By Jan Wolfe
April 16 (Reuters) - A federal judge on Thursday again ruled that U.S. President Donald Trump's plan to build a White House ballroom without congressional approval was unlawful, faulting the Republican president for asserting that national security requirements demanded the project move forward.
In a 10-page order, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon modified the wording of an injunction he issued on March 31 that had ordered construction to stop, to address Trump and federal agencies' "brazen"
and "disingenuous" interpretation of his earlier decision to keep going on the project.
The National Trust for Historic Preservation, a nonprofit charged by Congress to help preserve historic buildings, sued the administration, asserting Trump exceeded his authority when he razed the historic White House East Wing last October and began construction of the planned 90,000-square-foot ballroom, which is costing more than $400 million and being funded by corporate donors.
Leon said he was clarifying the scope of his earlier ruling so that it would stop "above-ground construction of the planned ballroom" but not "below-ground construction of national security facilities."
The judge's original March 31 order said much of the work needed to stop but that crews could continue "construction necessary to ensure the safety and security of the White House."
Trump and federal agencies then asserted in court filings that the judge's national security exception applied to the entire project because of elements of the ballroom like missile-resistant columns and drone-proof roofing.
The Trump administration also argued that the ballroom and a planned military bunker underneath it are a "single, coherent whole."
Leon wrote in Thursday's order that Trump and federal agencies "now seek to turn this exception on its head and unreasonably insist that the entire ballroom project may proceed."
"I cannot possibly agree," the judge wrote.
The National Trust for Historic Preservation had asked Leon to clarify his earlier injunction. After Trump appealed, an intermediate appeals court last week had also instructed Leon to revisit its scope, citing Trump's arguments about national security.
(Reporting by Jan Wolfe; editing by David Gaffen)
