SC Says Maneka Gandhi Has Committed 'Contempt of Court' With Her Remarks On Stray Dogs Order - What Did She Say?

The Supreme Court on Tuesday criticised former Union minister Maneka Gandhi's remarks on the apex court's orders in thestray dog issue, stating that she has committed contempt of court. A bench of Justices Vikram Nath, Sandeep Mehta and N V Anjaria said the former minister has made "all kinds of comments" against everyone without even thinking.Questioning senior advocate Raju Ramachandran who appeared for Gandhi, the bench said, "You said the court should be circumspect in its remark but have you asked your client what kind of remarks she has made? Have you heard her podcast? She has made all kinds of remarks against everybody without even thinking. Have you seen her body language?"The bench said it was not initiating contempt proceedings against the former Union minister because

of the court's magnanimity, PTI reported. Justice Mehta asked Ramachandran what budgetary allocation has Maneka Gandhi, as a former Union minister, helped in getting to eradicate the stray dog problem. Ramachandran replied that he has appeared even on behalf of terrorist Ajmal Kasab and budgetary allocation is a policy matter. "Ajmal Kasab did not commit contempt of court but your client has," Justice Nath remarked.The bench said its remark on making dog feeders accountable was not made sarcastically but on a serious note, although during a dialogue while hearing the matter.Also Read: 300 Stray Dogs 'Killed' With Lethal Injections in Telangana

What did Maneka Gandhi say?

On January 4, Maneka Gandhi said that Supreme Court judges have done a "disservice" and that the top court's order to remove stray dogs from public spaces has "divided" the country.Speaking to reporters, Maneka said, "Supreme Court has created an atmosphere of hate across India… What the judges have done is wrong by simply dividing India into people that hate one or one love species, through this they have done to disservice to India. The Animal Welfare Act is a very good act. They haven’t removed the act. They have simply said that you can act against the act. This is not correct."On January 13, the top court had said it will ask states to pay a "heavy compensation" for dog bite incidents and hold dog feeders accountable for such cases. The court also flagged concerns over the non-implementation of norms on stray animals for the last five years.The hearing in the case is still underway. (With agency inputs)