A bench of Justices J K Maheshwari and Vijay Bishnoi refused to intervene and said "parallel indulgence" was improper.
The top court said the petitioner could move the high court for the order’s modification.
The top court was hearing an appeal filed by animal enthusiasts and others challenging an order of the Bombay High Court.
The high court observed the issue was over public health and the grave and potential health hazard to people of all ages at large.
The court had previously restrained the BMC
The court had then underlined the safety and predominance of human health from the menace created by the congregation of pigeons to be the biggest concern.
The plea was filed by Pallavi Patil, Sneha Visaria and Savita Mahajan, who claimed the BMC started demolishing the feeding spots from July 3 onwards without legal backing.
They argued the BMC’s act violated the Prevention of Cruelty to
Also Read: SC wants Delhi to be free of stray dogs, says round up all canines in shelters and pounds