The Supreme Court’s hearing on stray dog management took an unexpected turn on Thursday, when Justice Sandeep Mehta, part of a Bench also comprising Justices Vikram Nath and N V Anjaria, remarked: “Dogs
and cats are enemies… so let there be fewer dogs; cats will eat the rats.”The comment came amid submissions that expanded the debate beyond canines, with senior advocate C U Singh referring to rodent and cat “menaces” while discussing urban animal control.In response, the Bench clarified its earlier position, stressing that it had “only and only” directed that dogs be kept out of institutional areas, and had not ordered their removal from public streets.Also Read: ‘Now Only Dog Counselling Is Left’: What Supreme Court Said on Stray Dog Menace The Bench reiterated that no blanket order against stray dogs exists and that animal management must strictly adhere to existing rules.Several senior lawyers echoed a common concern, arguing that the real issue is not the Animal Birth Control (ABC) Rules themselves but their poor and uneven implementation by states. A structured, phased approach, they said, could address public safety concerns without turning city streets into an unintended wildlife battleground.The top court is currently reviewing compliance with its November 7, 2025 order, which directed that stray dogs be removed from schools, hospitals, bus stands and railway stations, and shifted to shelters.
/images/ppid_a911dc6a-image-176786233703281097.webp)

/images/ppid_a911dc6a-image-176777643385548968.webp)





/images/ppid_a911dc6a-image-176759449649644220.webp)

/images/ppid_a911dc6a-image-176770367503681230.webp)
