It’s been broadly hinted by Cubs President of Baseball Operations Jed Hoyer that the Cubs might be moving on from outfielder Seiya Suzuki after the Japanese star had five productive seasons on the North Side.
Here’s what happened at Hoyer’s season-ending news conference:
Hoyer did not go into detail on Suzuki’s situation. Hoyer simply acknowledged that things could look different in 2027, given the volume of free agents the North Siders have both in terms of pitchers and hitters.
“We can’t retain everyone,”
Hoyer said. “The team’s going to look and feel different next year. In a lot of ways, that’s a good thing. But I do want to emphasize that we have a lot of good players who are going to be free agents, and we’ll be in touch.”
Well. Let’s be clear. If the Cubs wanted to retain “everyone,” they could. It’s simply a matter of extending the payroll, something Cubs chairman Tom Ricketts did this year in a “win-now” situation. The Cubs didn’t win, obviously, but why should 2027 not be the same? Does the team want to win every year?
Rhetorical question, I suppose. The article linked above also quoted Suzuki:
“If we’re talking about all the good memories, it’s going to take about three hours. Is that OK?” Suzuki said via his interpreter, Edwin Stanberry. “My first time being in the U.S., it was with Chicago. Just being with the teammates, with the supportive staff, everybody around me that helped me, I enjoyed that. And also with playing at Wrigley, and the fans. They are so passionate. I was really hoping that we could go back to Wrigley and play in front of them.
“But there’s so many good memories. My family, they love Chicago. But with free agency, that’s something new for me. And I think there’s a lot of processes involved with that. So I’m not sure what’s going to happen.”
It does sound like Suzuki would like to stay with the Cubs, though I wouldn’t expect him to give the team any sort of “hometown discount.”
So what would it take to keep Suzuki a Cub? He just finished what is probably overall his best season. His SLG of .473 was almost exactly at his career mark of .472. He set career highs in runs and walks, and by the eye test and also statistically, he had his best defensive season in MLB. That might even put him in the running for a Gold Glove.
Suzuki signed a five-year, $85 million deal with the Cubs just before the 2022 season, an AAV of $17 million. Clearly, he was worth everything the Cubs paid for him and more — beyond his production on the field, he helped raise the team’s profile in Japan. While Shohei Ohtani is obviously the MLB icon in Japan, when I went to the Tokyo Series last year I ran into quite a number of Japanese fans who were big fans of Suzuki. That’s certainly something worth having in addition to his baseball skills.
I think Suzuki will age better than many MLB players as he enters his mid and late 30s. He just turned 32 in August, so signing him to (say) a five-year deal would be his age 32 through age 36 seasons. He’s likely to be oe of the top hitting free agents, if not right at the top of the list.
Bottom line: I don’t think the Cubs can afford to NOT keep Suzuki. They don’t really have any ready replacement for him.
So, without further ado: Would five years and $120 million keep Suzuki in Chicago? Hoyer says he doesn’t want to get into a bidding war, but I do think the Cubs could afford that.
Who says no?
