Aid Cut Announced
The Trump administration moved to cancel $4.9 billion in foreign aid previously approved by Congress. This cancellation impacts funding for development
assistance, the UN, international peacekeeping, and promoting democratic values. The administration's actions have been met with mixed reactions globally. This includes cutting funds for global health and HIV/AIDS programs, initiatives that previously attempted to be frozen.
Pocket Rescission Explained
The administration employed a 'pocket rescission', a tool allowing a president to request Congress not spend already authorized funds, usually towards the fiscal year's end (September 30th). It is the first time in almost five decades a U.S. president utilized this. This aligns with a broader trend of expanding executive control in the federal government and is seen as bypassing Congress.
Funds Impacted Areas
The rescinded funds included $3.2 billion for development assistance grants, $520 million for the United Nations, $838 million for international peacekeeping, and $322 million for democracy promotion. This included funding for critical global health initiatives and HIV/AIDS programs, reflecting a shift in priorities. Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged the agency’s shutdown on social media.
Wider Implications Considered
The actions have led to legal challenges about presidential power boundaries. The administration also appealed to the Supreme Court to block rulings preserving certain aid programs. The dismantling of USAID, and its transfer to the State Department reflects the changes in the government. This move could set a precedent enabling future presidents to sidestep Congress on spending.
Past Actions Reviewed
During his tenure, the former US President dismissed federal employees, raised tariffs without congressional approval, and challenged institutions. The administration announced plans to eliminate nearly all of USAID’s foreign assistance contracts, amounting to around $60 billion in global aid. Many of these decisions sparked legal battles regarding the limits of presidential power.
