India’s squad selection has once again come under scrutiny after a former Indian cricketer openly questioned the decision to include Nitish Kumar Reddy while overlooking in-form batter Ruturaj Gaikwad.
The comments have reignited the long-standing debate around consistency, performance-based selection, and clarity in the team management’s approach.
Ruturaj Gaikwad, who has been among the most consistent Indian batters across formats in recent years, was notably absent from the squad despite impressive domestic and franchise-level performances. The former batter expressed surprise at the call, stating that Gaikwad’s numbers and temperament warranted stronger consideration, especially given India’s ongoing search for stability in the batting order.
Consistency vs Potential
The criticism largely revolved around the perception that selections are increasingly being driven by potential rather than proven output. While Nitish Kumar Reddy is seen as a promising all-round option with raw talent, questions were raised about whether the timing of his inclusion was justified when compared to Gaikwad’s sustained run-scoring ability.
Gaikwad has repeatedly delivered in high-pressure situations, both in domestic cricket and the IPL, earning praise for his technique, composure, and adaptability. His absence has led many former players and fans to question whether performance benchmarks are being applied uniformly.
Selection Clarity Under the Scanner
The former batter also highlighted the need for greater transparency in India’s selection policy. With multiple players performing well across formats, the lack of clear communication around selection criteria often leads to confusion and debate. According to him, players who consistently score runs should feel assured that performances will translate into opportunities at the international level.
This is not the first time Gaikwad’s omission has sparked discussion, and it further underlines the depth of competition in Indian cricket. However, repeated exclusions despite strong numbers risk sending mixed signals to performers in the domestic circuit.
Team Management’s Perspective
From the team management’s standpoint, selections are often influenced by balance, future planning, and role-specific requirements. Nitish Kumar Reddy’s inclusion could be seen as part of a longer-term strategy aimed at building a pool of multi-dimensional players. Still, critics argue that such planning should not come at the cost of ignoring consistent performers.
Debate Likely to Continue
As India continues to rotate players and experiment with combinations, selection debates are unlikely to die down anytime soon. For Ruturaj Gaikwad, the focus will remain on continuing his strong form and forcing the selectors’ hand once again.
Until clearer selection logic is communicated, decisions like these will continue to divide opinion and keep former cricketers and fans engaged in heated discussions.
/images/ppid_59c68470-image-176787503651619430.webp)
/images/ppid_59c68470-image-176787502917019095.webp)
