What's Happening?
The 1987 science fiction film 'Predator,' starring Arnold Schwarzenegger, was initially considered as a sequel to his 1985 action hit 'Commando.' According to comic book writer and screenwriter Jeph Loeb, who was involved in the project, the studio had
acquired the 'Predator' script and believed it would be more successful as 'Commando 2.' Loeb revealed that if one watches 'Commando' and then 'Predator,' it becomes apparent that Schwarzenegger's character in both films, despite having different names, is essentially the same individual, John Matrix from 'Commando.' He even noted that Schwarzenegger wears the same camouflage suit in both movies and that he possesses a version of the 'Predator' script labeled 'Commando 2.' However, producers ultimately decided against this approach, recognizing the standalone potential of the 'Predator' script. This decision was influenced by the prevailing trend at the time where sequels typically generated only half the revenue of their predecessors, with 'Star Wars' being a notable exception.
Why It's Important?
This revelation highlights a significant turning point in Hollywood's approach to franchise development during the 1980s. The decision to release 'Predator' as an original film rather than a sequel to 'Commando' allowed both movies to establish their own distinct identities and legacies. 'Predator' went on to become a cult classic and spawned a successful franchise, demonstrating the commercial viability of original science fiction concepts. Had it been branded as 'Commando 2,' its reception and subsequent trajectory might have been entirely different, potentially limiting its impact and the development of its unique mythology. This also underscores the strategic considerations studios make regarding intellectual property and market trends, particularly the perceived risk of diminishing returns from sequels. The success of 'Predator' as an independent entity likely encouraged studios to invest in new, original stories rather than solely relying on established franchises, contributing to the diverse cinematic landscape of the era.
What's Next?
While the decision regarding 'Predator' was made decades ago, its impact continues to resonate in the film industry's approach to intellectual property. The success of 'Predator' as a standalone film, which ultimately out-grossed 'Commando,' demonstrated the value of original content and the potential for new franchises to emerge. This historical context informs current studio strategies, where there is a constant balance between developing new intellectual properties and extending existing ones. Future discussions around film development and franchise planning will continue to weigh the benefits of creating original content against the perceived safety of sequels, prequels, and reboots. The 'Predator' franchise itself has continued to evolve with multiple films and crossovers, showcasing the enduring appeal of its core concept, independent of its initial 'Commando' connection.
Beyond the Headlines
The story of 'Predator' nearly becoming 'Commando 2' offers a fascinating glimpse into the creative and commercial pressures that shape film production. It illustrates how seemingly minor decisions can have profound long-term effects on cultural phenomena. The concept of a shared cinematic universe, now a common strategy in Hollywood, was implicitly considered and then rejected in this instance. This decision allowed 'Predator' to develop its own distinct lore and fan base, free from the narrative constraints of 'Commando.' It also speaks to the evolution of audience expectations; while sequels are now often highly anticipated, there was a period when they were viewed with skepticism. This historical anecdote serves as a reminder of the dynamic nature of the film industry and the often-unforeseen paths that lead to iconic cinematic creations.
