What's Happening?
During a groundbreaking ceremony for a new practice facility, Arizona Cardinals owner Michael Bidwill was questioned about the absence of a team president. Bidwill, who currently holds the title himself, was asked why the team does not have a president independent from ownership. He reiterated that he is the team president and deflected further questions on the matter. The Cardinals are one of seven NFL teams without a separate team president, joining the Cowboys, Giants, Buccaneers, Bengals, Steelers, and Colts. The team has other key executives, including a General Manager, COO, CFO, chief legal officer, and chief people officer. Bidwill's decision to serve as president himself avoids the additional expense of hiring someone for the role.
Why It's Important?
The absence of a team president in the Arizona Cardinals organization raises questions about governance and operational efficiency. Having a separate team president could provide an independent perspective and potentially enhance decision-making processes. However, Bidwill's dual role as owner and president may streamline operations and reduce costs, which could be beneficial for the team's financial health. This situation highlights a broader trend in the NFL, where some teams opt to consolidate leadership roles to maintain tighter control and reduce overhead. The decision could impact the team's strategic direction and its ability to attract top talent in executive positions.
