Financial astrology is a unique field that attempts to predict financial markets using the positions of celestial bodies. This practice, while considered fringe by many, has its proponents who believe that the movements of planets and stars can influence market trends. Notable figures in this field include Louise McWhirter and Bill Meridian, who have contributed theories and methodologies to the practice. This article delves into how celestial positions are
utilized in financial astrology to forecast market movements.
Celestial Cycles and Market Trends
One of the key concepts in financial astrology is the use of celestial cycles to predict market trends. Louise McWhirter, a prominent figure in this field, developed a theory based on the 18.6-year cycle of the North Node as it passes through the zodiac signs. According to McWhirter, this cycle can indicate major trends in business volume and finance. The cycle's crucial points are reached when the Node enters the four fixed signs, which correspond to significant market highs and lows.
In addition to the North Node cycle, McWhirter also considered the aspects and positions of major planets like Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, and Pluto. These planetary positions are believed to have secondary effects on business trends, either raising or depressing market activity. For instance, conjunctions with Jupiter are seen as favorable, while oppositions or squares with Saturn or Uranus are considered unfavorable.
The Influence of Planetary Aspects
Planetary aspects play a significant role in financial astrology. Bill Meridian, another notable financial astrologer, has applied computers to analyze these aspects, designing tools like the AstroAnalyst to aid in market predictions. Meridian's approach involves using company first trade dates and planetary positions to identify potential stock winners.
Meridian's work highlights the importance of understanding how different planetary aspects can influence market behavior. For example, favorable aspects such as trines and sextiles are believed to support positive market movements, while unfavorable aspects like squares and oppositions may indicate challenges or downturns.
The Debate Surrounding Financial Astrology
Despite its intriguing concepts, financial astrology remains a controversial practice. Critics argue that it lacks scientific basis and is more akin to pseudoscience. The alleged publication of a paper by Goldman Sachs on financial astrology in 1999 has been a point of contention, with no verifiable evidence of its existence.
Nonetheless, financial astrology continues to attract interest from those looking for alternative methods of market prediction. While mainstream finance may not embrace these ideas, the practice persists as a niche field with dedicated followers who believe in the influence of celestial bodies on financial markets.
