It’s worth asking: would the Romans have chosen the Ides of March to kill Julius Caesar if they knew about Selection Sunday?
Probably not, especially if the CAA was a potential two-bid league. Picture that: the senators gathered around a television, hoping against hope that the loser of the conference championship game squeaked into the Dance as a pesky 10-seed.
This year, Selection Sunday falls on the Ides of March. The CAA won’t be a two-bid league (sadly), but that’ll only make the conference tournament
that much more exciting. Whoever comes out of Washington, D.C., with the conference crown will have a spot waiting for them in America’s most premier sporting event (don’t try to argue with me on that point), while the loser goes home (or perhaps to the NIT, the CBI, or the Crown).
Five days in the nation’s capital. Twelve games. Twelve heartbreaks. One massive celebration. Need I say more?
Below you’ll find a preview of all 13 CAA teams, complete with an X-factor for each. They’re split into tiers, with tier six being the underdogs and tier one being the favorites. They’re organized within tiers in the same way; each team has a better chance at winning it all, in my opinion, than the one before it.
At the end? A finished bracket, complete with my own predictions. They won’t be right — they never are — but in the spirit of March, why not fill out a bracket when given the chance?
Without further ado:
Tier 6: Keep those buses warm
Northeastern Huskies (#13)
Does anyone remember that U2 album that Apple put on your phone and wouldn’t let you delete in the mid-2010s? Northeastern’s presence at the CAA Tournament feels a little bit like that. The Huskies aren’t doing anybody any harm, and they can be pleasant to have around if you really need basketball to watch, but their chances of doing anything here are extremely limited.
Why they won’t cut down the nets in DC: Well… two wins across 18 games doesn’t bode well for winning five in five days. Northeastern’s injuries crippled them from the jump, losing star guard LA Pratt for the season in November and freshman starters Xander Alarie and Miles Newton suffered season-ending upper-body and Achilles injuries, respectively. That’d be a death knell for most teams, and the Huskies are no exception, riding a 12-game losing streak into the nation’s capital.
Why they could cut down the nets in DC: The day of reckoning comes early. Northeastern did have the second best effective field goal percentage in the CAA, so if they can almost double that, they might have a shot…
X-Factor: Guard Ryan Williams. Williams is one of three players in the country to shoot 50/40/90 for the season, and has been great in (weirdly) semi-limited opportunities. His play in recent games gives head coach Bill Coen no choice but to give him a run in the win-and-in matchup against NC A&T, so maybe he puts on a show.
Tier 5: Keep those buses (luke)warm
NC A&T Aggies (#12)
What if we took Northeastern and made them slightly better defensively?
Of course, there’s more to these Aggies than that. But, if we look purely at the numbers, that’s about all that separates these two squads. Offensively, they’re nearly identical (efficiency-wise, at least), but on defense, the Aggies beat out the Huskies by just about five efficiency points. That defense is buoyed by two big rim protectors in Will Felton and KJ Debrick, who do just enough to make the Aggies’ defense passable.
Why they won’t cut down the nets in DC: Defense, where the Aggies rank just ahead of Northeastern. Opponents just slaughter them on that end, scoring efficiently from every spot on the floor and taking advantage of a young, discombobulated group. Winning five games in a row with a defense that poor is borderline impossible.
Why they could cut the nets down in DC: Treat this section more as my appreciation for what the Aggies have actually been able to put together rather than an endorsement of them winning it all (or even one game).
Offensively, NC A&T boast an efficient duo of scorers in Lewis Walker and Trent Middleton Jr., both of whom are adept at scoring at all three levels. Walker is the standout, notching nearly 20 points a night as a freshman. He’s ticked that up in CAA wins, pushing that number to almost 25. Walker’s had double-digits in all but two games this year, and his size (6-foot-6) and ability make him a nightmare cover for most defenses. In a number of ways, though, it’s impressive that the Aggies have even had this level of success. After a scandal rocked the roster last year, they lost virtually the entire team, and they’ve been more competitive than expected in what was, for all intents and purposes, a stabilizing, rebuilding year.
X-Factor: Guard Lewis Walker. It’s hard to choose anybody else when the freshman has been such a major driving force behind A&T’s offense, and he has the potential to use the Aggies’ tournament run as a springboard for deserved attention and glamour.
