The Supreme Court agreed Friday to consider President Donald Trump’s ban on asylum at the southern border, a pillar of the Republican president’s far-reaching crackdown on immigration.
The Trump administration wants to overturn lower court decisions that found the executive order banning asylum applications is illegal.
Democrats are preparing an onslaught of probes into the Trump administration. Investigations into the federal government’s purchase
of an immigration detention facility in Minnesota, whether Robert F. Kennedy Jr. lied to Congress about his 2019 trip to Samoa and several others have been announced.
Democratic lawmakers are in Denver for their What’s Next conference, hosted by a new group called Majority Democrats, to revel in their gains and consider their legislative priorities.
Here's the Latest:
Secretary of State Marco Rubio is poised to assail the use of international law and standards to deprive nations like the U.S. of their sovereignty in a speech defending America’s right to act in its own interests.
Rubio plans to criticize “global bureaucrats and activist judges” who use the rules-based international order to promote universal values, according to excerpts of the speech that he will deliver later Friday to the conservative Federalist Society.
Rubio will in particular attack the International Criminal Court for attempting to bring the United States, which is not a party to the tribunal, under its jurisdiction. Rubio has vowed to dismantle the court unless it takes dramatic action to abandon investigations and attempted prosecutions into U.S. citizens of the citizens of U.S.-allied nations that are also not members.
Beyond the ICC, Rubio is set to denounce an interpretation of international law by a “global elite” to try to constrain American power and raise questions about “whether Americans have a moral right to exist as a distinct nation and people.”
The Supreme Court agreed Friday to consider President Donald Trump’s ban on asylum at the southern border, a pillar of the Republican president’s far-reaching crackdown on immigration.
The Trump administration wants to overturn lower court decisions that found the executive order banning asylum applications is illegal.
Federal law gives people the right to seek asylum if they fear persecution in their home countries, no matter how they arrived in the U.S.
At the same time, it also allows the executive branch to decide whether people are granted asylum. The Trump administration argues it can categorically deny asylum to migrants covered by the order and should not have to accept applications destined to be rejected.
Federal attorneys say long yearslong processing times had previously contributed to a major influx of migrants at the southern border as many were released into the country while awaiting a decision.
But immigration attorneys at the American Civil Liberties Union and National Immigrant Justice Center counter that border crossings were already falling before Trump took office.
They say his executive order is an attempt to unilaterally “eviscerate” legal protections aimed at protecting people fleeing danger in their home countries.
Democrat Aaron Ford told Reno-based KOLO-TV that he changed his position on Nevada joining the national popular vote movement after doing more research and finding that the Electoral College has “racist underpinnings.”
The state’s first Black governor also noted that it has allowed some candidates to become president despite losing the popular vote nationally – most recently Republicans Donald Trump in 2016 and George W. Bush in 2000.
Nevada was one of six states where Democrats won full control of the legislature and governor’s office in the midterm elections. Those states represent a total of 71 Electoral College votes.
The 18 states that are currently part of the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact represent 222 of the 270 Electoral College votes needed to win the presidency. Under the plan, the states would allocate their electoral votes to the winner of the popular vote.
It is certain to face legal challenges that would likely land before the U.S. Supreme Court.
The chair of the House Foreign Relations Committee wants Nvidia’s general counsel and a senior Commerce Department official to appear before Congress.
Rep. Brian Mast’s letter this week to Jeff Kessler, undersecretary of commerce for industry and security, seeks a Dec. 2 hearing on computer chip smuggling and “reported interference by private companies into export control policies and enforcement investigations.”
Mast also wants Nvidia chief counsel Tim Teter to appear the same day for a closed-door interview about similar reports. Mast’s letter warns failing to cooperate would lead to a subpoena.
The Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security in 2024 began investigating Megaspeed International, whose CEO has been accused of spying for China and had an affair with then-Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.
The bureau later handed off the investigation to the Justice Department. A person familiar with the bureau’s investigation denied any intervention from Nvidia. The person wasn’t authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity.
As Jeffries began to speak, a handful of activists stood up and began yelling at him, demanding action on a Green New Deal and an arms embargo against Israel.
The audience booed them and chanted “Hakeem!” as the activists slowly left the hall, yelling “You don’t even care about us!”
Jeffries is speaking at the “What’s Next” conference in Denver, where Democrats are discussing how to hold onto the power voters gave them last week.
As Jeffries and moderator Jessica Tarlov continued their conversation, Jeffries was repeatedly interrupted.
A woman in the audience shouted “Nobody trusts you!”
A few minutes later, as Jeffries laid out his vision of how to get to universal healthcare. One man stood up and yelled, “The American people demand impeachment!” He continued to shout profanities at Jeffries, and as he was led out, another man stood up and began yelling at the Democratic leader.
“I’m from Brooklyn, this is light work,” Jeffries said.
The Pentagon watchdog says multiple Navy personnel assigned to the office that provides medical care to Congress and the Supreme Court requested “health and safety transfers” and a formal complaint was filed, reinforcing “the need to strengthen oversight.”
