The playoffs are here. After 82 games and 62 wins, the Spurs have an established identity and a set rotation. A big reason for their success has been their depth outside of their main guys. The role players have stepped up, bringing shooting, defense, and playmaking. San Antonio’s top nine is not perfect, but it’s good enough to beat anyone, as they proved in the regular season.
Normally, rotations only tighten up in the playoffs, but it’s not uncommon for someone not in the scouting report to be
asked to fill a small role in case of injury or to make adjustments or counters. So let’s see who the Spurs have at the edges of the rotation and what they could do in the playoffs if called upon to contribute.
The Spurs have some “break in case of emergency” backcourt shooting
Jordan McLaughlin has never really had a rotation spot in the NBA because of his limitations, but early in the season and recently, he has been showing that he can give the team a few solid minutes if needed.
McLaughlin is not particularly big, athletic, or quick, but he has good defensive anticipation and always plays hard. He offers ball handling to start possessions, which helps keep the true initiators fresh, and he can also create in a pinch. But more importantly, he’s been a good three-point shooter.
The former Timberwolf and King shot 42 percent from beyond the arc, continuing a recent trend in his career in which his outside shot seems like a reliable weapon, something that wasn’t true in his beginnings. The volume was small, and not a lot of his attempts came in high-leverage situations because of his role, but it’s safe to say he can make open looks as a spot-up shooter.
The Spurs also have a more versatile but less efficient shooter on the roster. Lindy Waters III shot 34 percent from beyond the arc this year, but on a lot of attempts per minute. He’s been better in past stops, and he can fire on the move. He doesn’t offer much ballhandling, but he understands his role, which explains his extremely low turnover rate in admittedly low minutes.
Backcourt shooting was projected to be one of the Spurs’ biggest weaknesses, and it was an issue at times, but San Antonio has done exceptionally well despite not having many rotation guards whom opponents are afraid to leave open. McLaughlin and Waters III shouldn’t be expected to play much in the postseason, if at all, but it’s good to know that if the team needs some extra shooting in a certain situation, they have those two in the deep bench.
The Spurs have a lot of big men, but not much actual big man depth
The Spurs have five centers on their roster. Victor Wembanyama and Luke Kornet get the rotation minutes, but Kelly Olynyk, Mason Plumlee, and Bismack Biyombo are on the bench every game, which means San Antonio has big bodies to spare. Alas, quantity doesn’t equal quality. Despite the many names, they don’t have a lot of alternatives to throw out there who can either sustain the level of play of the top two guys or offer a different look.
Biyombo is a fantastic human who should not get minutes under any circumstances when the game is on the line. Plumlee has been known to do the little things well, as he can screen, rebound, and keep the ball moving, but at 36, his best defensive years are behind him, and he’s not much of a scoring threat. Olynyk is the most unique of the three, since he can shoot open threes and is a terrific passer, but he’s one of the worst rim protectors among players his size.
The reason why the lack of quality depth has not been a huge problem for the Spurs is not hard to figure out: their top two guys are among the best in the league at their roles. If nothing unexpected happens, Wembanyama will likely see his minutes expanded in the postseason, and Luke Kornet will continue to be an excellent backup who can also share the floor with Wemby at times, for short stints.
If Wemby gets hurt, San Antonio’s chances to make a deep run disappear, no matter who’s behind him in the depth chart, so it’s not necessary to dwell on that scenario. But what happens if Kornet is injured or ineffective? It could be a problem for the Spurs.
Carter Bryant might be more important than the typical 10th man
In the last stretch of the regular season, Harrison Barnes claimed the ninth spot in the rotation, getting a lot more minutes than Carter Bryant, who at one point seemed in contention for the role. It’s not a shock, since Barnes has the playoff experience that the rookie obviously lacks, and despite his inconsistent season, he’s still a 39 percent shooter from beyond the arc on significant volume. Yet while Bryant might get squeezed out of the regular rotation if Mitch Johnson trims it, he could end up being important in some situations.
When he hasn’t had either of his two top big men, Johnson has preferred to go small often, with Bryant as the de facto center for short stretches, allowing the Spurs to be switchable on defense and play five-out on offense. Those units have some question marks in terms of rebounding and rim protection, but considering the alternatives, it’s hard to blame Johnson for preferring them. If opponents go small themselves or the Spurs need a different look, Bryat could get some run.
If the rookie is getting big minutes at the wing, it probably means something went wrong, but he could also have his moments at that slot if the Spurs just need a jolt of athleticism. Bryant might be the 10th man on the rotation, but could also be a factor in specific matchups.