“[Walker] is fun to coach because he works so hard… he’s probably the hardest working young man that I’ve ever coached, and that’s saying something,” head coach Monte Ross told Mid-Major Madness. “He’s earned everything he’s gotten from us as a coaching staff… I’m just happy for him that he’s getting an opportunity to see all his hard work pay off [and] to put that hard work on display.”
Hampton Pirates (#10)
Strange but true: Hampton has won just three games away from their home gym this season.
Those three? An early-season victory at Brown, a win at Maryland-Eastern Shore, and a neutral-site win over Jackson State. All three of those teams rank in KenPom’s bottom quartile, with UMES and Jackson State slotting into the bottom 10%.That doesn’t shape up well for a neutral-site tournament.
Why they won’t cut down the nets in DC: Hampton’s offense is at or near the bottom of the CAA in nearly every category. They only field two players — Michael Eley and Jalyke Gaines-Wyatt — above 10 points per game, and have just one qualifying player (10th man Aidan Haskins) shooting above 33.5% from deep.
“But they looked like this last year!” you exclaim as the bouncer (CAA commissioner Joe D’Antonio, in this case) throws you out of the club. You’d be right! A season ago, the Pirates looked dead in the water offensively before a number of players broke out at the same time, resulting in a late-season five-game win streak and a feisty CAA Tournament appearance that saw them take down Northeastern and put a scare into UNCW. The difference? That team had Noah Farrakhan, George Beale and other elite isolation players that could go win games by themselves. This iteration just doesn’t seem to have that same juice.
Why they could cut down the nets in DC: Defense travels, and the Pirates have some of that. Gaines-Wyatt and Eley could suddenly snap into efficient form, and we saw flashes from guard Etienne Strothers a season ago before what’s been a relatively anonymous sophomore season. If those three can bring back memories of the isolation wizards from last year, the Pirates can hang around in games and try to steal them away in crunch time.
X-Factor: Etienne Strothers, for the reasons listed. Hampton needs scoring in the worst way, and Strothers at his best is a shifty, change-of-direction guard who can get downhill in a hurry. That’d provide a spark to a dormant Pirates offense.
Tier 4: Goin’ to Carolina In My Mind… or before the quarterfinals
Elon Phoenix (#11)
Elon actually has a pretty intriguing roster, which is more than you can say for most 11 seeds in recent CAA memory. Senior guard/forward Chandler Cuthrell leads the way, averaging 20 and seven rebounds, but the Phoenix have three more players in double digits. Unfortunately, their defense is horrific, allowing for losses to both of the CAA’s bottom feeders in NC A&T and Northeastern.
Why they won’t cut the nets down in DC: Defense wins championships, after all. Elon does not have that, partially due to opponents shooting the lights out and partially due to a frontcourt that lets up offensive rebounds at a league-worst rate. It’s not a coincidence that they gave up 102 and 85 points in those losses to A&T and Northeastern. And, after a 5-4 start to conference play, the Phoenix went just 1-8 in the back nine. Phoenix (Phoenixes?) are known for rising from the ashes, but Elon has a snowball’s chance in hell.
Why they could cut the nets down in DC: Elon’s offensive prowess is legit, and Cuthrell is good enough to lead them into battle. Senior Kacper Klaczek, at 6-foot-8, is one of the most underrated offensive players in the league — he shoots 45% from three and rebounds at a professional level — and junior guard Randall Pettus is a willing and able third option. The only plausible path? Curthrell, Klaczek and Pettus hit another level, and the Phoenix get some heavy shooting variance to swing in their favor.
X-Factor: Forward Kacper Klaczek. Few players impact the game in as many ways as Klaczek, who can stretch the floor, snag rebounds, and defend. His energy is infectious, and Elon always seems to play two steps quicker when he’s on the floor. He’s dealt with some recent injuries, so his status is in question, but he’s uber-impactful when he’s out there.
Campbell Fightin’ Camels (#9)
Campbell outdid expectations this season behind first-year head coach John Andrzejek and transfer guards DJ Smith and Jeremiah Johnson. Both Smith and Johnson are over 15 a game, with the former in contention for CAA Player of the Year and the latter checking in as one of the conference’s most efficient volume scorers.
