In the low tide between the regular season/championship games and bowl season, I wanted to take a look at what it took to beat Clemson this year. Was it just luck? A specific unit falling apart? Joe Burrow
and that 2019 WR corps? A Travis Henry RB that ran it 40 times per game? “Not playing complimentary football” as we heard all season?
Clemson’s five losses in 2025 — LSU, Georgia Tech, Syracuse, SMU, and Duke — may look, on the surface, like a random mix. Different leagues. Different talent levels. Different styles.
But when you dig into the data, the randomness disappears.
These teams share one unmistakable profile. They don’t beat Clemson in five different ways — they beat Clemson in the same way every single time by exploiting the same clusters of weaknesses again and again.
Here’s that blueprint the numbers revealed.
1. They Throw the Ball Efficiently — Not Deeply, But Efficiently
This is Clemson’s biggest vulnerability. In Clemson wins, opponents average –0.10 EPA per pass, which is strong defensive performance. In losses, that number spikes to +0.20 EPA per pass — a huge half-yard-per-play swing.
For comparison, +0.20 EPA/Pass is the efficiency of the 13th best passing offense in the country — the Georgia Bulldogs.
And here’s the important part: Clemson isn’t getting hit with deep bombs. It’s getting carved up by timing routes:
- 8-yard outs
- 10-yard digs
- RPO glance routes
- Crossers
- Curl/spot concepts
Look at the loss-specific passing efficiency:
- Duke: +0.42 EPA/Pass
- Syracuse: +0.27 EPA/Pass
- LSU: +0.12 EPA/Pass
- SMU: +0.09 EPA/Pass
- Georgia Tech: +0.11 EPA/Pass
These aren’t explosive-air-raid numbers — they’re methodical, chain-moving, rhythm-pass numbers.
Teams beat Clemson by repeatedly exploiting the middle of the field, where Clemson’s linebackers (avg coverage PFF 68) and safeties (avg coverage PFF 62) struggle the most.
2. They Avoid Negative Rushing Plays
This is one of the sneaky stats of Clemson’s season.
Clemson’s run defense is actually very good. Few opponents run efficiently in a traditional sense. But the teams that beat Clemson all share one trait:
They don’t let the run game hurt them.
They don’t need to run for 5 yards a carry.
They just need to run for 0 yards per carry instead of –2.
In losses, Clemson’s opponents keep rushing EPA close to neutral. That prevents:
- Second-and-long
- Predictable passing downs
- Clemson’s pass rush getting free
- Clemson’s coverage tightening early in the rep
One simple 4-yard carry per series is enough to keep Clemson off balance.
3. They Force Clemson’s Rushing Attack to Collapse
This is where the Clemson offense falls apart.
In Clemson’s wins, the run game hovers around –0.07 EPA per rush. That’s not good, but it’s survivable.
In losses, Clemson’s rushing EPA plummets to –0.36 EPA per rush. To put this catastrophic number into perspective, it is .010 EPA points worse than the least efficient rushing team in the nation (Charlotte 49ers).
That tanking run efficiency triggers a cascade:
- predictable 2nd-and-long
- Completely ineffective play-action
- more third-and-obvious-pass situations
- forced checkdowns
- stalled drives
Teams didn’t beat Clemson with explosive offense.
They beat Clemson by making Clemson’s own offense one-dimensional.
4. They Win the Field Position Battle — By a Lot
This is one of the biggest behind-the-scenes factors in every loss.
In Clemson wins, the Tigers start around the 32–33 yard line.
In losses, they start around the 26–27 yard line.
That’s a six-yard loss of starting field position on every drive.
But it’s even worse on the defensive side:
- Opponent starting field position in Clemson wins: ~24-yard line
- Opponent starting field position in Clemson losses: ~29–30-yard line
That’s another 5–6 yards ceded to the opponent per drive.
So in losses:
- Clemson’s offense must go 75+ yards to score
- Opponents need only 70 yards
Given Clemson’s offensive struggles with sustained drives — and their defensive struggles with short-field pass efficiency — this field position gap is massive.
This single factor adds roughly 4–6 expected points per game against Clemson in losses.
5. They Finish Drives With Touchdowns, Not Field Goals
This is where all the earlier issues converge.
When Clemson wins, opponents average 3.3 points per quality drive — a number consistent with good red-zone defense. Clemson stiffens inside the 40 and forces field goals.
In losses, opponents average 4.5 points per quality drive — a full 1.2-point increase every time they cross the Clemson 40.
That’s the difference between a field goal and a touchdown.
Touchdown rate tells the same story:
- Opponent TD rate in Clemson wins: ~45%
- Opponent TD rate in Clemson losses: ~65%
The Tigers also allow almost double the intermediate explosive passes in losses — roughly five per game, compared to two per game in wins. These aren’t deep shots. They’re 15–25 yard strikes into the teeth of Clemson’s coverage structure: behind the linebackers, in front of the safeties, or away from safety help.
This is where the LB and Safety play shows up most clearly. Clemson’s safeties and linebackers are being targeted in the exact areas that decide scoring efficiency.
So What Kind of Team Beats Clemson?
When you put the numbers together, Clemson loses to a team with this profile:
1. A quarterback who can hit 6–12 yard throws consistently.
The intermediate passing game is Clemson’s Achilles’ heel.
2. A run game that avoids negative plays.
Neutral rushing is good enough.
3. A defense that disrupts Clemson’s run game.
When Clemson hits –0.30 EPA/Rush, the offense collapses.
4. A team that wins field position.
Opponents starting at the 29 vs the 24 is a huge factor.
5. A team that turns quality drives into touchdowns.
4.5 points per quality drive is the Clemson loss line.
Five different teams.
Five different styles.
One identical blueprint.
This is the profile Clemson must solve for 2026 — because as long as this blueprint exists, opponents will keep using it.
Section 103
We’re excited to share that our sponsor, Section 103, has added a Clemson apparel collection.
Section 103 offers shirt designs based on Clemson traditions, and you can tell they are dialed into what makes Clemson special. Not only do they offer classic designs based on Cadence Count and Howard’s Rock, but they also touch on more obscure Tiger lore like Clemson House (RIP) and Clemson Blue Cheese.
Check out their polos, hats, and stickers too. You can support us by supporting our sponsor and letting them know you heard about them from us with our unique one-time-use promo code for 10% off: STS10
