Property Linked To Ram Mandir Theft Accused Comes Under Ayodhya Authority Scanner

Lucknow: The Ayodhya Development Authority (ADA) has issued a notice over an under-construction property linked to Luv Kush Mishra, an accused in the Ram Mandir donation theft case. The property is registered in the name of his wife, Supriya Mishra. According to the sources, the notice has been served to Supriya Mishra, the owner has been directed to submit a reply within one week. The authority has sought clarification on whether the building plan has been duly approved. If the construction has a sanctioned map, the owner has been asked to furnish the relevant documents within the stipulated period. During an inspection, ADA officials reportedly found that the construction was not being carried out in accordance with prescribed building norms.

Following the inspection, the notice was served on Supriya Mishra, in whose name the property is registered.Officials have warned that if no satisfactory reply is submitted within the deadline, further legal action may be initiated. This could include demolition proceedings if the construction is found to be unauthorised or in violation of building regulations.According to sources, Luv Kush Mishra purchased the land during his tenure at the Ram Mandir office. Official documents indicate that the land, located in the Mangsi Pargana area of Sohawal tehsil, was purchased on October 16, 2025, from Kamal Swaroop Singh for ₹8.8 lakh. The property is registered in the name of his wife, Supriya Mishra. Sources further claim that the current estimated market value of the property is around ₹25 lakh.The matter relating to the construction notice is currently under the jurisdiction of the Ayodhya Development Authority, and any further action will depend on the owner's response and the authority's findings.Importantly the two-storey under-construction residence of Luv Kush Mishra came under the scanner of investigating agencies and Ayodhya police after he was arrested in the embezzlement case, as per the sources, the accused only earns Rs 15,000 and was constructing a lavish residence, which indicates the siphoned off money must have been used in the construction.