Why they won’t cut down the nets in DC: Like Elon, they’re not good enough on the defensive end to win four games in four days. However, instead of struggling to guard the arc, the Camels’ defense is more or less a procession to the rim for opponents, who score there at will. Campbell’s only rotational player above 6-foot-8 is sophomore Davydas Butka, who rebounds fairly well but defends the rim at a nonexistent level. Finally, the Camels don’t have much depth, getting over 80% of their minutes from their starting five, making the grind of a four-day gauntlet that much tougher.
Why they could cut down the nets in DC: Guard play will forever and always reign supreme in college basketball, particularly at the mid-major level. Between Smith, Johnson, and senior defensive specialist Cam Gregory, the Camels have that in spades. They’ve quietly come on in recent weeks, too, winning five of nine since Jan. 31 with each loss coming by five or fewer points. For those of you interested? Campbell hasn’t given up more than 72 points to any team outside of William & Mary since January. This could be the team to make a run.
X-Factor: DJ Smith. Campbell needs their lead man to be efficient, full-stop. He’s slowed down a bit as the season’s worn on, which is a trend that needs reversing for Campbell to go deep.
“[Smith] is a high-level shooter with the quickness to get in the lane and make plays,” Andrzejek told Mid-Major Madness. “When he’s at his best, he raises our ceiling significantly. We’ll need him to return to form to make a sustained run in D.C.”
Tier 3: Rock Fights and Track Meets
Drexel Dragons (#5)
Want to feel like it’s 1995 again? I have zero logical explanation for how Drexel got to 10 wins. It defies all logic. They’re beyond poor offensively. They turn the ball over at a ridiculous clip, and they don’t really rebound. However, the Dragons excel on defense, where they’ve been tops in the CAA in efficiency and field goal percentage against. Drexel doesn’t let you breathe, forcing long, painstaking possessions that bog opposing offenses down (and put the crowd to sleep).
Why they won’t cut down the nets in DC: Drexel’s been above 80 points twice in CAA play, against the two worst defensive teams (Elon and Northeastern). Outside of that, scoring has come at a major premium. The Dragons lead the CAA in turnovers per game, and they don’t have enough shotmaking to compensate. It’s a surprise Drexel is here at all, given who they lost in the transfer portal this offseason. Head coach Zach Spiker deserves some real credit for getting them to this point. There just isn’t enough offensive talent here.
Why they could cut down the nets in DC: Drexel suffocates other teams defensively, and the Dragons have a balanced (if muted) offensive attack that allows different players to shine at any given time. Shane Blakeney leads the way at guard, Kevon Vanderhorst runs the point, Victor Panov is a versatile, skilled forward, and Eli Beard provides the only consistent threat from outside. The key is obviously defense, but any of those four have the potential to go and win Drexel games in the tournament.
ˆX-Factor: Guard Shane Blakeney. Blakeney will need to go head-to-head with the best guards in the conference and come out on top; with Drexel’s offensive ineptitude, that’s the only real path to success.
Stony Brook Seawolves (#8)
The metrics aren’t buying the Seawolves, who aren’t particularly efficient on either end. However, Stony Brook didn’t get to nine wins by accident, and a five-game winning streak in January that began with victories over Hofstra and Charleston legitimized them to some degree. They haven’t been great outside of that run, but with CAA Player of the Year candidate Erik Pratt at the helm, it’s hard to really discount the Seawolves.
Why they won’t cut down the nets in DC: Nothing about them stands out as champions. Losing sophomore star Collin O’Connor early in the season was a setback, and even though Pratt has more than filled the star role, Stony Brook’s weapons just don’t stack up against the class of the CAA. Richard Goods and Rob Brown have both been steady behind Pratt, but neither is all that efficient. Defensively, opponents are able to exploit the Seawolves for open threes far too often, and even though they do a pretty good job of turning opponents away at the rim, their penance for allowing open shots makes them a middling defensive squad. In conference play, they’ve relied on chucking threes (49% of their attempts have been from beyond the arc) and if those stop falling, a turnover-prone offense might find itself stuck in neutral.
Why they will cut down the nets in DC: Erik Pratt catches fire and Andrej Shoshkikj extrapolates his ridiculous efficiency to a larger sample size. Pratt is just a 31% 3-point shooter, but that comes on some admittedly tough shots. He and Shoshkikj will need to be the two best offensive players in the nation’s capital, and they’ll have to commit to guarding the three-point line on the other end.
