Recent
news that Coca-Cola is trialling paper-based carriers for its multipacks in Europe, replacing traditional plastic shrink-wrap with a recyclable cardboard handle, has drawn attention for its environmental benefits. But beyond reducing plastic waste, this shift could also carry important implications for public health.
The hidden cost of plastic packaging
Everyday plastic packaging, including bottle carriers, wraps, caps and multipacks, contains a myriad of synthetic additives. Many of these are known or suspected to be endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), including substances like bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, flame retardants, and other plasticizers. Scientific studies show that these chemicals can leach into beverages or food, especially under conditions of heat, prolonged storage or mechanical stress. Once inside the human body, EDCs may interfere with hormone regulation, potentially contributing to metabolic disorders, reproductive problems, developmental issues in children, and other chronic health concerns.Moreover, as plastics degrade over time, they can create microplastics and nanoplastics, tiny plastic fragments that persist in the environment, get into water, food and air, and may be ingested or inhaled. Emerging research suggests that micro-nanoplastics are not inert: they carry embedded chemicals and can also absorb additional toxic compounds from the environment, acting as vectors for chemical exposure.One review published recently concluded that micro- and nanoplastics pose serious threats to endocrine health, potentially disrupting hormonal function through impacts on glands such as the thyroid, pituitary, and reproductive organs.
Less plastic = fewer risks
By replacing plastic shrink wraps with paper-based carriers, Coca-Cola’s pilot may reduce the overall volume of plastic packaging entering households and waste streams. That, in turn, could lower the exposure of consumers to hazardous plastic-derived chemicals and reduce environmental contamination that leads to microplastic proliferation.For everyday people, especially children, pregnant women, and individuals sensitive to hormonal disruptions, such a packaging shift may help cut down on cumulative exposure to EDCs and microplastics. Over time, widespread adoption of safer packaging materials could translate into fewer hormone-related disorders, lower risks of metabolic and reproductive issues, and a healthier environment overall.
Why experts are watching
Health and environmental scientists have long cautioned about the “hidden cost” of plastic use. A comprehensive report by the Endocrine Society summarizes decades of evidence linking plastics and their chemical additives to endocrine disruption, metabolic disturbances, developmental abnormalities, infertility, and other health challenges.
Given the scale of global plastic use, and the projected growth of plastic packaging, even incremental shifts by large beverage companies could have outsized health and environmental impact over time.In short: Coca-Cola’s paper-based packaging experiment isn’t just a green PR move, it may also mark a small but meaningful step toward reducing everyday chemical and plastic exposure for millions of consumers. If adopted widely, such “packaging hygiene” innovations have the potential to benefit both planet and people.