Last year, Dr Sivaranjani Santosh became a name many parents quietly rooted for. Her 8-year-long fight against ORSL, a product which was often confused with WHO-approved ORS led to action from the Food Safety and Standards Authority of India, which prohibited brands from misusing the term 'ORS' on food products. For most of us watching from the outside, it felt like closure but for her, that moment was just a turning point, not the end.On call with us today, a day after resigning from the Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP), there was no sense of triumph in her voice only exhaustion layered with clarity. “If I have to fight my battles alone with no support from my organisation, then I will do it independently,” she said. It wasn’t said in anger
as much as in acceptance. She had already been doing the work on her own where she was reaching out to schools, authorities, raising awareness at the grassroots, even going as far as secretly recording pharmacies that continued to hand out ORSL when parents specifically asked for ORS. What she hadn’t anticipated was resistance from within.Because while the public narrative framed her as someone who had taken on the system and won, her reality was far different and complicated. There was no direct, visible backlash from companies, she told me, but there was a steady stream of threats, allegations, insinuations that she was being funded by competing brands. “That was expected. I knew this wouldn’t be easy,” she admitted. What she didn’t expect was the shift within her own professional ecosystem. Her claims, which she insists were evidence-based, began to be questioned and even dismissed. There were communications circulating among paediatricians supporting the use of sucralose, something she had been openly cautioning against. “That caught me off guard,” she said.Things escalated in March 2026 when she received a legal notice from pharmaceutical firm accusing her of making 'false and defamatory' statements on social media. At the heart of this was the rebranding of ORSL to ERZL, a move she believes continues to create confusion among consumers. She explains, "The argument from the companies is that sugar levels have been reduced and replaced with sucralose, an approved sweetener. But sucralose is not something I would recommend for children, particularly those under two. It has the potential to worsen gut inflammation, disrupt the microbiome and increase long-term health risks." More importantly, she emphasised that such drinks are not meant for regular consumption anyway, something that gets lost in marketing narratives.


/images/ppid_a911dc6a-image-177608203803571740.webp)


/images/ppid_a911dc6a-image-17762472331149738.webp)


/images/ppid_a911dc6a-image-177623042974861315.webp)

/images/ppid_a911dc6a-image-177618746941275218.webp)