X-Factor: Freshman Andrej Shoshkikj. There are three players in the country who have 50/40/90 splits (going into the season’s final day): one is the aforementioned Ryan Williams, with Shoshkikj being another. He’s been nothing short of a revelation for the Seawolves, knocking down an eye-popping 44% from distance. If you think that isn’t sustainable, his 96% free throw rate says otherwise, and as his minutes have ticked up, so has his impact.
“[Shoshkikj] has had a special season,” Stony Brook head coach Geno Ford told Mid-Major Madness. “He’s been super efficient scoring the ball and he’s really improved his defensive effort… he’s had a Rookie of the Year type of season.”
Towson Tigers (#7)
Want to feel like it’s 2002 again? Tune into a Towson game, which features slow, inefficient offense and physical, unrelenting defense. This year hasn’t been what Pat Skerry would’ve wanted for his bunch, though: the Tigers were preseason favorites, and returned the CAA Player of the Year in Tyler Tejada and All-CAA Second Teamer Dylan Williamson, just to slog through an unconvincing conference slate to finish .500 and outside the top four with weird losses to NC A&T and Hampton raising major red flags.
Why they won’t cut down the nets in DC: Towson’s offense is capital-T terrible. In an age where shooting is more important than ever, the Tigers are converting on 28% of their 3-point attempts, dead-last in the CAA and second-to-last in the nation, only ahead of the 4-25 Rider Broncs. After getting so much preseason buzz, Tejada and Williamson have both regressed, and an iso-heavy offense that was reliant on those two being dominant hasn’t found ways to cope. Transfer guard Tyler Schmidt has been a total bust, and even as transfer forward Jack Doumbia has found a way to impact games, his grind-it-out, paint work skillset doesn’t flow super well with the two stars. To cap it off, the Tigers are just 1-5 against the CAA’s top-four, with the lone win coming in a home contest against a flagging, injured Charleston.
Why they will cut down the nets in DC: It’d be a hilarious reversal of fortune if Skerry finally gets over the tournament hump with this iteration of his Tigers. Even if it’s somewhat of a longshot, you can’t discount the top-end talent. Tejada spent most of his sophomore season looking like a future pro, and Williamson is borderline unguardable when his step-back threes are finding nylon. Towson’s defense is good enough to keep them in most games, and a sizable fan contingent should be present with campus a tick under an hour’s drive from DC.
X-Factor: Freshman Jaquan Womack. Womack’s counting stats aren’t particularly impressive, but the 6-foot-6 forward has real game-changing ability on both ends with his energy and athleticism. If he can make enough shots to stay on the court, he’s a true defensive weapon.
“Jaquan has been making good progress,” Skerry told Mid-Major Madness. “His energy and competitiveness have been impressive and helpful for us… his skill improvement has been consistent throughout.”
William & Mary Tribe (#6)
Want to feel like it’s 2026 again? Welcome back to the future, brought to you via Brian Earl’s run-and-gun, full-court-pressure, hockey-substitutions style. William & Mary run the fastest offense in the country — no exaggeration — and play a 10-man rotation that seemingly never lets up. Earl’s style can lead to some weird results — a season sweep at the hands of Elon and Campbell, for example — but can also swing the other way, like a season sweep over UNCW.
Why they won’t cut down the nets in DC: This version of William & Mary is a little less volatile than last year’s (they shoot far fewer threes, somehow), but they still haven’t been the picture of consistency in league play. Simply put, it’s hard for any team to win four games in four days, let alone one that expends that much energy on both sides of the ball and relies so heavily on transition offense to be successful.
Why they will cut down the nets in DC: Who the hell wants to play these guys? For any normal team — i.e. a team that doesn’t treat every game like a 100m hurdles event — playing the Tribe is a nightmare. They’re either in your face or running full speed away from you for the entire 40 minutes, and they have about 300 6-foot-6 guys on their roster who just keep cycling in and out like the boss level of some ridiculous video game. Blink, and Earl is smiling as your team just gave up their second 13-0 run of the first half, and if they really get hot from three? Game over. In the halfcourt, skilled scorers Reese Miller and Chase Lowe have enough to carry the Tribe through some tough stretches, and there isn’t a single player on this team you can pick on defensively.
X-Factor: Senior Kyle Pulliam. William & Mary is the epitome of there not being an I in TEAM, but Pulliam’s experience and late-game savvy could easily be the difference in a tight game late.
