Earlier this summer, it was announced that NBC Sports will have their analysts located courtside which will allow them to listen in on team huddles. According to Sports Media Watch, this will afford pundits
the opportunity to “provide real-time insights.”
I don’t know how I feel about that.
For one, when TNT used to mic up the coaches, they’d air comments from the bench that were more motivation-based, not strategy-oriented.
Will the sideline reporters be listening and then responding in a way that may give insight into the specifics of a coach’s instruction?
If so, that is quite a movement in dynamics from coach to player to reporter to fan.
There’s an ethical line—albeit a somewhat arbitrary one—when it comes to allowing individuals not directly connected to an organization to listen in on strategic conversations. At the very least, it’s a questionable practice. Think of it like stealing signs in baseball: the whole point of a huddle is to privately discuss the method or strategy for overcoming your opponent. Undermining that privacy compromises the integrity of the process.
If reporters will not be allowed to discuss specifics of the timeouts, then what keen insight can we feasibly expect?
Welcome to the Thread. Join in the conversation, start your own discussion, and share your thoughts. This is the Spurs community, your Spurs community. Thanks for being here.
Our community guidelines apply which should remind everyone to be cool, avoid personal attacks, not to troll and to watch the language.
