Perfect Crown has landed in a controversy ahead of its finale. The IU and Byeon Woo-Seok starrer K-drama aired its Episode 11 on May 15, and soon started receiving backlash after viewers accused the show of depicting a fictional version of Korea as historically subordinate to China. The backlash intensified following the second-last episode, which showed Prince Ian ascending the throne with the support of his wife Seong Huiju. For the unversed, Perfect Crown included traces of historical drama that re-imagines an alternate timeline where Korea remained a constitutional monarchy after the 20th century, with Ian's royal family continuing to rule because the country was never colonised by Japan.The series, which has emerged as the biggest success
on Disney+ to date, has drawn attention for its unique political setting since its premiere, royal intrigue, intense chemistry between the leads, and notable performances. However, the latest episode sparked heated debate over its use of royal symbolism and historical references.
What is the controversy about?
Criticism mainly focused on the ceremonial attire worn by Prince Ian during his coronation. In the scene, the character appeared wearing a traditional crown known as the "Guryumyeongwan," distinguished by nine strings of beads hanging from the front and back. Historically, this headpiece was associated with kings of the Joseon dynasty during periods when Korea acknowledged China through a tributary relationship.
Historical symbolism
As per history, rulers of independent empires traditionally wore the "Sipyiryumyeongwan," a more sovereign symbol featuring twelve bead strings. This left netizens arguing that because the drama portrays Korea as an independent monarchy in modern times, the use of the nine-string crown implied that the fictional nation still existed under Chinese influence.The controversy grew further when during Prince Ian's ascension ceremony, the parliament members in the drama shouted "Cheon-se" which means "may the kingdom prosper for a thousand years." In Korean history, this phrase was commonly reserved for Joseon kings, while "Man-se," meaning "ten thousand years," was used for emperors, particularly the Chinese ones. Many viewers interpreted the dialogue choice as another indication that the series was presenting Korea as a lesser kingdom rather than a fully sovereign empire.
Social media reactions
Social media users argued that the drama’s fictional worldbuilding unintentionally echoed disputed narratives. A user wrote on X (formerly Twitter), "At a time when attempts to appropriate other nations’ cultures are intensifying, Korean dramas using expressions that seem to portray themselves as vassal states are acts that tarnish the nation’s honour."Another post read, "This is a dangerous portrayal that goes beyond creative freedom and could instill incorrect historical perceptions, greatly risking the misinterpretation of Korean history as that of a vassal state."Despite the growing controversy, Perfect Crown remains one of the most talked-about Korean dramas of the year. The series is scheduled to air its final episode on May 16.