“[Pulliam] is a high-character player and was our first recruit at William & Mary,” Earl told Mid-Major Madness. “He understands how we want to play… his versatility is an asset as he [can] handle the ball, understands how to cut, can shoot it from the perimeter, and has length on the defensive end.”
Monmouth Hawks (#4)
It’s hard to really gauge the Hawks, who were good-not-great until transfer point guard Kavion McClain was cleared to play just eight games ago. Since then, Monmouth is 6-2, and their offense has hit another level behind the 5-foot-10 offensive dynamo. The goal now is to be purely additive alongside junior forward Jason Rivera-Torres, who’d been leading the offense before McClain came back. How they’ll continue meshing together will define their ceiling.
Why they won’t cut the nets down in DC: Monmouth against the three teams above them? 0-4, and only one of those losses was particularly close. Rivera-Torres, for as important as he’s been, is shooting below 40% from the floor, and the Hawks don’t really have a reliable big man outside 6-foot-9 freshman Stefanos Spartalis. They’ve rebounded and defended at a respectable threshold, but when the intensity hits another level, a short frontcourt and inefficient lead scorer makes Monmouth more of a long shot then they otherwise might be.
Why they could cut the nets down in DC: McClain. He’s been unguardable since his debut, averaging nearly 18 points and six assists on remarkable efficiency. Outside of his burgeoning stardom, the Hawks have the aforementioned Rivera-Torres, as well as sophomore guard Justin Ray and a handful of really solid peripheral players. Ray is the most important of the lot. He shoots 40% from three and can take and make from pretty much anywhere across halfcourt. He singlehandedly won Monmouth the game a few times this year, including a game-winning three against Towson and a 27-point, seven-three explosion against Northeastern. Ray as a third option behind McClain and Rivera-Torres make the Hawks capable of offensive power, and their defense is solid enough to complement that.
X-Factor: Guard Kavion McClain. See above. McClain is a unique offensive engine who both scores and distributes at the highest level. He’s still learning how to play with these guys, too, which is remarkable. Shifty guards rule in March.
Tier 2: Big Cats
Charleston Cougars (#2)
While Charleston’s season-ending victory over UNCW didn’t earn them the one-seed, it went a long way towards legitimizing the Cougars’ late-season run. Chris Mack’s squad struggled mightily in the non-conference amidst a slew of injuries, but once they got healthier, Charleston ripped off three different win streaks of five or longer en route to winning 17 of their last 21 games.
Why the Cougars won’t cut down the nets in DC: They’re good, but are they good enough to beat Hofstra in the semis and UNCW in the finals? Both the Pride (Silas Sunday) and UNCW (Pat Wessler) have giants of their own to neutralize the Cougars’ size, and J’Lynn Counter probably wouldn’t have an advantage in the guard matchup against either team. Of course, they can still come out on top — Charleston split their head-to-head matchups with both squads this year — having to (likely) play both of those teams on back-to-back days is a tough draw. In a year where the top of the CAA has three elite teams, the one-game regular season difference between earning the top seed and being second could prove all-important.
Why they could cut down the nets in DC: DEPTH. I really like the Cougars, and their best, Charleston has a bona fide nine-man rotation that goes toe-to-toe with any mid-major across the country. Counter has had an incredible season in his grad year after coming from Middle Tennessee, they have two superb seven-footers in Christian Reeves and Chol Machot, and between rookie shooter Martin Kalu, wizened shooter Connor Hickman, and junior forward Colby Duggan, Mack’s offense has too many mouths to feed in the best way possible.
X-Factor: Forward Christian Reeves. At 7-foot-2, Reeves has the size advantage every time he steps between the lines, and he’s upped his scoring output during the Cougars’ recent hot stretch. Paint dominance will go a long way towards tipping the scales in DC.
Tier 1B: Cruzin for a bruisin’
Hofstra Pride (#3)
Outside of a five-game, bad-luck losing streak where the Pride didn’t drop a single contest by double-digits, Hofstra has been the best team in the conference both in conference and non-conference play. Their non-conference slate includes wins over ACC giants Syracuse and Pitt, as well as wins over MAAC powers Merrimack and Quinnipiac and a tight, Quad-1 loss at UCF. Junior guard Cruz Davis is in the running, if not the favorite, for CAA Player of the Year, and freshman guard Preston Edmead has bloomed into a star.
