What's Happening?
Oregon head coach Dan Lanning has voiced his criticisms regarding the current format of the College Football Playoff (CFP). Speaking before the quarterfinal playoff game against Texas Tech, Lanning suggested
that the season should ideally conclude by January 1, with the championship game marking the end. He argued that this would allow for a more streamlined transition for coaches and players, particularly concerning the transfer portal and coaching changes. Lanning's comments were echoed by FOX Sports analyst Joel Klatt, who agreed that the current system, which includes playing quarterfinals at neutral sites, is flawed. Klatt highlighted that the top four seeds in the last two playoffs have a poor record, suggesting that the current structure disadvantages them. Both Lanning and Klatt believe that the playoff should be completed by January 1, with the Rose Bowl serving as the final event.
Why It's Important?
The criticisms from Lanning and Klatt highlight ongoing dissatisfaction with the CFP format, which has significant implications for college football. The current system's timing and structure are seen as problematic, potentially affecting team performance and the broader college football ecosystem. The call for changes reflects a desire to improve the competitive balance and logistical aspects of the playoff, which could lead to a more equitable and efficient system. This debate is crucial as it involves major conferences like the SEC and Big Ten, which are influential in shaping the future of college football. The outcome of these discussions could impact scheduling, player transfers, and coaching careers, affecting stakeholders across the sport.
What's Next?
The deadline for implementing changes to the CFP format is set between December 1 and January 23. During this period, major conferences will continue negotiations to address the concerns raised by Lanning and others. The potential changes could involve altering the playoff schedule, location, and structure to better accommodate the needs of teams and coaches. Stakeholders, including conference leaders and athletic directors, will play a critical role in these discussions. The outcome could lead to significant shifts in how the CFP is conducted, potentially setting a new precedent for college football's postseason.
