When Donald Trump returned to the White House for his second term, many assumed Benjamin Netanyahu had found his strongest ally yet.
Trump backed Israel through the Iran war, repeatedly defended its military
actions, and positioned himself as one of the most pro-Israel presidents in modern US history. But a series of developments over the past two months, culminating in an explosive phone call over Lebanon this week, suggests the relationship may be entering a more complicated phase.
According to Axios, Trump erupted at Netanyahu during a June 1 phone call after Israel threatened to expand military operations in Lebanon and strike targets in Beirut. Citing US officials familiar with the conversation, Axios reported that Trump accused the Israeli prime minister of jeopardising broader American interests in the region and warned that further escalation would leave Israel increasingly isolated.
ALSO READ | Is Israel Struggling To Influence Trump On Iran Deal? Netanyahu Finds ‘No Room For Maneuver’
A US official briefed on the call quoted Trump as saying: “You’re f***ing crazy. You’d be in prison if it weren’t for me. I’m saving your a**. Everybody hates you now. Everybody hates Israel because of this.” Another source said Trump was visibly furious and at one point shouted at Netanyahu, asking: “What the f*** are you doing?”
The exchange was remarkable not just for its language, but for what it revealed: for perhaps the first time since Trump’s return to office, Washington’s diplomatic priorities appear to be colliding with Netanyahu’s military strategy.
From Political Soulmates To Strategic Differences
The Trump-Netanyahu relationship has long been portrayed as one of the closest partnerships between an American president and an Israeli prime minister.
During Trump’s first term, the US recognised Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, moved its embassy there, recognised Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights and brokered the Abraham Accords. Netanyahu often described Trump as Israel’s greatest friend in the White House.
ALSO READ | Trump, Netanyahu Hold ‘Prolonged, Dramatic’ Call As Iran Tensions Fuel Speculation Over Next Steps
Even after Trump returned to office in 2025, the two leaders initially appeared aligned on almost every major issue, particularly Iran.
However, Axios, quoting sources, says tensions have been building for weeks. On May 20, Axios reported that a phone call between the two leaders over a potential Iran agreement had become unusually difficult, with one source describing Netanyahu as having his “hair on fire” over Trump’s pursuit of diplomacy with Tehran.
The disagreement has become increasingly clear—Netanyahu sees Iran primarily as a military threat to be contained through pressure, while Trump increasingly appears interested in converting battlefield gains into a broader diplomatic settlement.
Lebanon Became The Breaking Point
The latest clash centred on Lebanon, but the dispute was really about Iran.
According to Axios, Trump’s anger was driven by concerns that Israeli escalation against Hezbollah could derail ongoing US-Iran negotiations. Tehran had reportedly warned that continued Israeli attacks in Lebanon could jeopardise talks with Washington.
This is not the first time Trump has tried to restrain Netanyahu on Lebanon.
In an interview with Axios in April, Trump said he had urged Netanyahu to limit Israeli action to “surgical” operations and avoid a broader war. At the time, Washington was trying to preserve a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah while also opening direct talks between Israel and Lebanon.
Reuters reported in April that the Trump administration had brokered a 10-day ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon and pushed both sides towards direct negotiations in the most significant diplomatic engagement between the two countries in decades.
For Trump, Lebanon is no longer a separate conflict. It has become tied to a much larger objective: stabilising the region sufficiently to secure a broader understanding with Iran.
ALSO READ | What Is Iran’s ‘Assassination Bill’ That Proposes A $58-Million Bounty On Trump, Netanyahu?
That explains why Washington reacted so sharply when Netanyahu threatened strikes on Beirut.
Trump’s New Middle East Doctrine
The irony is that Trump remains one of Israel’s strongest supporters.
The latest dispute does not resemble the ideological clashes that defined relations between Netanyahu and former presidents such as Barack Obama or Joe Biden. Instead, the disagreement is tactical.
Trump appears convinced that the military phase of the regional conflict has already achieved most of its objectives. His focus now is on turning those gains into diplomatic agreements.
In recent weeks, US officials have pursued multiple tracks simultaneously: preserving the Iran ceasefire, advancing indirect talks with Tehran, maintaining the Lebanon ceasefire and encouraging direct Israel-Lebanon negotiations.
From the White House perspective, every new Israeli escalation threatens to unravel months of diplomatic work. Netanyahu, however, sees matters differently.
ALSO READ | Allies at Odds? Netanyahu Wanted Iran Uprising, Here’s Why Trump Said No
The Israeli prime minister has repeatedly argued that Hezbollah remains a threat, that Iran cannot be trusted and that military pressure should continue until Israel’s security objectives are fully achieved. Reuters reported this week that even after Trump’s intervention, Netanyahu publicly insisted Israel’s policy towards Hezbollah had not changed and that military operations would continue where necessary.
Why This Matters Beyond Lebanon
The significance of the dispute lies less in the immediate crisis and more in what it says about the future of the alliance.
Historically, US-Israel disagreements have often revolved around settlements, Palestinian statehood or peace talks. This time, the disagreement is over strategy itself.
Trump increasingly sees himself as a dealmaker seeking to reshape the Middle East through negotiated settlements. Netanyahu remains focused on defeating Iran’s regional network before discussing long-term political arrangements.
That gap is becoming harder to paper over.
Axios reported that US officials described this week’s phone call as one of the worst exchanges between the two leaders since Trump’s return to office. One official told the publication that Trump believed Netanyahu’s actions were undermining not just ceasefire efforts but America’s broader diplomatic objectives in the region.
Is The Alliance In Trouble?
Not really. Military cooperation remains intact, intelligence sharing continues, and US support for Israel’s security has not fundamentally changed. The relationship is still far stronger than many previous periods of US-Israel tension.
But what appears to be changing is the assumption that Trump will automatically endorse every Israeli military move.
For months, the White House has quietly pushed Netanyahu towards ceasefires, negotiations and de-escalation in Lebanon. The latest confrontation suggests Washington is now willing to apply pressure when it believes Israeli actions threaten wider American interests.
That does not amount to a rupture. It does, however, suggest that the Trump-Netanyahu partnership is evolving from one built on almost complete strategic alignment into one increasingly shaped by competing visions for what comes after the wars.
The real question is no longer whether Trump supports Israel but whether Trump and Netanyahu still agree on how the Middle East should look when the fighting finally stops.
