Explore

Supreme Court Considers Major Challenge to Campaign Spending Limits

Supreme Court Considers Major Challenge to Campaign Spending Limits

The Supreme Court is currently deliberating a significant case that challenges the existing legal limits on coordinated campaign spending. This case questions whether these long-standing restrictions infringe upon the First Amendment rights. The discussion is centered around the balance between regulating campaign finances to prevent corruption and protecting free speech rights. ABC News contributor Sarah Isgur has highlighted the potential implications of this case, which could reshape the landscape of political campaign financing in the United States.

Supreme Court Considers Expanding Presidential Powers in FTC Commissioner Case

Supreme Court Considers Expanding Presidential Powers in FTC Commissioner Case

The U.S. Supreme Court is deliberating a case that could potentially expand presidential powers, specifically regarding the ability to fire an FTC commissioner. The case involves the Trump administration's challenge to the restrictions on the president's power to remove members of independent agencies like the FTC. During the hearing, the justices focused on the implications of either upholding or striking down these removal restrictions. The court's decision could redefine the balance of power between Congress and the presidency, particularly concerning the control over independent agencies. The justices expressed concerns about the potential consequences of their ruling, including the risk of Congress insulating large parts of the executive branch from presidential control.

Supreme Court to Hear Case on Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook's Dismissal

Supreme Court to Hear Case on Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook's Dismissal

Governor Lisa Cook, a member of the Federal Reserve Board, is embroiled in a legal battle against President Trump's attempt to remove her from office. Cook's term is set to last until 2038, but President Trump has sought her dismissal to open up a board seat. The Supreme Court has allowed Cook to remain in her position while the case is being litigated. The high court is expected to hear the case in January, which will be closely watched for its implications on the Federal Reserve's independence and President Trump's influence over monetary policy.

US Supreme Court weighs challenge to campaign spending curbs in JD Vance case

US Supreme Court weighs challenge to campaign spending curbs in JD Vance case

By John Kruzel WASHINGTON, Dec 9 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court is set on Tuesday to hear arguments in a Republican-led challenge on free speech grounds to federal limits on spending by political parties in coordination with electoral candidates in a case involving Vice President JD Vance.

Supreme Court weighs Republican appeal to end limits on party spending in federal elections

Supreme Court weighs Republican appeal to end limits on party spending in federal elections

The Supreme Court is considering a Republican-led drive, backed by President Donald Trump’s administration, to overturn a quarter-century-old decision and erase limits on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates for Congress and president

Supreme Court to Hear Cases on Presidential Power and Campaign Finance

Supreme Court to Hear Cases on Presidential Power and Campaign Finance

The Supreme Court is set to hear two significant cases that could have far-reaching implications for presidential power and campaign finance. The first case, Trump v. Slaughter, will address whether President Trump's firing of FTC Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter violates the Constitution's separation of powers. This case could potentially overturn the 1935 precedent set by Humphrey's Executor v. United States, which limits the president's power to remove certain executive officials. The second case, NRSC v. FEC, involves campaign finance laws and challenges the limits on coordinated party expenditures, arguing that these limits violate the First Amendment. This case, brought by Republican interests, seeks to ease restrictions on big money donors' influence over elections.

The Latest: Trump approves sale of more advanced Nvidia computer chips used in AI to China

The Latest: Trump approves sale of more advanced Nvidia computer chips used in AI to China

President Donald Trump says he'll allow Nvidia to sell an advanced type of computer chip used in the development of artificial intelligence to “approved customers” in China

Vice President JD Vance's Ambiguity on 2028 Presidential Run Affects Supreme Court Campaign Finance Case

Vice President JD Vance's Ambiguity on 2028 Presidential Run Affects Supreme Court Campaign Finance Case

Vice President JD Vance's indecision regarding a potential 2028 presidential run is impacting a Supreme Court case concerning campaign finance restrictions. The case challenges limits on how much party committees can spend in coordination with candidates. Vance, who initially contested these limits as a Senate candidate, has not confirmed any future candidacy, leading to arguments that the case is moot. Roman Martinez, appointed by the court to defend the restrictions, argues that Vance's lack of a concrete plan to run for office nullifies his stake in the case. The Supreme Court's conservative majority, historically skeptical of campaign finance restrictions, is hearing the case, which could have significant implications for party spending in elections.

Supreme Court to Decide on President Trump's Control Over Independent Agencies

Supreme Court to Decide on President Trump's Control Over Independent Agencies

The U.S. Supreme Court is set to rule on a significant case involving President Trump's attempt to remove Rebecca Slaughter, a Democrat, from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). This case challenges a 90-year precedent that protects members of independent agencies from being removed by the president without cause. Trump argues that the current arrangement is unconstitutional and that the president should have full control over the leadership of government bodies. Lower courts have ruled that Slaughter's termination was illegal, as federal law only allows for removal due to inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance. The case could potentially reshape the federal government by allowing presidents to terminate members of independent agencies at will, thus ending their independence.

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide on Birthright Citizenship Amid Trump Challenge

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide on Birthright Citizenship Amid Trump Challenge

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case challenging President Trump's executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship. This order, signed at the start of Trump's second term, directs federal agencies to deny U.S. citizenship to children born in the U.S. if neither parent is a U.S. citizen or lawful permanent resident. Historically, a Supreme Court ruling over a century ago affirmed that children born in the U.S. to foreign parents are citizens under the 14th Amendment. However, the Trump administration argues that the 14th Amendment has not been universally interpreted to grant citizenship to all born in the country. Lower federal courts have blocked Trump's attempts, leading to the Supreme Court's involvement to decide on the executive order's merits, with a decision expected in 2026.

Supreme Court Reviews Trump's Authority to Dismiss Federal Agency Officials

Supreme Court Reviews Trump's Authority to Dismiss Federal Agency Officials

The U.S. Supreme Court is hearing a pivotal case, Trump v. Slaughter, which questions President Trump's authority to dismiss members of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) without cause. This case arose after Trump fired Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, a Democratic appointee, citing her actions as inconsistent with his administration's priorities. The case challenges a longstanding legal precedent that protects the independence of federal agencies from direct presidential control. A lower court previously ruled Slaughter's removal illegal, prompting the Trump administration to appeal. The Supreme Court's decision could redefine the boundaries of presidential power over independent agencies.

Supreme Court Considers Case Impacting President Trump's Authority Over FTC

Supreme Court Considers Case Impacting President Trump's Authority Over FTC

The Supreme Court is currently deliberating a case that could significantly enhance President Trump's authority over the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The case centers on whether President Trump can dismiss Rebecca Slaughter, an FTC commissioner, not for cause but because she allegedly does not align with his administration's agenda. This legal question challenges the traditional independence of federal agencies, which are typically insulated from direct presidential control to ensure unbiased regulatory oversight. The case has drawn attention from legal experts, including law professor and former assistant U.S. attorney Kim Wehle, who have weighed in on the potential implications for the balance of power between the executive branch and independent regulatory bodies.