The resolution raised concerns over alleged irregularities in the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. It questioned the reported removal
of eligible voters without proper notice or clear criteria. The Assembly also sought changes to the committee responsible for appointing the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners.
Read more: ‘This is people’s movement’: Rahul Gandhi on ongoing protests in national capital
Why is Keralam seeking Gyanesh Kumar’s removal?
The resolution alleged that the voter list revision exercise could affect the voting rights of marginalised communities, minorities, migrant workers and young voters.
It also referred to media reports claiming that the Election Commission had restricted the authority of Electoral Registration Officers through software systems and made changes to Form 6 contrary to existing rules.
According to ANI, the resolution called for correcting these alleged irregularities and restoring the names of eligible voters removed from electoral rolls.
Read more: SIR protests: Delhi Police register 25 FIRs since October 2
BJP opposes resolution, questions allegations against Election Commission
Three BJP members opposed the resolution. BJP MLA V Muraleedharan moved amendments challenging allegations made against the Election Commission.
Referring to the claim concerning Form 6, Muraleedharan said, “This media report has been pointed out as incorrect by the Election Commission itself.”
He also proposed adding a statement condemning attempts by vested interests to discredit the Election Commission.
Read more: CJI Surya Kant rejects INDIA Bloc’s meeting request ahead of march over SIR, CEC: Sources
What changes does the resolution seek?
The Assembly called for restructuring the committee that appoints the Chief Election Commissioner and Election Commissioners.
It proposed a selection panel comprising the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha and the Chief Justice of India.
The resolution argued that removing the Chief Justice from the selection process had raised questions about the independence of appointments.
Read more: CJP accuses Delhi authorities of imposing ‘open emergency’ amid protest crackdown
Can the Keralam Assembly remove Gyanesh Kumar?
The resolution itself cannot remove the Chief Election Commissioner. Under Article 324(5) of the Constitution, the CEC can be removed only through the same procedure used for removing a Supreme Court judge.
This requires a special majority in both Houses of Parliament, followed by an order from the President. The constitutional grounds are proven misbehaviour or incapacity.
The Assembly’s decision brings fresh political attention to the Election Commission’s handling of electoral rolls. The allegations cited in the resolution remain contested, and any formal attempt to remove Gyanesh Kumar would have to follow the parliamentary procedure.
