's holiday 'Jazz Jams' since 2006. He canceled his performance following the decision by the Trump-appointed board to add the president's name to the venue. Redd's legal team argued that he was not contractually obligated to perform, as he had not signed the provided contract. The court's decision was seen as a victory for Redd, who expressed satisfaction with the ruling.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Trump-Appointed Judge Refers DOJ Attorneys to Disciplinary Committee Over Misleading Conduct

Trump-Appointed Judge Refers DOJ Attorneys to Disciplinary Committee Over Misleading Conduct

U.S. District Judge Mary S. McElroy, appointed by President Trump, has referred attorneys from the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to a court disciplinary committee. This action follows the handling of subpoenas related to trans medical care at Rhode Island Hospital. Judge McElroy criticized the DOJ for misrepresenting and withholding information from both her court and the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. She noted that the DOJ's actions have placed involved parties in a difficult procedural position. The judge highlighted that a senior DOJ attorney remained silent while a junior attorney, with limited experience, was left to address the court's questions. Consequently, Judge McElroy granted motions to quash the subpoenas and enjoined the DOJ from seeking related documents.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Supreme Court Decisions and Legal Challenges Highlighted in Weekly Roundup

Supreme Court Decisions and Legal Challenges Highlighted in Weekly Roundup

The latest weekly roundup from Howard Bashman's 'How Appealing' blog covers significant developments in appellate litigation. Key stories include a Supreme Court decision affirming the FCC's authority to fine cellphone carriers like AT&T and Verizon for failing to protect consumer information, and a Texas high school student's legal battle against a school district's hair length policy, which he claims violates the Texas CROWN Act. Additionally, a House Republican is preparing an impeachment bid against an Atlanta judge, and Justice Barrett's vote in a lesser-known case could have far-reaching implications for lawsuits challenging the Trump administration.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Trump Administration's Legal Pursuit of John Bolton Criticized as Vindictive

Trump Administration's Legal Pursuit of John Bolton Criticized as Vindictive

The Wall Street Journal's editorial board has criticized President Trump's administration for its legal actions against former National Security Adviser John Bolton. Bolton, who served under Trump, is facing charges related to the mishandling of classified documents while preparing his memoir, 'The Room Where It Happened.' The editorial describes the administration's efforts as 'especially troubling and truly vindictive.' Bolton has reportedly reached a tentative plea deal, agreeing to plead guilty to a single felony count of illegal retention of sensitive national security documents and to pay a fine exceeding $2 million. This plea deal is pending approval by a judge, with a re-arraignment hearing scheduled for June 26. The Journal argues that the legal battle has placed Bolton in a difficult position, potentially costing him up to $3 million in legal fees if he chose to defend himself at trial.
Rapid Read Rapid Read
Federal Judge to Decide on Trump Administration's Student Loan Forgiveness Rule Impacting Borrowers

Federal Judge to Decide on Trump Administration's Student Loan Forgiveness Rule Impacting Borrowers

A federal judge is currently deliberating whether to block a rule introduced by the Trump administration that could significantly impact student loan borrowers' eligibility for federal debt forgiveness programs, such as the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF). The rule, set to take effect in July, aims to narrow the criteria for which employers qualify under these programs. Critics argue that this change could leave borrowers uncertain about the status of their loan forgiveness after years of payments, potentially discouraging employment in nonprofit or public-service sectors. The Education Department defends the rule, stating it targets organizations involved in illegal activities. The decision by the judge will determine if the rule will be implemented or temporarily halted.