The inspector general’s report also says investigators weren’t able to confirm the Office of the Attending Physician’s pharmacy had undergone regular inspections. It says a lack of Pentagon oversight of the office’s clinical quality management and pharmacy operations increases risks to patients and Navy medical personnel.
The report follows the sudden departure of Dr. Brian Monahan, a Navy rear admiral and the office’s attending physician. The Navy is investigating but didn’t announce the departure.
The watchdog says Monahan, who held the post for 18 years, recused himself from the investigation.
“The recusal of the senior-most official in the OAP also significantly limited our ability to identify potential issues, deficiencies, and areas for improvement,” the report said.
When Democrats take over Congress in January, one of their many oversight targets will be Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Some high-ranking lawmakers have suggested impeaching him for his overhaul of longstanding vaccine guidance and cuts to medical research. But those efforts could conflict with another growing priority for many lawmakers on the left: nurturing common ground to secure support from Kennedy’s Make America Healthy Again followers.
It could prove a difficult balance, since many MAHA activists still view Kennedy as their closest ally.
“It’s an unenviable position for Democrats to be in,” said Matt Motta, a professor at Boston University School of Public Health.
Sen. Maggie Hassan, who expects to chair the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, said the $495 million paid to buy an immigration detention facility in Minnesota was about six times more than the price offered to the state, which it declined to pay.
Hassan called on Secretary Markwayne Mullin to preserve all documents related to the purchase as the committee probes whether spending by the Department of Homeland Security was subject to “improper influence, corruption, or other violations of federal law.”
She sent a similar letter to CoreCivic, the private company that sold the facility. A company statement said the price reflected what it would cost to build the facility at today’s construction prices, minus depreciation, and was determined following an independent appraisal.
The Democratic senator is a two term incumbent who previously represented Maryland in the House and in the legislature.
An attorney and legislator, Van Hollen was born in Karachi, Pakistan, amid his parents’ diplomatic service there, and captured attention when he pushed back against the administration’s immigration agenda.
He traveled some 2,000 miles to El Salvador to meet with the wrongly deported Kilmar Abrego Garcia, helping to establish hope and momentum for Abrego Garcia’s family in Maryland as well as the overall anti-Trump resistance.
Tomorrow Together is investing $1.1 million to shape how to talk with voters about artificial intelligence, deepening its investment on an issue party leaders believe creates a stark contrast with Trump’s opposition to regulating the powerful technology.
It’s one of several Democratic groups that tried to counter the industry’s huge campaign war chest during the midterms. It pushed for new limits on AI and data centers and spent $6.5 million on candidates calling for more regulation amid fresh warnings that the technology poses existential risks to humans.
“Getting this right is going to be critical to winning people’s votes,” said Maddie Kriger, the group’s chief program officer. “It’s also not out of the realm of possibility we will see more and worse AI incidents in the next year, and we want to be prepared to move to help people and take action if that does happen.”
▶ Read more
Immigration raids in late September sparked outrage after federal agents caused fear and disruption in the Dodge City, Kansas, area, a hub for the U.S. meatpacking industry. Voters turned out to rebuke the crackdown, helping to elect a Democratic U.S. senator from Kansas for the first time in nearly a century.
Trump has sent mixed messages on immigration enforcement since Democrats won back control of Congress, suggesting his approach to deportations was too harsh for voters while also promoting hard-liner Stephen Miller as his chief of staff. Both parties will be recalibrating their approach ahead of the next presidential campaign.
In this traditionally Republican corner of Kansas, the raids ignited a maelstrom of rage and turned many who had been apathetic into determined voters.
▶ Read more
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said he’s frustrated with the Commerce Department’s delay in controlling the export of advanced Nvidia chips to China.
Bessent said on CNBC Friday that the Treasury, State and Defense departments as well as the U.S. Trade Representative were in favor of adding Nvidia partner Megaspeed to an export control list for months, but that the Commerce Department was in charge of the matter.
“I am frustrated when President Trump made it very clear China should not receive any Nvidia chips above H100s,” Bessent said.
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang resigned Thursday after acknowledging an affair with former Megaspeed executive Alice Huang, who U.S. intelligence reportedly suspects to be a Chinese spy.
The GOP-led Senate Banking Committee sent letters Thursday seeking testimony from Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Jensen Huang about the department’s role and the national security implications of Nvidia chip sales to China.
Ohio Sen.-elect Sherrod Brown said Senate Majority Leader is a difficult job, experience is necessary and Schumer has proven himself with legislative successes when they held the Senate under President Joe Biden.
“Why would you fire the manager when you just won the World Series?” posted Maine Sen. Angus King. “Chuck Schumer is one of the principal architects of the most successful election in modern history, and I see no reason to change the leadership that helped make that success possible.”
Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., posted Thursday evening that Schumer was key in “securing a historic majority. I will be supporting him as our Democratic leader.”
While most Democratic senators have either said they are supporting Schumer or are undecided, Van Hollen has at least two backers: Sen.-elect Abdul El-Sayed of Michigan, who won a competitive election in his state last week, and progressive standard-bearer Bernie Sanders.
El-Sayed posted on X Thursday night that their majority will need “bold leadership.”
