I know as well as anyone that the Jazz are currently on a 9 game losing streak. I also know quite well that moral victories do not make their way onto the win column. However, I do not think it is necessarily wrong to adjust our expectations as the season makes known the true quality of the team and players that we are working with. So, in a game with 4 injured starters against a full strength Miami Heat, finding miniature successes beyond the tracked win or loss is likely our best bet to both (a)
prevent a full collapse into despair and (b) track where our players currently are, even if they are not where we wish they would be. It was ugly at points, but most of the Jazzmen showed some flash that could theoretically be translated into winning basketball when the stars are aligned and the injury-bug is vanquished.
Note: These grades are more-or-less relative to the player. An A grade for Darryn Peterson is different than an A grade for Tony Bradley.
Ace Bailey: A-
Scientists are still working out the fine details, but the current consensus is clear; Ace Bailey is physically incapable of missing his signature stop-on-a-dime short midrange jump shot. For the first time in what feels like forever, his range extended beyond his sweet spot – despite a poor three point shooting season overall, Ace went 3 for 5 from downtown tonight. His defense left a little bit to be desired, as he was guarding up the lineup and was sometimes physically outmatched in the paint. Additionally, even though his short midrange is near automatic at this point, his lack of free throw attempts become more and more distressing with each passing game – his 0.7 free throw attempts per game average will not be boosted by his game tonight. He was active and efficient, but the areas of improvement for Ace remain clear.
Mo Bamba: C+
Mo stuffed the stat sheet in his 17 minutes – 7 points, 7 rebounds, and 3 blocks is nothing to scoff at. However, it was obvious that Giannis was licking his chops whenever he saw Bamba attempting to guard him out on the perimeter – Mo gave Giannis all the space in the world, which isn’t necessarily a bad idea, but when Giannis hits 3 jump shots in a row, the time to adjust has arrived. However, it seemed that he simply didn’t have the athletic capabilities to throw any other look at the Greek Freak, which sparked the Heat’s run in the third quarter. He still brought value by being a large human located in the paint, but Giannis was clearly not an ideal matchup for him.
Tony Bradley: B
Worse counting stats than Bamba, but the eye test tells me that his impact was a little bit greater. His one block from this game was shocking to someone who remembers how out of shape Bradley was when he first entered the league – he rotated from the other side of the paint to swat Bam Adebayo with a mobility that a Jazz fan from 2018 would relish. Consistently, he seemed to be in the right place at the right time, which matters a lot when he is also consistently the player with the most mass on the court. The other Jazz center options are long and springy but without the size to really hold up in certain matchups, so Bradley operated as a nice change of pace against the burliness of the Heat frontcourt. This isn’t advocating for Bradley to be given more consistent minutes, but he certainly made the most of them tonight.
Isaiah Collier: B+
I originally wrote that this was a tale of two halves for Isaiah Collier, but that doesn’t accurately reflect how rapidly his grade rose as the game progressed – really, a better description would be that this was a tale of 3.5 quarters and 1 miraculous end-of-game revival. Throughout most of the game, Collier was actively and obviously detrimental; the Heat weren’t respecting his three pointer, he wasn’t able to get to the paint consistently to aid the offense through kickouts, and the decision making was jarringly off. However, one of the only moments of real electricity in the Delta Center occurred when Collier drained 4 threes in the 4th quarter and single-handedly dragged the Jazz back into the ball game. He didn’t impact the game in a very sustainable way, to be sure; I’m not sure if he’ll ever again have a three point shooting game this good in his career, and his bread-and-butter value adds (passing, paint pressure) just weren’t clicking. However, sustainable or not, going 4/4 from three in the fourth quarter made this contest competitive and ignited an otherwise stagnant Jazz offense.
Kyle Filipowski: B
Filipowski snags a solid grade simply for not making very many mistakes. His presence was not always actively felt, to be sure, but if you watched him with any intentionality you could tell that the team functioned just a bit better with him on the court. He makes quick decisions, he has the ability (or at least the semblance of it) to dribble+pass+shoot, and he brings one of the better combinations of strength and mobility on the roster. I’m not sure what the tracking data says, but it appeared to me that Filipowski was the Jazz’s best matchup against Giannis, where his size and speed clearly didn’t rival Miami’s star but was enough to at least act as a roadblock on his path to 30 points and 11 rebounds.
