Kepler College, an institution dedicated to astrological studies, has been at the center of various controversies since its establishment in 2000. Named after the mathematician and astronomer Johannes Kepler, the college aimed to offer higher education in astrology, a field often met with skepticism. This article delves into the debates and criticisms that have surrounded Kepler College, highlighting the challenges it faced in gaining acceptance within
the academic community.
Academic Criticism and Skepticism
From its inception, Kepler College faced significant criticism from academics who questioned the legitimacy of astrology as a field of study. The Higher Education Coordinating Board of Washington State granted provisional authorization for the college to offer degrees, but many scholars were vocal in their opposition. An administrator at the University of Washington described the board's approval as "ludicrous," equating the study of astrology to "quack medicine."
Prominent figures in academia expressed their disapproval, with John Silber, chancellor of Boston University, criticizing the college's focus on astrology. Silber argued that astrology was "bunkum" and condemned the government's endorsement of degree programs in what he considered nonsense. These criticisms highlighted the broader debate over the place of astrology in higher education and the challenges Kepler College faced in gaining acceptance.
Loss of Accreditation and Degree-Granting Authority
The skepticism surrounding astrology contributed to Kepler College's struggle to obtain full accreditation. By 2010, the college had not achieved the necessary status, leading to the revocation of its degree-granting authority by the Higher Education Coordinating Board. This decision marked a significant setback for Kepler College, as it could no longer offer bachelor's and master's degrees in astrological studies.
The loss of degree-granting authority forced Kepler College to transition to an online certificate program. While this shift allowed the institution to continue providing education in astrology, it also underscored the challenges of operating within a field often dismissed by mainstream academia. The transition to certificate programs reflected the ongoing debate over the value and legitimacy of astrological studies.
The Future of Astrological Education
Despite the controversies, Kepler College remains committed to its mission of providing education in astrology. As an unaccredited online institution, it offers certificate programs for students interested in exploring astrology within an academic framework. The college's persistence in the face of criticism highlights the enduring interest in astrology and the potential for growth in this niche field.
Looking forward, Kepler College may continue to face challenges in gaining broader acceptance within the academic community. However, its dedication to astrological education suggests that it will remain a fixture in the field, providing opportunities for those passionate about astrology. As debates over the legitimacy of astrology persist, Kepler College stands as a testament to the complexities of integrating unconventional fields into higher education.