“I called on Sen. @ChrisVanHollen to lead our caucus as a candidate back in April because he leads with courage and experience,” El-Sayed wrote. “We need both right now. Which is why I’m proud to stand with him in his bid to lead our Senate majority.”
Sen. Sanders posted Thursday night that the American people “want a Democratic Party that will stand up to powerful special interests, take on the billionaire class and fight for working families. That is why I am supporting Senator Chris Van Hollen to lead Senate Democrats.”
Divisions over Schumer have simmered over the last two years, since he sided with Republicans on a spending vote in 2025.
Even as Schumer has redeemed himself within his caucus since then — leading them through a government shutdown last year and orchestrating huge wins in the election — many in the Democratic base are agitating for generational change.
Van Hollen, 67, is not that much younger than Schumer, 75, but he’s positioned himself as a new face and said he’s considering a run for president.
Schumer has been working with Democratic senators one-on-one to form an agenda for 2027 that includes healthcare and tariff legislation and efforts to stop the Iran war.
In a statement after Van Hollen’s announcement, Schumer said he welcomes any discussion about the future of the caucus.
“I’m proud of what we’ve accomplished together — 55 seats and counting is an amazing result — and I have the votes to continue serving as Democratic Leader,” Schumer said. “I look forward to leading our new Democratic majority and delivering for the American people.”
“The American people called for change,” Van Hollen said as he announced his challenge of Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer.
“It’s now on us to meet this moment, and to do that we need new leadership,” Van Hollen said. “This is not about any one person — it’s about answering the call of the American people. That is why I’m running for Senate Majority Leader.”
The question of whether to reelect Schumer has already divided the caucus and many senators have declined to say publicly how they will vote. In private deliberations about what message to take from the election, many are torn — Schumer recruited many of the party’s winning candidates and raised money for them, but progressive groups are pushing for his removal.
Few echoed Trump’s argument in a social media post this week that there were problems with the election. In conceding her closely fought Senate contest in Mississippi, Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith said she would “respect the decision” of voters.
And several Republicans, including Sens. Joni Ernst of Iowa, Tim Scott of South Carolina and John Cornyn of Texas and Rep. Mike Lawler of New York, posted pictures of incoming Democrats in a nod toward postelection unity.
Rep. James Comer of Kentucky meanwhile pushed back against White House warnings that oversight could amount to “blatant criminality.”
“Regardless of who is in the White House, there’s always going to be a strong desire for the Oversight Committee to be a check and balance on the executive branch,” said Comer, who oversaw extensive investigations of Democratic President Joe Biden as House Oversight chairman.
It’s perhaps their biggest question going forward. Trump’s policies on trade and the war in Iran contributed to voter discontent with the GOP, and now that he’s in the last two years of his second term, the election defeats challenge the durability of his Make America Great Again movement.
But House Republicans showed no rush to distance themselves from the president as even his critics helped block an effort to impeach Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
Only Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie, who led the push alongside Democrats, broke ranks.
“What I found out tonight is they still haven’t broken from the spell of Donald Trump,” Massie said after the vote. “He still controls this conference.”
Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., unsuccessfully sought to delay his party’s leadership elections in the Senate, arguing for a different approach.
“You cut rural healthcare spending, when you abandon pro-lifers, when you abandon the poor, when you abandon the needy, when you abandon working people, you’re gonna get your butt kicked,” Hawley said. “And you’re gonna deserve it.”
Hawley and a small group of conservatives huddled for hours in the Old Senate Chamber arguing for a consideration of alternatives to John Thune of South Dakota. But no one came forward.
“It’s a bad job,” Hawley acknowledged before Republicans ultimately backed Thune without so much as a voice vote.
“We’re going to let our leader be the leader,” said Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, who will lead party efforts to regain seats in 2028.
Republicans are weighing how to proceed, balancing calls for moderation against an impulse for hard-line positions that might reenergize the party’s base. Each chamber took different tracks, previewing divisions that may lie ahead.
In the House, the Republicans who will remain in Washington next year largely represent staunchly conservative districts where Trump remains popular. Their decision to elect Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan as their next leader reflected a fighting stance.
Jordan is a co-founder of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, currently chairs the Judiciary Committee and has previously chaired the Oversight Committee. From those positions, he’s waged heated fights against Democrats and become a top Trump ally.
“The way that Jim fights says a lot about where this conference is,” said Rep. Brian Mast, R-Fla.
There was widespread frustration that Republicans who were awarded full control of the White House and Congress just two years earlier had lost touch with voters.
“We collectively failed,” said Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., who is trailing her Democratic challenger in a district Republicans carried by more than 18 percentage points in 2024. “The American people let us know we have failed in this governing experience for this Congress.”
The anger is sharp in part because of the rosy predictions from top Republicans ahead of the election. House Speaker Mike Johnson had insisted the polls were wrong and Republicans would retain their majority. Back on Capitol Hill this week, Johnson blamed voters, saying they made the “wrong choice.”
Rep. Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., who is also trailing a Democratic rival, said people kept telling her she couldn’t lose. But she knew otherwise.
“I couldn’t get anybody to listen to me,” she said. “People just didn’t think it could happen, but we knew it could.”
