Supreme Court Faces Criticism Over Use of Investigative Hypnosis in Texas Case
The Supreme Court is under scrutiny following a brief filed by magicians Penn & Teller, which questions the use of 'investigative hypnosis' in a Texas death-penalty case. This method, which has been criticized for its lack of scientific reliability, is being challenged as part of a broader discussion on the admissibility of certain types of evidence in court. The case has drawn attention due to its potential implications for the use of controversial techniques in legal proceedings. Additionally, the Supreme Court is set to address other significant issues, including the processing of tariff refunds following a decision that invalidated tariffs imposed by President Trump. 
