Feedback is a critical component of Wikipedia's draft process, playing a significant role in improving the quality of new articles. By allowing editors to receive input from experienced Wikipedians, the draft process ensures that articles are well-prepared before being published in the main article space.
Receiving Feedback on Drafts
When a draft is created in Wikipedia's Draft namespace, it becomes accessible to other editors who can provide feedback and suggestions for improvement.
This collaborative environment is one of the key benefits of the draft process, as it allows editors to refine their work with the help of the community. Feedback can be provided on the draft's associated talk page, where editors can discuss potential changes and improvements.
The Articles for Creation (AfC) process is another avenue for receiving feedback. When a draft is submitted for review, it is evaluated by experienced reviewers who assess its adherence to Wikipedia's guidelines. Reviewers provide detailed feedback on areas that need improvement, such as sourcing, neutrality, and notability. This feedback is invaluable for editors, as it helps them understand what is required for their draft to be accepted.
Implementing Feedback
Once feedback is received, editors are encouraged to make the necessary changes to their drafts. This may involve adding more reliable sources, rewriting sections to ensure neutrality, or expanding the article to provide more comprehensive coverage of the topic. Implementing feedback is a crucial step in the draft process, as it directly impacts the likelihood of the draft being accepted.
Editors can resubmit their drafts for review after making the suggested changes. The review process is iterative, meaning that drafts may go through several rounds of feedback and revision before they are ready for publication. This iterative process helps ensure that only high-quality articles are published in Wikipedia's mainspace.
The Impact of Feedback on Article Quality
The feedback provided during the draft process has a significant impact on the quality of Wikipedia articles. By addressing the feedback, editors can improve the accuracy, neutrality, and comprehensiveness of their articles. This not only benefits the individual article but also contributes to the overall quality of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia.
In conclusion, feedback is an essential part of Wikipedia's draft process. It provides editors with the guidance they need to improve their drafts and ensures that new articles meet Wikipedia's standards before being published. The collaborative nature of the feedback process also fosters a sense of community among editors, encouraging them to work together to create high-quality content.