Why they won’t cut down the nets in DC: Hofstra’s reliance on their guards makes their offense somewhat shooting-dependent. They don’t generate a lot of looks at the rim, and there isn’t one player in the supporting cast that’s been a consistent third star. Hofstra has seen 40% its points in conference play have come from beyond the arc. Any team that can play 1-on-1 with Davis and Edmead consistently will press the Pride into an uncomfortable offensive night.
Why they will cut the nets down in DC: This team pairs truly elite guard scoring with a very good defense, a recipe that’s led to success in March time and time again. Hofstra’s supporting cast isn’t star-studded, but the trio of shooting wing German Plotnikov, Swiss Army knife forward Joshua DeCady, and powerful seven-footer Silas Sunday make enough plays on the margins to complement the guards consistently.
One of the most notable stats from the Pride’s dream of a season? Hofstra hasn’t lost a single game all season by more than eight points. They guard man-to-man, using their athletic roster to keep from doubling or switching more than they have to. It’s led to a top-three defense in the conference, mostly due to a league-best two-point percentage against. Hofstra grinds opponents down, forcing them into long, ugly shots on one end before their shifty stable of guards takes over on the other end. That’s a tough formula for any opposing head coach to crack.
X-Factor: Guard Preston Edmead. Davis will do what Davis does, but the freshman Edmead can’t suffer a lapse in play. Hofstra’s two-pronged attack is their style and their identity. Both prongs need to be fit and firing.
Tier 1A: Soaring Seahawks
UNC Wilmington Seahawks (#1)
UNCW travels to DC as the favorite to represent the CAA in the Big Dance for the second season running. The Seahawks posted yet another 20-win season under head man Takayo Siddle, using suffocating defense along with elite clutch play to continuously pull out wins in games that other teams might’ve simply given up on.
Why they won’t cut down the nets in DC: UNCW’s offense can run into some dry spells. They’ve found themselves in more close games than they would’ve liked this year, mostly due to an attack that wasn’t always flowing. They don’t shoot the three particularly often. They don’t shoot free throws particularly well, and the offense has lacked spacing as a result. Teams that can guard the seven-foot Patrick Wessler can take away UNCW’s main weapon, and while Nolan Hodge is a great second option to have, he doesn’t have the same dynamic ability as Hofstra’s Davis or Monmouth’s McClain.
Why they could cut down the nets in DC: This is the best team in the conference, full stop. With the return of junior forward Gavin Walsh from injury, the Seahawks have the most talented — and the most experienced — rotation in the CAA, and their late-game execution is a nightmare for any opponent to keep up with. All year, the Seahawks dominated opponents in the clutch, and there’s no reason why Siddle’s bunch shouldn’t keep that trend going into knockout play.
It’s not like this team sleepwalks offensively, either. Point guard Greedy Williams has taken a massive stride in his senior season, upping both his efficiency and his distributing chops; Hodge is a talented three-level scorer, and fellow wings Madison Durr and Christian May can both get hot in a hurry. Off the bench, the Seahawks boast an impressive scorer in Jahnathan Lamothe, and big seven-footer Makoi Mabor Makoi can spell the talented Wessler. As a team, the Seahawks are able to get to the free throw line at will. Their championship hopes will hinge on whether they can make enough of them when necessary.
X-Factor: Pat Wessler. As stated earlier, paint dominance is essential, and Wessler will likely have to battle Sunday and Reeves at some point. He’s been great overall, but the poor performances have bitten him from time to time, and he can be streaky. UNCW needs three consecutive days of Wessler at his best to get back to the Dance.
Bracket and Predictions
First Round
(13) Northeastern over (12) NC A&T
Second Round
(9) Campbell over (8) Stony Brook
(5) Drexel over (13) Northeastern
(7) Towson over (10) Hampton
(6) William & Mary over (11) Elon
Quarterfinals
(1) UNCW over (9) Campbel
(4) Monmouth over (5) Drexel
(2) Charleston over (7) Towson
(3) Hofstra over (6) William & Mary
Semifinals
(1) UNCW over (4) Monmouth
(3) Hofstra over (2) Charleston
Championship
(3) Hofstra over (1) UNCW
Tournament MVP: Cruz Davis (HOF)
Let’s have some fun.
