Explore

Justice Brett Kavanaugh's Influence on Supreme Court Reflects Antonin Scalia's Legacy

Justice Brett Kavanaugh's Influence on Supreme Court Reflects Antonin Scalia's Legacy

Justice Brett Kavanaugh, along with other conservative justices appointed by President Trump, has been significantly influenced by the judicial philosophy of the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Scalia's originalist and textualist methods have become increasingly prominent in the Supreme Court, shaping major decisions such as the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022. This approach interprets the Constitution based on its original 18th-century understanding and emphasizes the text of statutes over legislative history. The influence of Scalia's methods is evident in the current conservative majority on the court, which includes Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Clarence Thomas, all of whom frequently reference Scalia's opinions in their rulings.

Fifth Circuit Court Upholds Trump Administration's Immigrant Detention Policy

Fifth Circuit Court Upholds Trump Administration's Immigrant Detention Policy

The Fifth Circuit Court has ruled in favor of the Trump administration's policy allowing the detention of noncitizens arrested within the U.S. without the opportunity for a bond hearing. This decision supports the administration's interpretation of immigration detention statutes, which has been a point of contention. The ruling, authored by Judge Edith Jones, argues that the statute's text supports the administration's stance, despite decades of contrary practice. Judge Dana Douglas dissented, highlighting the human impact and legal inconsistencies of the decision.

Senator Warren presses Trump over DOJ probe of Fed Chair Powell

Senator Warren presses Trump over DOJ probe of Fed Chair Powell

By Ann Saphir and Andrea Shalal Feb 6 (Reuters) - U.S.

Lawsuit challenges DeSantis' authority to call special session for redistricting

Lawsuit challenges DeSantis' authority to call special session for redistricting

A lawsuit claims Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis lacks the authority to call a special session to redraw congressional maps mid-decade

President Trump's Tariff Strategy Faces Supreme Court Scrutiny

President Trump's Tariff Strategy Faces Supreme Court Scrutiny

The Trump administration's use of tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) is under review by the U.S. Supreme Court. The case, Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, will determine the extent of presidential power to impose broad tariffs under emergency powers. Meanwhile, the administration continues to utilize established tariff authorities, such as Section 232 and Section 301, to impose duties on specific sectors and products. These sections allow for tariffs based on national security and unfair trade practices, respectively. The administration's reliance on these tools underscores its commitment to using tariffs as a key component of trade policy, despite the pending legal challenge.

High Court of Justice Supports Government's Non-Competitive Appointment of Civil Service Commissioner

High Court of Justice Supports Government's Non-Competitive Appointment of Civil Service Commissioner

The High Court of Justice has ruled that the Israeli government is not obligated to appoint a civil service commissioner (CSC) through a competitive process, overturning a previous decision by Supreme Court President Isaac Amit. The Civil Service Law allows the government to appoint the commissioner without a tender, traditionally using a special appointments committee led by a retired judge and public representatives. Justice David Mintz, writing for the majority, stated there was no legal basis to alter the existing law, although it does not prevent a competitive process if deemed appropriate. The court also reinforced a 2018 decision requiring a permanent appointment method. In contrast, the minority opinion, led by Amit and Justice Daphne Barak-Erez, argued that the lack of a formal tender should not negate the need for a competitive process, suggesting that the current system allows excessive political influence, particularly from the prime minister.

Judge Questions Pentagon's Censure of Sen. Mark Kelly Over Video

Judge Questions Pentagon's Censure of Sen. Mark Kelly Over Video

A federal judge in Washington has expressed skepticism over the Pentagon's decision to censure Sen. Mark Kelly for his involvement in a video urging troops to resist unlawful orders from the Trump administration. The judge, Richard Leon, questioned the legal basis for the Pentagon's actions, noting the lack of Supreme Court precedent supporting such censure. Kelly, a retired Navy pilot, argues that the censure violates his First Amendment rights. The Pentagon's actions could lead to Kelly's demotion and reduced retirement pay. The case highlights tensions between military regulations and free speech rights, particularly for retired service members.

Slotkin rejects Justice Department request for interview on Democrats' video about 'illegal orders'

Slotkin rejects Justice Department request for interview on Democrats' video about 'illegal orders'

Sen_ Elissa Slotkin of Michigan says she won't sit for an interview with the Justice Department regarding a probe into a video she organized urging U_S_ military members to resist “illegal orders.”

Federal Judges Criticize President Trump's Immigration Policies Amid Legal Challenges

Federal Judges Criticize President Trump's Immigration Policies Amid Legal Challenges

Federal judges across the United States are increasingly vocal in their criticism of President Trump's immigration policies, particularly regarding the treatment of immigrants and the administration's approach to legal procedures. Judges have expressed moral indignation and frustration over what they perceive as federal overreach and disregard for constitutional values. Notably, Judge William G. Young of Boston criticized the administration for breaching the First Amendment by deporting legal residents who advocated for Palestinians. Similarly, Judge Fred Biery of San Antonio condemned the detention of a five-year-old child by immigration agents, describing the government's actions as traumatizing. These judicial rebukes highlight a growing trend of legal resistance against the administration's policies, although the Supreme Court has largely sided with President Trump in related cases.

Supreme Court allows new California congressional districts that favor Democrats

Supreme Court allows new California congressional districts that favor Democrats

The Supreme Court has allowed California to use a new voter-approved congressional map that is favorable to Democrats in this year’s elections, rejecting a last-ditch plea from state Republicans and the Trump administration

A half-century of US-Russian arms control ends with the expiration of the New START nuclear pact

A half-century of US-Russian arms control ends with the expiration of the New START nuclear pact

The Kremlin says it views the expiration of the last remaining nuclear arms pact between Russia and the U.S. with regret, leaving no caps on the two largest atomic arsenals for the first time in over 50 years

The last US-Russia nuclear pact expires, prompting fears of a new arms race

The last US-Russia nuclear pact expires, prompting fears of a new arms race

The last remaining nuclear arms pact between Russia and the United States has expired, removing caps on their atomic arsenals for the first time in over 50 years