The Daily Show, a satirical news program on Comedy Central, underwent significant transformation during Jon Stewart's tenure as host from 1999 to 2015. Stewart's approach shifted the show's focus from character-driven comedy to a more politically charged format, earning it critical acclaim and a loyal audience. This article explores the evolution of The Daily Show under Stewart, highlighting key changes and their impact on the show's success.
A Shift in Content
When
Jon Stewart took over as host in 1999, The Daily Show began to move away from the character-driven humor that characterized Craig Kilborn's tenure. Stewart's vision for the show involved a sharper political focus, which was evident in the coverage of the 2000 election campaign. This shift allowed the show to tap into the emotional angle of news, finding its editorial voice during the 2000 election recount. Stewart's approach was instrumental in shaping the show's identity, as he encouraged correspondents to have a political viewpoint and let their passion for issues drive their comedy.
The September 11 attacks marked another turning point for The Daily Show. Stewart's somber monologue upon the show's return addressed the absurdity and importance of his role as a comedian. This period saw Stewart emerge as a trusted national figure, as he began to hammer questions about weapons of mass destruction when other news outlets were walking on eggshells. The show's coverage of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq further solidified its reputation as a source of insightful political commentary.
Broadening the Role of Correspondents
Under Stewart's leadership, the role of correspondents expanded beyond field segments to include frequent in-studio exchanges. This change allowed correspondents to work more closely with the host and writers, contributing to the show's success. Stephen Colbert, a former correspondent, noted that his work initially involved character-driven field pieces, but as the show became more news-driven, correspondents were increasingly used in studio pieces.
The show's 2000 and 2004 election coverage, combined with its new satirical edge, helped catapult Stewart and The Daily Show to new levels of popularity and critical respect. The show won numerous awards, including 23 Primetime Emmy Awards and three Peabody Awards, and its ratings steadily increased. By September 2008, The Daily Show averaged nearly two million viewers per night, with notable interviews such as Senator Barack Obama's in 2008 pulling in 3.6 million viewers.
Impact on the Political Spectrum
The Daily Show's move towards greater involvement in political issues led to examinations of its place in the political spectrum. While Stewart acknowledged the show had a more liberal point of view, he emphasized that its primary goal was to be funny. He explained that Republicans provided more comedic fodder due to their power and influence, while Democrats were often criticized for being weak or ineffective.
Stewart's tenure on The Daily Show left a lasting impact on political satire and television journalism. His approach to comedy and news influenced a generation of comedians and correspondents, shaping the landscape of late-night television. The show's success under Stewart demonstrated the power of satire in engaging audiences and sparking meaningful conversations about politics and media.
