Defense Again Fails To Explain Errors In Karisma Kapoor's Late Ex-Husband, Sunjay Kapur’s Will, Claims of 2000 Crore Benefits Given But Not A Penny...

A second straight day of hearings in the Delhi High Court on November 21 has only sharpened the core issue. Sources exclusively informed Zoom that Priya Kapur’s side still has no explanation for the fundamental

errors in the alleged will of the late industrialist Sunjay Kapur, nor for the contradictions in their own narrative.During Friday’s proceedings, while reiterating his blatant excuse to justify misspellings, wrong genders, incorrect addresses, selective beneficiaries and no inventory of assets, Priya’s counsel failed to offer any new reasoning, factual justification, or evidence showing Sunjay had ever reviewed, approved or even seen the will.This came on the heels of Thursday’s hearing, where senior advocate Rajiv Nayar had attempted to defend the errors by invoking the now-discredited “template theory”, claiming that the will copied elements from the will of Sunjay’s mother, Rani Kapur. But the question here is why would a billionaire depend on his elderly mother’s will to draft his own, and still fail to correct basic facts about his own children, assets and his gender?Today’s hearing only reinforced the implausibility. The defence still could not explain why Rani’s will was notarised and procedurally correct, while Sunjay’s — covering far larger assets — is neither notarised nor registered. Nor could they explain the absence of a single email, message, note or instruction from Sunjay regarding the document. The digital trail continues to show the file originated from a device with no connection to the late industrialist.What added to the inconsistencies was the defence’s attempt to conflate two entirely separate issues, i.e., payments made under the divorce decree and the value of the RK Family Trust. Firstly, payments made by Priya towards the children’s expenses were obligations under the consent terms and are now the obligation of the estate. Secondly, despite loud claims of a Rs. 2,000 crore benefit being given, not a single rupee has been received by the kids from the trust. Yet Priya’s side continued presenting the two as interchangeable, a misleading and factually incorrect argument.Friday’s submissions further revived yesterday’s unanswered concerns about the delayed disclosure of the will, the attempt to secure signatures before sharing it and factual mistakes, issues Priya’s counsel again failed to counter.Across both days, the pattern has only become starker: The defence cannot explain the errors, cannot justify the omissions, cannot produce evidence of Sunjay’s involvement and cannot stop confusing routine payments with the trust assets.