Is any player off limits?
With the trade deadline a week away, Giannis Antetokounmpo has become the biggest name to watch on the market, and the Knicks have hovered around the center of the conversation all season.
From a salary standpoint, a one-for-one deal centered on Karl-Anthony Towns is the cleanest match for both teams. But if you’re talking purely basketball, a straight swap tells a different story, with Towns coming up just a tier below Giannis.
Across 13 seasons, Antetokounmpo has posted career
averages of 24 points, 10 rebounds, and five assists per game, along with a steal and a block on a nightly basis.
Towns, over 11 seasons with two franchises, has put up similar numbers, 23 points and 11 rebounds per game, but with less playmaking and defensive impact, averaging three assists and fewer than one steal and block per game.
Karl-Anthony Towns and Giannis Antetokounmpo have built markedly different résumés that reflect their contrasting career arcs. Towns burst into the league as the 2016 NBA Rookie of the Year and has since developed into a perennial All-Star, earning one All-NBA Third Team selection while redefining what is possible offensively for a center. A 2022 NBA Three-Point Contest champion, Towns is widely regarded as the greatest shooting big man in league history, combining volume, efficiency, and range in a way few frontcourt players ever have. Giannis, meanwhile, has authored one of the most decorated careers of his era. The two-time NBA MVP, 2021 NBA champion, and Finals MVP has also captured a Defensive Player of the Year award, made multiple All-NBA First Teams and All-Defensive First Teams, and cemented his legacy with a historic 50-point performance in the championship-clinching game of the 2021 NBA Finals.
At the end of the day, Giannis’s résumé clearly outweighs Towns’s, and if the Bucks balk at a deal centered on him, there are plenty of other scenarios the Knicks could explore. According to ESPN’s Trade Machine, alternative packages could be constructed using nearly any combination of players on the roster, including the possibility of a blockbuster deal built around Jalen Brunson and Mikal Bridges.
A straight-up Giannis-for-Brunson trade isn’t possible, but with other pieces, the captain could, on paper, be moved.
Comparing 1:1, the notion would heavily favor the Knicks in terms of overall talent. Giannis is a generational star, an NBA champion who is capable of dominating every aspect of the game, while Brunson, though an elite point guard and floor leader, can’t match that same level of impact. The Knicks would instantly upgrade their ceiling with a two-time MVP on the roster. The Bucks, meanwhile, would gain a steady, reliable playmaker who can run an offense and score efficiently, but they’d be losing the centerpiece of their franchise.
In pure talent terms, the edge goes to New York, though salary considerations and roster balance, from a long-term strategy, fit, and roster balance perspective, the Bucks could argue they’re getting pieces to rebuild or diversify.
Another trade scenario that works within the trade machine is a 3-for-1 deal that would send OG Anunoby, Mitchell Robinson, and Guerschon Yabusele to the Milwaukee Bucks in exchange for Giannis Antetokounmpo.
From Milwaukee’s side, bringing in Anunoby, Robinson, and Yabusele would add depth, positional balance, and manageable contracts, but it would come at the massive cost of losing their franchise player. Anunoby provides elite two-way wing play and perimeter defense, Robinson offers rim protection and rebounding, and Yabusele adds scoring versatility off the bench. While the Bucks would gain talent at multiple positions, they would be giving up the unique, game-changing impact that Giannis brings every night.
In the end, this type of move would be trading star power for depth and balance, which could put Milwaukee’s ability to contend for a title at risk. It would give the Knicks a true Big Three, even if the idea is extremely unrealistic. While this dream scenario would almost certainly never materialize, it highlights just how many different player combinations the Knicks can realistically explore.
That said, the bigger question remains: should New York explore every possible avenue to land the two-time MVP, even if it means considering moves that would once have seemed unthinkable? And if they do, is anyone, primarily Brunson, truly off limits when it comes to building a team capable of contending for a championship?
