HOUSTON, Aug 7 (Reuters) - Oil prices reversed course and climbed on U.S. job losses reported by the federal government and worries over talks between Iranian and U.S. negotiators to end fighting that has lasted five months.
Brent crude futures were up 84 cents, or 1.02%, at $83.33 a barrel at 10:28 a.m. CDT (1528 GMT). West Texas Intermediate futures climbed 89 cents, or 1.15%, to $78.18.
Oil futures had settled more than $3 a barrel higher on Thursday as Iran reviewed a bill to ban U.S. and Israeli
vessels from the Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied natural gas normally passed before the war began at the end of February.
Oil prices fell earlier in the week as a possible solution to the conflict looked more likely, and both benchmarks are on course for a weekly loss of more than 9%.
"The market on Friday is all about the jobs report," said Phil Flynn, senior analyst with Price Futures Group.
The U.S. economy lost 23,000 jobs in July, the U.S. government reported on Friday.
"It means there's less likely to be intervention by the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates," Flynn said.
Federal Reserve rate hikes take away purchasing power from consumers because interest rates across the economy increase, sending more of the cash in consumer pocketbooks to debt issuers and not to products suppliers like fuel stations.
Analysts also said that this week's developments have signalled that hostilities between Iran and the U.S. are not yet over.
Iran is seeking fees of between 5% and 7% of the price of cargoes from ships using the strait, a senior Iranian official said. Oman, meanwhile, is discussing fees of about 3% while Washington wants no fees at all.
Four industry sources have said the proposed deal is not easily workable because of U.S. sanctions and restrictive insurance clauses on any payments.
"The structure of the Iran-Oman agreement in its current form and the power it yields to Iran is nothing that (U.S. President Donald) Trump can accept politically," said Bjarne Schieldrop at SEB Research. "Trump would face heavy political criticism at home if he did."
While this week's signals on a potential deal have driven a roller-coaster ride in market sentiment, the market remains in the dark as to what needs to happen for the agreement to be clinched, said Vandana Hari, founder of oil market analysis provider Vanda Insights.
Meanwhile, Saudi Arabia expects imminent coordinated attacks from Iraqi militias north of the Gulf state and from Yemen's Houthis from the south under the supervision of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, a senior Saudi official said.
The official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said late on Thursday that intelligence reports from Saudi Arabia, the United States and other regional countries indicated civilian and economic sites could be targeted, including energy infrastructure, ports and airports.
Yemen's Iran-aligned Houthis said they carried out missile and drone attacks on Saudi deployments in Marib and Hadramout in Yemen on Thursday.
Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and Turkey signed a joint defence agreement in Mecca on Friday, uniting Sunni Muslim U.S. allies alarmed at a regional conflagration that has rained missile fire onto Gulf oil exporters.
Trump told reporters on Thursday that he believed that the war would be over soon.
Meanwhile, drone attacks in the Black Sea took out as much as a fifth of Caspian Pipeline Consortium (CPC) oil loadings in July, four sources familiar with the data said, as the Russia-Ukraine war spilled over to hit Kazakhstan's and Western oil majors' sales.
(Reporting by Erwin Seba in Houston, Stephanie Kelly in London, Mohi Narayan in New Delhi and Helen Clark in Perth.Editing by Susan Fenton, Elaine Hardcastle)