Josh Green: C+
The shooting was rough (I recall both an airball and a backboard hit from his corner three attempts) and you still don’t ever want him to dribble the ball, but Green consistently brings positive value in just about every other area of the game. His passing was solid (the bounce pass to the cutting Ace Bailey before his reverse jam in the fourth quarter was a highlight) and the rebounding always seemed to come in a timely manner, putting a stop to seemingly never-ending Miami offensive possessions. On top of all this, you can always count on the defense. However, there’s only so much value you’re actually bringing when you shoot an ugly 1-5 on a team that needed an offensive spark, and that puts a ceiling on Green’s grade.
Jaxson Hayes: D
By my eyes, Hayes was clearly the worst of the three Jazz big men who got any run against the Heat. He was physically overmatched going against Giannis and Bam, which created a snowball effect of fouls to frustration to more fouls. Hayes is the big man who I believe is most benefitted by playing with capable offensive players – he doesn’t have the strength or ball skills to make anything happen on his own, but his athleticism becomes exponentially more valuable when he has stars to take some of the gravity off of him. Tonight, with 3 key scorers out of commission, you could tell that Hayes was floundering in his search for what he was supposed to provide. On the plus side – I’ve been relatively impressed with his top-of-the-key playmaking recently: he had a few nice passes to Darryn throughout.
Svi Mykhailiuk: D
One of the benefits that Svi had last year over his shooting guard peers was that he was one of the few who seemed to try at all defensively. He was never good, mind you, but he was big enough and had enough experience around the NBA to barely surpass some of the guys he was competing against for minutes. This year, however, that is no longer the case. Josh Green and Josh Okogie have made a living off of the defensive end, and Darryn Peterson is also a natural two with higher highs on defense than Svi could ever reach. So, when Svi isn’t making his shots, he no longer has the safety net of yesteryear that says “well, he’s better than the alternative”. I understand that shooters have a short memory, but maybe Svi’s could be broadened just a bit, because some of these attempts are really only permissible in the context of a heat check. For Svi’s sake, something has got to change, because I currently see him on the fast track to being an international league star, as opposed to someone with a legitimate future in the NBA.
Josh Okogie: C-
Much of what I wrote for Josh Green could be copy-and-pasted over to fellow Josh, Okogie…except this time the shooting was slightly worse and his decision-making was a bit less snappy. I liked Okogie’s defensive effort a bit more in this game than Green’s (his tie-up on Antetokounmpo in transition should’ve been a jump ball), but it wasn’t enough to either (a) prevent Giannis, one of his main matchups, from getting to his spots or (b) prevent his +/- from being by far the worst on the team, with a -22. We all know, at this point, what we’re getting from Okogie, and his game-to-game value is mostly determined by the dice roll that is his shooting variance. Today, with poor shooting and no star combo guard for him to pester defensively, Okogie was not particularly valuable.
Darryn Peterson: A-
In terms of how much excitement Peterson drummed up within me, this grade would be an easy A+. His poise in the pick-and-roll was immaculate, his touch was impressive from all over the court, and his passing looks slightly ahead of the schedule implied by the Kansas tape. For large swaths of his game, he was the offense: he brought the ball up the court, and the remainder of the shot clock was spent trying to free him up with screens and handoffs. Most impressively to me, he functioned with comfort against the hounding, disruptive nature of Davion Mitchell – on paper, this was an easy matchup to predict giving Peterson loads of trouble, but he still always felt like he had control over his offensive attack, even in spite of the 5 turnovers. However, purely in terms of his output on the court tonight, he was still a few steps away from perfect. He fouled out in the 4th quarter on a pretty ticky-tack call, but a good percentage of his penalties were legitimate and foolishly committed. Additionally, his defense is still very much the defense of a rookie guard; he has the tools to make big plays, but often falls asleep or misses key rotations. I give him plenty of grace due to the context of this being his first game as the true #1 offensive option on an NBA team, but his missteps tonight prevent him from getting the grade that matches our excitement.
Brice Sensabaugh: C
You know what, I haven’t given up on Brice Sensabaugh. The prevailing opinion seems to be that he cannot positively impact winning, but I just can’t agree with that quite yet. Tonight, his scoring isn’t what you would have hoped. Only 5 shots for a team clearly in need of a scoring punch was odd and out of character, and does hurt his grade. However, I think he did provide marginal value in a few other areas. For example, there were a few plays where I was quite impressed with his defense against Miami’s wings – he met them near the half court line and used his mass to make life a little difficult. In general, he filled the stat sheet, outside of the points column: 4 rebounds, 4 assists, and a steal in 14 minutes isn’t too shabby for the microwave scorer archetype. Of course, I can’t give too high of a grade – he isn’t quite good enough at anything besides scoring for a non-scoring night to be immensely valuable – but I do think that we need to give Brice a bit more grace and a bit more priority minutes-wise as the season progresses.
Who stood out for you? Which grades would you change? Sound off below!
