Liverpool Stoppage Time Controversy: Slot Questions Four Minutes Of Added Time

Liverpool’s 3-2 loss at Bournemouth ended with heated debate over stoppage time, as Arne Slot argued his side were denied a final chance to equalise. Amine Adli struck in the fifth minute of added time, despite

the fourth official initially signalling four minutes at the Vitality Stadium.

The defeat leaves the Premier League champions without a win in five league fixtures, their longest such run since 2021. It was also the third time this season that Liverpool conceded a winning goal in the 90th minute or later, the highest number in a single Premier League campaign for the club.

Slot challenged the decision to end the match immediately after Adli’s decisive strike, believing further time should have been played. Liverpool had recovered from 2-0 down through Virgil van Dijk and Dominik Szoboszlai, and Slot felt that comeback earned the side a final attacking spell before the whistle.

Slot spoke to Sky Sports after holding a long discussion with the officials on the pitch. He said: "I think first of all we have to look at ourselves. It was more open. Both teams were trying to score a goal. They had better opportunities than us in the last 10 minutes and then in the end there was a long throw-in and they scored a goal. For me, four minutes of added time was not enough but in the end that didn't matter because they scored. "

Slot accepted that Bournemouth created clearer openings late on but still pointed to the timekeeping. He argued there had been a free-kick that delayed play for several minutes, alongside stoppages for VAR checks and substitutions, and felt those interruptions should have pushed the added time beyond four minutes.

3 - Liverpool conceded a 90th-minute winning goal for the third time in the Premier League this seasontheir most ever in a single campaign in the competition. Heartache. pic.twitter.com/kMYgFpOZXyOptaJoe (@OptaJoe) January 24, 2026

Liverpool’s recent run has unfolded during an intense January schedule, which Slot highlighted when assessing the performance. The Bournemouth game was Liverpool’s seventh fixture of the month and their third in the space of seven days, including a demanding away match against Marseille.

Slot explained that the same core group has carried that workload across several competitions. He said: "Although we were 2-0 down at a certain point,it didn't feel to me that we deserved to be 2-0 down at the moment we were, but the players reacted really well. We came back to 2-2 and then I thought it was a very open game where both teams had their chances. They probably [had] even more than us, which shouldn't come as a complete surprise to me, knowing that we've played in Marseille and for the last four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, 10 games we've had to play with the same players. Sometimes a few of them could be a bit tired. I think that's what you could see at the end as well. "

The key moments at the Vitality Stadium showed how the match swung before that late twist. Bournemouth moved 2-0 ahead inside just over half an hour, before Liverpool’s recovery began, only for fatigue and defensive lapses to cost them again in stoppage time.

Slot’s comments underlined two main concerns for Liverpool in this Premier League spell: the repeated concession of late winners and the impact of a congested calendar on a largely unchanged line-up. Both themes shaped another painful finish, leaving the champions searching for form and energy as the season continues.