The uncertainty surrounding the high-profile India vs Pakistan match at the ICC Men’s T20 World Cup 2026 continues, with Pakistan now floating a new proposal to break the deadlock. According to developments, the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has suggested the possibility of a tri-series involving India, Pakistan and Bangladesh if the ICC insists on Pakistan playing India on February 15.
The issue escalated after Pakistan expressed reservations over facing India, citing political sensitivities and its stance of supporting Bangladesh. Bangladesh had earlier raised concerns over touring India due to security reasons, and Pakistan backed that position, leading to a broader standoff involving all three cricket boards. What was initially expected to be
a routine marquee clash has now turned into one of the biggest talking points of the tournament. If you're a sport fanatic and want to play on India vs Pakistan match, then we highly recommened you to play on Stake and use Stake promo code TIGSTA to get 200% Welcome Bonus.
Rather than opting for a straight boycott or risking sanctions, Pakistan is believed to be exploring alternative solutions. The proposed tri-series is being seen as a middle-ground option, allowing competitive cricket to continue while addressing diplomatic concerns. The idea would ensure that Pakistan still plays matches involving India but within a different structure that also includes Bangladesh. Also Read | Jasprit Bumrah to miss the opening match of T20 World Cup vs USA due to viral fever
Discussions between the ICC, PCB and Bangladesh Cricket Board have reportedly intensified, with Pakistan awaiting a final decision from its government before confirming its participation in the February 15 fixture. PCB chairman Mohsin Naqvi is said to be in constant communication with both cricketing authorities and political leadership to arrive at a solution that avoids embarrassment on the global stage.
From the ICC’s perspective, the India-Pakistan game is not just another fixture. It is one of the most commercially valuable matches in world cricket, attracting massive viewership, sponsorships and broadcast revenue. Any disruption to the schedule could have significant financial and logistical implications, which is why the ICC is keen on sticking to the original plan.
However, the tri-series proposal adds a new dimension to the conversation. If accepted, it could ease tensions, maintain regional balance, and still keep fans engaged with high-stakes cricket. Whether India and the BCCI would agree to such an arrangement remains a crucial factor.
As the February 15 date draws closer, all eyes are on the final call. Whatever the outcome, this episode once again highlights how cricket, politics and diplomacy remain deeply intertwined in South Asian cricket.
